Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclophosphamide in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: outcome and outlook

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome often follows a relapsing course with a substantial number of patients requiring cytotoxic therapy with cyclophosphamide (CP). However, the long-term success of CP treatment is difficult to predict. We retrospectively evaluated 106 patients after CP to identify parameters associated with sustained remission. The overall rate of cumulative sustained remission was 24% after 10 years. No gender difference was found. Several factors were significantly correlated with the rate of sustained remission: age at CP therapy (remission 34% versus 9% in children older or younger than 5.5 years, P<0.01), frequently relapsing versus steroid-dependent status (54% versus 17%, P<0.05), leukopenia under CP treatment (44% in children with leukopenia versus 19% in children without leukopenia, P<0.05), and a cumulative dosage per body surface area (BSA) of more or less than 5,040 mg/m2 (45% versus 11%, P<0.01). In contrast, the cumulative dosage per kilogram body weight had no significant influence on long-term remission (23% in children with >168 mg/kg versus 26% in children with <168 mg/kg, P>0.05). The current concept of CP treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome is less effective in preschool children. CP therapy should be re-evaluated on a BSA-adjusted regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brodehl J (1996) Management of nephrotic syndrome in children. Clin Immunother 5:175–192

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barratt TM, Soothill JF (1970) Controlled trial of cyclophosphamide in steroid-sensitive relapsing nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Lancet II: 479–482

    Google Scholar 

  3. Latta K, Schnakenburg C von, Ehrich JHH (2001) A meta-analysis of cytotoxic treatment in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome in children. Pediatr Nephrol 16:271–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. International Study of Kidney Disease in Children (1978) Nephrotic syndrome in children: prediction of histopathology from clinical and laboratory characteristics at time of diagnosis. Kidney Int 13:159–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie (1979) Alternate-day versus intermittent prednisone in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Lancet I: 401–403

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barratt TM, Osofsky SG, Bercowsky A, Soothill JF (1975) Cyclophosphamide treatment in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Lancet I:55–58

    Google Scholar 

  7. McDonald J, Murphy AV, Arneil GC (1974) Long-term assessment of cyclophosphamide therapy for nephrosis in children. Lancet II:980–982

    Google Scholar 

  8. Konrad M, Mytilineos J, Ruder H, Opelz G, Schärer K (1997) HLA-DR 7 predicts the response to alkylating agents in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 11:16–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pädiatrische Nephrologie (1982) Effect of cytotoxic drugs in frequent relapsing nephrotic syndrome with and without steroid dependency. N Engl J Med 306:451–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sladek NE, Priest J, Doeden D, Mirocha CJ, Pathre S, Krivit W (1980) Plasma half-life and urinary excretion of cyclophosphamide in children. Cancer Treat Rep 64:1061–1066

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yule SM, Boddy AV, Cole M, Price L, Wyllie R, Tasso MJ, Pearson ADJ, Idle JR (1996) Cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol 41:13–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoyer PF, Brodehl J, Ehrich JHH, Offner G (1991) Practical aspects in the use of cyclosporin in paediatric nephrology. Pediatr Nephrol 5:630–638

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber LT, Shipkova M, Lamersdorf T, Niedmann PD, Wiesel M, Mandelbaum A, Zimmerhackl LB, Schutz E, Mehls O, Oellerich M, Armstrong VW, Tönshoff B (1998) Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and determinants of MPA free fraction in pediatric and adult renal transplant recipients. German Study group on Mycophenolate Mofetil Therapy in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 9:1511–1520

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Watson AR, Rance CP, Bain J (1985) Long term effects of cyclophosphamide on testicular function. BMJ 291:1457–1460

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant from "Forschungsunterstützungskreis Kindernephrologie e.V." A part of this work was presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the European Society of Paediatric Nephrology, Prague, Czech Republic, 2–5 September 1999 and at the 12th congress of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA), Seattle, USA, 1–5 September 2001 and published in abstract form (Pediatr Nephrol 1999 and 2001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Udo Vester.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vester, U., Kranz, B., Zimmermann, S. et al. Cyclophosphamide in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: outcome and outlook. Pediatr Nephrol 18, 661–664 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-003-1170-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-003-1170-9

Keywords

Navigation