Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Best Practice Recommendations for Dysphagia Management in Intensive Care Unit (ICU): A Delphi Study from Multidisciplinary Experts in Turkey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is no study about all aspects of oropharyngoesophageal (OPE) dysphagia from diagnosis to follow-up in a multidisciplinary manner in the world. In order to close this gap, we aimed to create a recommendation study that can be used in clinical practice, addressing all aspects of dysphagia in the ICU in detail with the opinion of experienced multidisciplinary experts. This recommendation paper was generated by a multidisciplinary team, using the seven-step process and a three-modified Delphi round via e-mail. Firstly, 15 open-ended questions were created, and then detailed recommendations including general principles, management, diagnosis, rehabilitation, and follow-up were created with the answers from these questions, Each recommendation item was voted on by the experts as overall consensus (strong recommendation), approaching consensus (weak recommendation), and divergent consensus (not recommended).In the first Delphi round, a questionnaire consisting of 413 items evaluated with a scale of 0–10 was prepared from the opinions and suggestions given to 15 open-ended questions. In the second Delphi round, 55.4% were accepted and revised suggestions were created. At the end of the third Delphi round, the revised suggestion form was approved again and the final proposals containing 133 items were created. This study includes comprehensive and detailed recommendations, including a broad perspective from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up, as detailed as possible, for management of dysphagia in patients with both oropharyngeal- and esophageal-dysphagia in ICU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Lai CC, Ho CH, Chang CL, Chen CM, Chiang SR, Chao CM, et al. Critical care medicine in Taiwan from 1997 to 2013 under National Health Insurance. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(8):4957–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. van Snippenburg W, Kröner A, Flim M, Hofhuis J, Buise M, Hemler R, Spronk P. Awareness and Management of Dysphagia in Dutch intensive care units: a nationwide survey. Dysphagia. 2019;34(2):220–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh S, Hamdy S. Dysphagia in stroke patients. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:383–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schröder J, Glahn J, Dziewas R. ICU-related dysphagia epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment. ICU Management. 2015;15(3):108–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Macht M, Wimbish T, Bodine C, Moss M. ICU-acquired swallowing disorders. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(10):2396–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brodsky MB, Pandian V, Needham DM. Post-extubation dysphagia: a problem needing multidisciplinary efforts. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(1):93–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leder S, Suiter D, Lisitiano W. Answering orientation questions and following single-step verbal commands: effect on aspiration status. Dysphagia. 2019;24(3):290–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Logemann JA, Gensler G, Robbins J, Lindblad AS, Brandt D, Hind JA, et al. A randomized study of three interventions for aspiration of thin liquids in patients with dementia or Parkinson’s disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:173–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brodsky MB, Nollet JL, Spronk PE, González-Fernández M. Prevalence, pathophysiology, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options for dysphagia in critically Ill patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(12):1164–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zuercher P, Dziewas R, Schefold JC. Dysphagia in the intensive care unit: a (multidisciplinary) call to action. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(3):554–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schefold JC, Berger D, Zürcher P, Lensch M, Perren A, Jakob SM, et al. Dysphagia in mechanically ventilated ICU patients (dynamics): a prospective observational trial. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(12):2061–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Macht M, King CJ, Wimbish T, Clark BJ, Benson AB, Burnham EL, et al. Post-extubation dysphagia is associated with longer hospitalization in survivors of critical illness with neurologic impairment. Crit Care. 2013;17(3):R119. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12791.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Altman KW, Yu GP, Schaefer SD. Consequence of dysphagia in the hospitalized patient: Impact on prognosis and hospital resources. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136:784–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Medeiros GC, Sassi FC, Lirani-Silva C, Andrade CRF. Criteria for tracheostomy decannulation: literature review. Codas. 2019;31(6):e20180228. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192018228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grosse-Sundrup M, Henneman JP, Sandberg WS, Bateman BT, Uribe JV, Nguyen NT, et al. Intermediate acting non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: prospective propensity score matched cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e6329. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Malandraki GA, Markaki V, Georgopoulos VC, Psychogios L, Nanas S. Postextubation dysphagia in critical patients: a first report from the largest step-down intensive care unit in Greece. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016;25(2):150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Royal Collage of Speech Language Therapists. Position statement: speech and language therapists working in adult and paediatric critical care units. 2019. https://www.rcslt.org/wp-content/uploads/media/docs/clinical-guidance/rcslt-position-statement-critical-care.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2023.

  18. Sforza E. Patients at risk of dysphagia in intensive care units. J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;2(2):12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J. The Delphi method for graduate research. J Inf Technol Educ. 2007;6:257–81.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ziglio E. The Delphi Method and its contribution to decision making. In: Adler M, Ziglio E, editors. Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Kingsley; 1996. p. 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):96–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for chronic pain management. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nair R, Aggarwal R, Khanna D. Methods of formal consensus in classification/diagnostic criteria and guideline development. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011;41(2):95–105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Vach W. The dependence of Cohen’s kappa on the prevalence does not matter. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:655–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kraemer HC, Periyakoil VS, Noda A. Kappa coefficients in medical research. Stat Med. 2002;21:2109–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EU, SE: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. KD, GKK, IG, EG, MPA, BGK, EG, ZU, SB, FK, FB, MV, BA, HK, FO, SA, CU, EB, AU, EA: Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebru Umay.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

There is no competing interests among the authors.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (IRC:2021–120/12) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 35 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Umay, E., Eyigor, S., Demirag, K. et al. Best Practice Recommendations for Dysphagia Management in Intensive Care Unit (ICU): A Delphi Study from Multidisciplinary Experts in Turkey. Dysphagia 39, 241–254 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-023-10606-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-023-10606-w

Keywords

Navigation