Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the SWAL-QoL Questionnaire in Greek

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to translate and adapt the 44-item SWAL-QoL into Greek and examine its internal consistency, test–retest reliability, external construct validity, and discriminant validity in order to provide a validated dysphagia-specific QoL instrument in the Greek language. The instrument was translated into Greek using the back translation to ensure linguistic validity and was culturally adapted resulting in the SWAL-QoL-GR. Two groups of participants were included: a patient group of 86 adults (48 males; age range: 18–87 years) diagnosed with oropharyngeal dysphagia, and an age-matched healthy control group (39 adults; 19 males; age range: 18–84 years). The Greek 30-item version of the WHOQOL-BREF was used for assessment of construct validity. Overall, the questionnaire achieved good to excellent psychometric values. Internal consistency of all 10 subscales and the physical symptoms scale of the SWAL-QoL-GR assessed by Cronbach’s α was good to excellent (0.811 < α < 0.940). Test–retest validity was found to be good to excellent as well. In addition, moderate to strong correlations were found between seven of the ten subscales of the SWAL-QoL-GR with limited items of the WHOQΟL-BREF (0.401 < ρ < 0.65), supporting good construct validity of the SWAL-QoL-GR. The SWAL-QoL-GR also correctly differentiated between patients with dysphagia and age-matched healthy controls (p < 0.001) on all 11 scales, further indicating excellent discriminant validity. Finally, no significant differences were found between the two sexes. This cultural adaptation and validation allows the use of this tool in Greece, further enhancing our clinical and scientific efforts to increase the evidence-based practice resources for dysphagia rehabilitation in Greece.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chow L, Siu E, Kong H, et al. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among elderly Chinese private nursing home residents in Hong Kong. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr. 2004;19:734–40. doi:10.1002/gps.1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ekberg O, Hamdy S, Woisard V, et al. Social and psychological burden of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and treatment. Dysphagia. 2002;17:139–46. doi:10.1007/s00455-001-0113-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eslick GD, Talley NJ. Dysphagia: epidemiology, risk factors and impact on quality of life—a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:971–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03664.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Farri A, Accornero A, Burdese C. Social importance of dysphagia: its impact on diagnosis and therapy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007;27:83–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillespie MB, Brodsky MB, Day TA, et al. Swallowing-related quality of life after head and neck cancer treatment. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:1362–7. doi:10.1097/00005537-200408000-00008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen NP, Frank C, Moltz CC, et al. Impact of dysphagia on quality of life after treatment of head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:772–8. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Plowman-Prine EK, Sapienza CM, Okun MS, et al. The relationship between quality of life and swallowing in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2009;24:1352–8. doi:10.1002/mds.22617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Deshpande PR, Rajan S, Sudeepthi BL, Abdul Nazir CP. Patient-reported outcomes: a new era in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2:137–44. doi:10.4103/2229-3485.86879.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chin R, Lee BY. Economics and patient reported outcomes. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2008. p. 145–66.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McHorney CA, Bricker DE, Kramer AE, et al. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: I. Conceptual foundation and item development. Dysphagia. 2000;15:115–21. doi:10.1007/s004550010012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McHorney CCA, Bricker DE, Robbins JJ, et al. The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagiain adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling. Dysphagia. 2000;15:122–33. doi:10.1007/s004550010013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McHorney CA, Robbins J, Lomax K, et al. The SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17:97–114. doi:10.1007/s00455-001-0109-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Costa Bandeira AK, Azevedo EHM, Vartanian JG, et al. Quality of life related to swallowing after tongue cancer treatment. Dysphagia. 2008;23:183–92. doi:10.1007/s00455-007-9124-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenblatt DY, Sippel R, Leverson G, et al. Thyroid resection improves perception of swallowing function in patients with thyroid disease. World J Surg. 2009;33:255–60. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9837-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pyn Leow L, Huckabee ML, Anderson T, Beckert L. The impact of dysphagia on quality of life in ageing and Parkinson’s disease as measured by the swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QoL) questionnaire. Dysphagia. 2010;25:216–20. doi:10.1007/s00455-009-9245-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paris G, Martinaud O, Petit A, et al. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis alters quality of life. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:199–204. doi:10.1111/joor.12019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rinkel RN, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Langendijk JA, et al. The psychometric and clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL questionnaire in evaluating swallowing problems experienced by patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol; 2009. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Robbins J, Kays SA, Gangnon RE, et al. The effects of lingual exercise in stroke patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:150–8. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.11.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Troche MS, Okun MS, Rosenbek JC, et al. Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2010;75:1912–9. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fef115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Webster KT, Samlan RA, Jones B, et al. Supracricoid partial laryngectomy: swallowing, voice, and speech outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010;119:10–6. doi:10.1177/000348941011900102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Finizia C, Rudberg I, Bergqvist H, Rydén A. A cross-sectional validation study of the swedish version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2012;27:325–35. doi:10.1007/s00455-011-9369-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khaldoun E, Woisard V, Verin É. Validation in French of the SWAL-QOL scale in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009;33:167–71. doi:10.1016/j.gcb.2008.12.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bogaardt H, Speyer R, Baijens L, Fokkens W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the dutch version of SWAL-QoL. Dysphagia. 2009;24:66–70. doi:10.1007/s00455-008-9174-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lam PM, Lai CKY. The validation of the Chinese version of the swallow quality-of-life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Dysphagia. 2011;26:117–24. doi:10.1007/s00455-010-9272-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Montoni NP, Horta IA, Bandeira AKC, Angelis EC. Cross-cultural adaptation of the SWAL-QOL and Swal-Care Questionnaires into Brazilian Portuguese. Appl Cancer Res. 2009;29:129–34.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim S, Cha Y. Reliability and validity of Korean version of the SWAL-QOL. J Korea Acad. 2014;15:2981–8. doi:10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.5.2981.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Antunes EB, Vieira D, Dinis-ribeiro M. Linguistic and cultural adaptation into European Portuguese of SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcomes tool for adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Arq Med. 2015;29:6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ginocchio D, Alfonsi E, Mozzanica F, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of SWAL-QOL. Dysphagia. 2016;31:626–34. doi:10.1007/s00455-016-9720-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Demir N, Serel Arslan S, İnal Ö, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the swallow quality of life questionnaire. Türk Fiz ve Rehabil Derg. 2016;27:19–29. doi:10.21653/tfrd.271061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Okalidou A, Kampanaros M. Teacher perceptions of communication impairment at screening stage in preschool children living in Patras, Greece. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001;36:489–502. doi:10.1080/13682820110089399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Malandraki G, Markaki V, Georgopoulos VC, et al. An international pilot study of asynchronous teleconsultation for oropharyngeal dysphagia. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:75–9. doi:10.1177/1357633X12474963.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. CPLOL—Prevention Commission (2005) Dysphagia Review 2004–2005. http://www.cplol.eu/images/Documents/prof_pract/CPLOL_dysphagiareport_en.pdf.

  33. Malandraki G, Markaki V, Georgopoulos V. Postextubation dysphagia in critical patients: a first report from the largest step-down intensive care unit in Greece. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2016;25:150–6. doi:10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fountoulakis KN, Tsolaki M, Chantzi H, Kazis A. Mini mental state examination (MMSE): a validation study in Greece. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2000;15:342–5. doi:10.1177/153331750001500604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McHorney CA, Martin-Harris B, Robbins J, Rosenbek J. Clinical validity of the SWAL-QOL and SWAL-CARE outcome tools with respect to bolus flow measures. Dysphagia. 2006;21:141–8. doi:10.1007/s00455-005-0026-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenbek JC, Jones HN. Dysphagia in movement disorders. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sartorius N, Kuyken W. Translation of health status instruments. Berlin: Springer; 1994. p. 3–18. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_1.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Heal. 2005;8:94–104. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. The Whoqol Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:1569–85. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:299–310. doi:10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ginieri-Coccossis M, Triantafillou E, Tomaras V, et al. Psychometric properties of WHOQOL-BREF in clinical and health Greek populations: incorporating new culture-relevant items. Psychiatrike. 2011;23:130–42.

    Google Scholar 

  42. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0.

  43. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. George D, Mallery M. Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hahn EA, Cella D, Chassany O, et al. Precision of health-related quality-of-life data compared with other clinical measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:1244–54. doi:10.4065/82.10.1244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52:281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the contributors to the translation and back translation of the questionnaire and all the study participants and the clinicians and centers/hospitals who referred patients. We also thank the original developers of the SWAL-QoL, especially Dr. McHorney, for the permission to translate and adapt the original SWAL-QoL into our language. Finally, we acknowledge the authors of the Greek version of the WHOQOL-BREF, especially Dr. Ginieri-Coccossis, for permission of its use in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgia A. Malandraki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Georgopoulos, V.C., Perdikogianni, M., Mouskenteri, M. et al. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the SWAL-QoL Questionnaire in Greek. Dysphagia 33, 91–99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9837-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9837-8

Keywords

Navigation