Skip to main content
Log in

Reasons for conversions in thoracoscopic repairs of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernias: a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This systematic review focused on reasons for conversions in neonates undergoing thoracoscopic congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair.

Methods

Systematic search of Medline/Pubmed and Embase was performed for English, Spanish and Portuguese reports, according to PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Of the 153 articles identified (2003–2023), 28 met the inclusion criteria and offered 698 neonates for analysis. Mean birth weight and gestational age were 3109 g and 38.3 weeks, respectively, and neonates were operated at a mean age of 6.12 days. There were 278 males (61.50%; 278/452) and 174 females (38.50%; 174/452). The reasons for the 137 conversions (19.63%) were: (a) defect size (n = 22), (b) need for patch (n = 21); (c) difficulty in reducing organs (n = 14), (d) ventilation issues (n = 10), (e) bleeding, organ injury, cardiovascular instability (n = 3 each), (f) bowel ischemia and defect position (n = 2 each), hepatopulmonary fusion (n = 1), and (g) reason was not specified for n = 56 neonates (40.8%). The repair was primary in 322 neonates (63.1%; 322/510) and patch was used in 188 neonates (36.86%; 188/510). There were 80 recurrences (12.16%; 80/658) and 14 deaths (2.48%; 14/565). Mean LOS and follow-up were 20.17 days and 19.28 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Neonatal thoracoscopic repair for CDH is associated with conversion in 20% of cases. Based on available data, defect size and patch repairs have been identified as the predominant reasons, followed by technical difficulties to reduce the herniated organs and ventilation related issues. However, data specifically relating to conversion is poorly documented in a high number of reports (40%). Accurate data reporting in future will be important to better estimate and quantify reasons for conversions in neonatal thoracoscopy for CDH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berno Oliveira J, Russi K, Kosinski S et al (2023) Epidemiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, esophageal atresia, and gastroschisis in South Brazil. J Neonatal Surg 12:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Laje P, Hedrick HL, Flake AW et al (2016) Delayed abdominal closure after congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg 51:240–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. da Costa KM, Saxena AK (2021) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair analysis in relation to postoperative abdominal compartment syndrome and delayed abdominal closure. Updates Surg 73:2059–2064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu R, Zheng Z, Tang C et al (2022) Thoracoscopic surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: Should it be the first choice? Front Pediatr 10:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sundaram J, Ramasundaram M, Agarwal P et al (2022) Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: tips and tricks learned from an institutional experience. Niger J Clin Pract 25:1635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liem NT (2003) Thoracoscopic surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a report of nine cases. Asian J Surg 26:210–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. He Q, Zhong W, Zhang H et al (2016) Standardized indications to assist in the safe thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 26:399–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lacher M, St Peter SD, Laje P et al (2015) Thoracoscopic CDH repair—a survey on opinion and experience among IPEG members. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 25:954–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Budzanowski A, Loukogeorgakis S, Mullassery D et al (2023) Thoracoscopic vs open repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a comparison of intra-operative data. Pediatr Surg Int 39:82

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kotb M, Shehata S, Khairi A et al (2021) Thoracoscopic repair of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia: minimizing open repair in a low-income country. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 31:1341–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bawazir O, Bawazir A (2021) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: open versus thoracoscopic repair. African J Paediatr Surg 18:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Costerus S, Zahn K, van de Ven K et al (2016) Thoracoscopic versus open repair of CDH in cardiovascular stable neonates. Surg Endosc 30:2818–2824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gander JW, Fisher JC, Gross ER et al (2011) Early recurrence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia is higher after thoracoscopic than open repair: a single institutional study. J Pediatr Surg 46:1303–1308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. He Q, Zhong W, Wang Z et al (2019) Simple and safe thoracoscopic repair of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia by a new modified knot-tying technique. Hernia 23:1275–1278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li B, Li ST, Chen WB et al (2019) Thoracoscopic repair by simplified mattress sutures for diaphragmatic hernia in the neonate when no posterolateral diaphragmatic rim exists. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 29:710–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schlager A, Arps K, Siddharthan R et al (2018) Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: feasibility and outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 28:774–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Criss CN, Coughlin MA, Matusko N et al (2018) Outcomes for thoracoscopic versus open repair of small to moderate congenital diaphragmatic hernias. J Pediatr Surg 53:635–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tyson AF, Sola R, Arnold MR et al (2017) Thoracoscopic versus open congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: single tertiary center review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 27:1209–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zani A, Lamas-Pinheiro R, Paraboschi I et al (2017) Intraoperative acidosis and hypercapnia during thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula. Pediatr Anesth 27:841–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weaver KL, Baerg JE, Okawada M et al (2016) A multi-institutional review of thoracoscopic congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 26:825–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Okazaki T, Okawada M, Koga H et al (2016) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: factors related to failure of thoracoscopic repair. Pediatr Surg Int 32:933–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Iede MM, Karpelowsky J, Fitzgerald DA (2016) Recurrent diaphragmatic hernia: modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. Pediatr Pulmonol 51:394–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Inoue M, Uchida K, Otake K et al (2016) Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia with countermeasures against reported complications for safe outcomes comparable to laparotomy. Surg Endosc 30:1014–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nam SH, Cho MJ, Kim DY et al (2013) Shifting from laparotomy to thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: early experience. World J Surg 37:2711–2716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gomes Ferreira C, Kuhn P, Lacreuse I et al (2013) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an evaluation of risk factors for failure of thoracoscopic primary repair in neonates. J Pediatr Surg 48:488–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Jazaeri A (2012) Simplified technique for minimally invasive repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia using hollow-needle snare and transthoracic traction stitches. J Pediatr Surg 47:258–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta RK, Parelkar SV, Oak SN et al (2011) Early experience with thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias in pediatric age group: results and lessons learned. Pediatr Surg Int 27:563–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Keijzer R, van de Ven C, Vlot J et al (2010) Thoracoscopic repair in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: patching is safe and reduces the recurrence rate. J Pediatr Surg 45:953–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gourlay DM, Cassidy LD, Sato TT et al (2009) Beyond feasibility: a comparison of newborns undergoing thoracoscopic and open repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernias. J Pediatr Surg 44:1702–1707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim AC, Bryner BS, Akay B et al (2009) Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: lessons learned. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19:575–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cho SD, Krishnaswami S, Mckee JC et al (2009) Analysis of 29 consecutive thoracoscopic repairs of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates compared to historical controls. J Pediatr Surg 44:80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guner YS, Chokshi N, Aranda A et al (2008) Thoracoscopic repair of neonatal diaphragmatic hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 18:875–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shah SR, Wishnew J, Barsness K et al (2009) Minimally invasive congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: a 7-year review of one institution’s experience. Surg Endosc 23:1265–1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hosokawa T, Yamada Y, Takahashi H et al (2019) Postnatal ultrasound to determine the surgical strategy for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Ultrasound Med 38:2347–2358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Becmeur F, Reinberg O, Dimitriu C et al (2007) Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 16:238–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gomes Ferreira C, Reinberg O, Becmeur F et al (2009) Neonatal minimally invasive surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernias: a multicenter study using thoracoscopy or laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 23:1650–1659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Choudhry M, Rusu S, Brooks P et al (2021) Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in preterm neonate at 1 Kilogram. Eur J Pediatr Surg Reports 09:e13–e16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wall JK, Sinclair TJ, Kethman W et al (2018) Advanced minimal access surgery in infants weighing less than 3 kg: a single center experience. J Pediatr Surg 53:503–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Liem NT (2013) Thoracoscopic approach in management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Surg Int 29:1061–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsao K, Lally KP (2008) The congenital diaphragmatic hernia study group: a voluntary international registry. Semin Pediatr Surg 17:90–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bliss D, Matar M, Krishnaswami S (2009) Should intraoperative hypercapnea or hypercarbia raise concern in neonates undergoing thoracoscopic repair of diaphragmatic hernia of bochdalek? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19:s55–s58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Aggarwal A, Lohani R, Suresh V (2016) Case series on anesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in children. Anesth Essays Res 10:128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Reino-Pires P, Lopez M (2018) Validation of a low-cost do-it-yourself model for neonatal thoracoscopic congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Surg Educ 75:1658–1663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bökkerink GM, Joosten M, Leijte E et al (2021) Validation of low-cost models for minimal invasive surgery training of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 56:465–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Obata S, Ieiri S, Uemura M et al (2015) An endoscopic surgical skill validation system for pediatric surgeons using a model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 25:775–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Barsness KA, Rooney DM, Davis LM (2013) The development and evaluation of a novel thoracoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 23:714–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bethell GS, Eastwood MP, Neville JJ et al (2023) Development of a 3D-printed neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia model and standardisation of intra-operative measurement. Pediatr Surg Int 40:28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amulya Kumar Saxena.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Karina Miura da Costa, Dr. Iulia Stratulat and Prof. Amulya Kumar Saxena have no conflict of interest or financial ties do disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Costa, K.M., Stratulat, I. & Saxena, A.K. Reasons for conversions in thoracoscopic repairs of neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernias: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 38, 2405–2410 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10831-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10831-w

Keywords

Navigation