Skip to main content
Log in

The mental number line electrified: brain potentials in a numerical flanker task

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been suggested that the mental representation of numbers is spatial in nature such that numbers are ordered on a mental number line. In the present investigation we use a variant of the Eriksen flanker task requiring a magnitude decision (smaller or larger than 5) for a central target number by pressing a response button with the right or left hand. The target number is flanked by irrelevant distracters that are either identical to the target, different from the target but biasing the same response, or different from the target and biasing a different response. Response latencies and event-related brain potentials were obtained in a group of healthy adults. Besides the typical response congruency effects on response latency and the N2 component of the ERP, we observed several other effects. First, numerical distance of the target to the standard 5 influenced decision latencies and amplitude and latency of the P3 component with smaller distances leading to longer decision latencies, longer P3 latencies and smaller P3 amplitudes. Second, smaller numerical distance between target and distracters led to faster decisions for response congruent and to slower decisions for response-incongruent trials. For response-incongruent trials P3 amplitude was small/large and P3 latency was long/short for small/large distances. These findings underscore the spatial character of number representation and further show that the relation between targets and distracters, although task irrelevant, is assessed automatically with facilitatory and inhibitory effects driven by spatial distance on the mental number line.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Botvinick, M. M., Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fias, W. (2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect. Psychological Research, 12, 415–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., & D’Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenemans, J. L., Kok, A., & Smulders, F. T. (1993). Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 51–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 31, 557–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, B., Rist, F., & Mattler, U. (1996). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology, 33, 282–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liotti, M., Woldorff, M. G., Perez, R., & Mayberg, H. S. (2000). An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color–word interference effect. Neuropsychologia, 38, 701–711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality [47]. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niedeggen, M., & Rösler, F. (1999). N400 effects reflect activation spread during retrieval of arithmetic facts. Psychological Science, 10, 271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedeggen, M., Rösler, F., & Jost, K. (1999). Processing of incongruous mental calculation problems: evidence for an arithmetic N400 effect. Psychophysiology, 36, 307–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nuerk, H. C., Bauer, F., Krummenacher, J., Heller, D., & Willmes, K. (2005). The power of the mental number line: how the magnitude of unattended numbers affects performance in an Eriksen task. Psychology Science, 47, 34–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, R., & Beatty, J. (1980). Brain events underlying detection and recognition of weak sensory signals. Science, 210, 80–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128–2148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Priftis, K., Piccione, F., Giorgi, F., Meneghello, F., UmiltÃ, C., & Zorzi, M. (2008). Lost in number space after right brain damage: a neural signature of representational neglect. Cortex, 44, 449–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riba, J., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Morte, A., Münte, T. F., & Barbanoj, M. J. (2005). Noradrenergic stimulation enhances human action monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 4370–4374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002). The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vuillemier, P., Ortigue, S., & Brugger, P. (2004). The number space and neglect. Cortex, 40, 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Kong, J., Tang, X., Zhuang, D., & Li, S. (2000). Event-related potential N270 is elicited by mental conflict processing in human brain. Neuroscience Letters, 293, 17–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, M., Heldmann, M., Münte, T. F., & Kluwe, R. H. (2007). Disentangling sequential effects of stimulus- and response-related conflict and stimulus-response repetition using brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1104–1112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umilta, C. (2006). The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: evidence from neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1061–1067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umilta, C. (2002). Brain damage: neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by grants from the DFG (SFB 779-A5) to TFM. Also supported by the BMBF (contract 01GO0202).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas F. Münte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fellbrich, A., Nager, W. & Münte, T.F. The mental number line electrified: brain potentials in a numerical flanker task. Psychological Research 76, 229–235 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0409-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0409-5

Keywords

Navigation