Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Central venous lines for chronic hemodialysis: survey of the Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Central venous lines (CVL) continue to be the most commonly used vascular access device for children on hemodialysis (HD). Despite their frequent use, little is known regarding the frequency of CVL-related intradialytic complications that could interfere with delivery of effective dialysis. To better assess this, we conducted a cross-sectional study of ten HD centers within the Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium. Vascular access was provided by CVL in 61 of the 83 patients (73%) included. CVL dysfunction (defined as reduced blood flows, need for reversed lines, or frequent intradialytic alarms) occurred in 46% in the prior month. Treatment for suspected clots occurred in 16 patients. Intraluminal tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) was the preferred treatment for a suspected clot. The survey also inquired about the preferred treatment for documented clots, and intraluminal tPA was most preferred, followed by CVL stripping, CVL removal, CVL brushing, and systemic tPA. As for preventative strategies, most HD centers locked the CVL with intraluminal heparin in concentrations ranging from 1,000 to 5,000 U/ml. In conclusion, catheter usage rates and complications were highly prevalent in pediatric HD units in this study. As treatment strategies varied greatly, future prospective studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of each individual therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chand DH, Brier M, Strife CF (2005) Comparison of vascular access type in pediatric hemodialysis patients with respect to urea clearance, anemia management, and serum albumin concentration. Am J Kidney Dis 45:303–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramage IJ, Bailie A, Tyerman KS, McColl JH, Pollard SG, Fitzpatrick MM (2005) Vascular access survival in children and young adults receiving long-term hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 45:708–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leonard MB, Donaldson LA, Ho M, Geary DF (2003) A prospective cohort study of incident maintenance dialysis in children: an NAPRTC study. Kidney Int 63:744–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma A, Zilleruelo G, Abitbol C, Montane B, Strauss J (1999) Survival and complications of cuffed catheters in children on chronic hemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 13:245–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein SL, Macierowski CT, Jabs K (1997) Hemodialysis catheter survival and complications in children and adolescents. Pediatr Nephrol 11:74–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schillinger F, Schillinger D, Montagnac R, Milcent T (1991) Post catheterisation vein stenosis in haemodialysis: comparative angiographic study of 50 subclavian and 50 internal jugular accesses. Nephrol Dial Transplant 6:722–724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Trerotola SO, Kuhn-Fulton J, Johnson MS, Shah H, Ambrosius WT, Kneebone PH (2000) Tunneled infusion catheters: increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular venous access. Radiology 217:89–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilkin TD, Kraus MA, Lane KA, Trerotola SO (2003) Internal jugular vein thrombosis associated with hemodialysis catheters. Radiology 228:697–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakiewicz PG, Paganini EP, Wright E (2000) Introduction of a switch that can reverse blood flow direction on-line during hemodialysis. ASAIO J 46:464–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Daeihagh P, Jordan J, Chen J, Rocco M (2000) Efficacy of tissue plasminogen activator administration on patency of hemodialysis access catheters. Am J Kidney Dis 36:75–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Twardowski ZJ (1998) High-dose intradialytic urokinase to restore the patency of permanent central vein hemodialysis catheters. Am J Kidney Dis 31:841–847

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clase CM, Crowther MA, Ingram AJ, Cina CS (2001) Thrombolysis for restoration of patency to haemodialysis central venous catheters: a systematic review. J Thromb Thrombolysis 11:127–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gray RJ, Levitin A, Buck D, Brown LC, Sparling YH, Jablonski KA, Fessahaye A, Gupta AK (2000) Percutaneous fibrin sheath stripping versus transcatheter urokinase infusion for malfunctioning well-positioned tunneled central venous dialysis catheters: a prospective, randomized trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:1121–1129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trerotola SO, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, Shah H, Ambrosius WT, McKusky MA, Kraus MA (1997) Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed via the right internal jugular vein by interventional radiologists. Radiology 203:489–495

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoshal VL Jr, Ause RG, Hoskins PA (1971) Fibrin sleeve formation on indwelling subclavian central venous catheters. Arch Surg 102:253–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmed N (1976) Thrombosis after central venous cannulation. Med J Aust 1:217–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brismar B, Hardstedt C, Jacobson S (1981) Diagnosis of thrombosis by catheter phlebography after prolonged central venous catheterization. Ann Surg 194:779–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Crain MR, Mewissen MW, Ostrowski GJ, Paz-Fumagalli R, Beres RA, Wertz RA (1996) Fibrin sleeve stripping for salvage of failing hemodialysis catheters: technique and initial results. Radiology 198:41–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rockall AG, Harris A, Wetton CW, Taube D, Gedroyc W, Al-Kutoubi MA (1997) Stripping of failing haemodialysis catheters using the Ampltaz gooseneck snare. Clin Radiol 52:616–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cox K, Vesely TM, Windus DW, Pilgram TK (2000) The utility of brushing dysfunctional hemodialysis catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:979–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yevzlin AS, Conley EL, Sanchez RJ, Young HN, Becker BN (2006) Vascular access outcomes and medication use: a USRDS study. Semin Dial 19:535–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mokrzycki MH, Jean-Jerome K, Rush H, Zdunek MP, Rosenberg SO (2001) A randomized trial of minidose warfarin for the prevention of late malfunction in tunneled, cuffed hemodialysis catheters. Kidney Int 59:1935–1942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudolph P. Valentini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valentini, R.P., Geary, D.F. & Chand, D.H. Central venous lines for chronic hemodialysis: survey of the Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium. Pediatr Nephrol 23, 291–295 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-007-0658-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-007-0658-0

Keywords

Navigation