Skip to main content
Log in

Esophageal dilation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a more systematic approach is needed

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The occurrence of esophageal dilation after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB) had not been yet investigated systematically.

Methods

In this study, standardized barium swallow studies were used to assess 45 LASGB patients for the development of esophageal dilation after the operation and after a mean follow-up period of 39.3 months. The diameter of the esophagus postoperatively and during the follow-up period was calculated in millimeters using the known diameter of the gastric band. An increase in diameter exceeding 130% compared with the postoperative diameter was considered as dilation. Symptoms were assessed by a questionnaire. For 11 patients with dilation, the band was emptied and a barium swallow performed to assess whether the dilation was reversible.

Results

A significant increase in the esophageal diameter (median and interquartile range [IQR]) was found by comparing the early postoperative and follow-up data: median, 16.3 mm (IQR, 14–18.7 mm) versus median, 20.7 mm (IQR, 18.1–26.8 mm; p < 0.01). For 25 (55.6%) of the 45 patients, the dilation percentage exceeded 130%. For 7 of the 11 patients, the dilation after emptying of the band still exceeded 130%. The increase in esophageal diameter was significantly correlated with the duration of follow-up evaluation, regurgitation, heartburn at night, and slow esophageal clearance.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding causes esophageal dilation in about half of patients. This dilation is correlated with symptoms and is partly reversible after emptying of the band. The clinical relevance of the dilation is unclear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Maria EJ, Sugarman HJ, Meador JG, Doty JM, Kellum LM, Wolfe L, Szucs RA, Turner MA (2001) High failure rate after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg 233:809–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peternac D, Hauser R, Weber M, Schob O (2001) The effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on the proximal pouch and the esophagus. Obes Surg 11:76–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Niville E, Dams A (1999) Late pouch dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric and esophagogastric banding: incidence, treatment, and outcome. Obes Surg 9:381–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss HG, Nehoda H, Labeck B, Peer-Kuehberger MD, Oberwalder M, Aigner F, Wetscher GJ (2002) Adjustable gastric and esophagogastric banding: a randomized trial. Obes Surg 12:573–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiesner W, Hauser M, Schob O, Weber M, Hauser RS (2001) Pseudo-achalasia following laparoscopically placed adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 11:513–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiner R, Blanco-Engert R, Weiner S, Matkowitz R, Schaefer L, Pomhoff I (2003) Outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: 8 years experience. Obes Surg 13:427–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chevallier JM, Zinzindohoue F, Douard R, Blanche JP, Berta JL, Altman JJ, Cugnenc PH (2004) Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years. Obes Surg 14:407–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fielding GA, Duncombe JE (2005) Clinical and radiological follow-up of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands, 1998 and 2000: a comparison of two techniques. Obes Surg 15:634–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Belachew M, Belva PH, Desaive C (2002) Long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg 12:564–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dargent J (2005) Esophageal dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: definition and strategy. Obes Surg 15:843–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Maria E (2003) Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding: complications. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 13:271–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiss HG, Nehoda H, Labeck B, Peer-Kühberger MD, Klingler P, Gadenstätter M, Aigner F, Wetscher GJ (2000) Treatment of morbid obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding affects esophageal motility. Am J Surg 180:479–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gustavsson S, Westling A (2002) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: complications and side effects responsible for the poor long-term outcome. Semin Laparoscopic Surg 9:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss HG, Kirchmayr W, Klaus A, Bonatti H, Mühlmann G, Nehoda H, Himpens J, Aigner F (2004) Surgical revision after failure of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Br J Surg 91:235–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Forsell P, Hallerback B, Gilse H, Hellers G (1999) Complications following Swedish adjustable gastric banding: a long term follow-up. Obes Surg 9:11–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutschow CA, Collet P, Prenzel K, Holscher AH, Schneider PM (2005) Long-term results and gastroesophageal reflux in a series of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. J Gastrointest Surg 9:941–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klaus A, Gruber I, Wetscher G, Nehoda H, Aigner F, Peer R, Margreiter R, Weiss H (2006) Prevalent esophageal body motility disorders underlie aggravation of GERD symptoms in morbidly obese patients following adjustable gastric banding. Arch Surg 141:247–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ceelen W, Walder J, Cardon A, Van Renterghem K, Hesse U, El Malt M, Pattyn P (2003) Surgical treatment of severe obesity with a low-pressure adjustable gastric band: experimental data and clinical results in 625 patients. Ann Surg 237:10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lew JI, Daud A, DiGorgi MF, Olivero-Rivera L, Davis DG, Bessler M (2006) Preoperative esophageal manometry and outcome of laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. Surg Endosc 20:1242–1247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Milone L, Daud A, Durak E, Olovero-Rivero L, Schrope B, Inabnet WB, Davis D, Bessler M (2008) Esophageal dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Endosc 22:1482–1486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spivak H, Hewitt MF, Onn A, Halff EE (2005) Weight loss and improvement of obesity-related illness in 500 U.S. patients following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedure. Am J Surg 189:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin R. de Jong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Jong, J.R., Tiethof, C., van Ramshorst, B. et al. Esophageal dilation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a more systematic approach is needed. Surg Endosc 23, 2802–2808 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0516-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0516-1

Keywords

Navigation