Skip to main content
Log in

The MELD score predicts the short-term and overall survival after liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or autoimmune liver diseases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Liver transplantation (LT) is well established in patients with autoimmune liver disease. Despite excellent outcomes, organ scarcity demands careful patients’ selection and timing of transplantation.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzes data of 79 consecutive patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and overlap syndrome, undergoing LT between 2001 and 2012. Overall survival (OS) and graft survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimate. Multivariate survival analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors by using Cox regression model.

Results

After 59.6-month median follow-up, the 5-year OS and graft survival were 75.3 and 68.8 %, respectively. The 5-year survival rates for patients with PSC (n = 57), AIH (n = 17), and overlap syndrome (n = 5) were 76.3, 76.0, and 60.0 %. The 90-day mortality rate of 70.0 % was significantly higher in patients with a labMELD score ≥20 (n = 10) compared to 26.1 % in 69 patients with a labMELD <20 (p = 0.009). A lab Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥20 was an independent predictor of impaired OS (p = 0.050, hazard ratio 2.5). The 5-year OS was 55.7 % in patients with a labMELD score ≥20 compared to 84.7 % in patients with a labMELD score <20.

Conclusion

The recipients’ MELD score is a predictor for the short-term outcome after LT in patients with autoimmune liver disease. Meticulous selection for transplant listing remains necessary to safe scarce donor organs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AIH:

Autoimmune hepatitis

CCC:

Cholangiocarcinoma

ERC:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

IQR:

Interquartile range

IVC:

Inferior vena cava

IBD:

Inflammatory bowel disease

LFTs:

Liver function tests

LT:

Liver transplantation

OS:

Overall survival

PBC:

Primary biliary cirrhosis

PSC:

Primary sclerosing cholangitis

References

  1. Bjoro K, Brandsaeter B, Foss A, Schrumpf E (2006) Liver transplantation in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Semin Liver Dis 26(1):69–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mottershead M, Neuberger J (2008) Transplantation in autoimmune liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol 14(21):3388–3395

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogel A, Heinrich E, Bahr MJ et al (2004) Long-term outcome of liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis. Clin Transplant 18(1):62–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia CE, Garcia RF, Gunson B et al (2004) Analysis of marginal donor parameters in liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis. Exp Clin Transplant 2:183–188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Silveira MG, Talwalkar JA, Angulo P, Lindor KD (2007) Overlap of autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis: long-term outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 102(6):1244–1250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krawitt EL (2006) Autoimmune hepatitis. N Engl J Med 354(1):54–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan MM, Gershwin ME (2005) Primary biliary cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 353(12):1261–1273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, Netherlands. personal cummunication (2010)

  9. Devlin J, O’Grady J (1999) Indications for referral and assessment in adult liver transplantation: a clinical guideline. Br Soc Gastroenterol Gut 45(Suppl 6):VI1–VI22

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mendes FD, Kim WR, Pedersen R, Therneau T, Lindor KD (2008) Mortality attributable to cholestatic liver disease in the United States. Hepatology 47(4):1241–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Graziadei IW, Wiesner RH, Marotta PJ et al (1999) Long-term results of patients undergoing liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 30(5):1121–1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Floreani A, Niro G, Rosa RE et al (2006) Type I autoimmune hepatitis: clinical course and outcome in an Italian multicentre study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24(7):1051–1057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khalaf H, Mourad W, El-Sheikh Y et al (2007) Liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis: a single-center experience. Transplant Proc 39(4):1166–1170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rust C, Beuers U (2008) Overlap syndromes among autoimmune liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol 14(21):3368–3373

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alvarez F, Berg PA, Bianchi FB et al (1999) International autoimmune hepatitis group report: review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol 31(5):929–938, 18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Belghiti J, Panis Y, Sauvanet A, Gayet B, Fekete F (1992) A new technique of side to side caval anastomosis during orthotopic hepatic transplantation without inferior vena caval occlusion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175(3):270–272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffmann K, Weigand M, Hillebrand N, Büchler MW, Schmidt J, Schemmer P (2009) Is veno-venous bypass still needed during liver transplantation? A review of the literature. Clin Transplant 23(1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bruns H, Lozanovski VJ, Schultze D et al (2014) Prediction of postoperative mortality in liver transplantation in the era of MELD-based liver allocation: a multivariate analysis. PLoS ONE 9(6):e98782

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mailey B, Buchberg B, Prendergast C et al (2009) A disease-based comparison of liver transplantation outcomes. Am Surg 75(10):901–908

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klose J, Klose MA, Metz C, et al. (2014) Outcome stagnation of liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease era. Langenbecks Arch Surg

  22. Guo Z, He X, Wu L et al (2010) Model for end-stage liver disease versus the Child-Pugh score in predicting the post-transplant 3-month and 1-year mortality in a cohort of Chinese recipients. Surg Today 40(1):38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Forman LM, Lucey MR (2001) Predicting the prognosis of chronic liver disease: an evolution from child to MELD. Mayo end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 33(2):473–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weismuller TJ, Fikatas P, Schmidt J et al (2011) Multicentric evaluation of model for end-stage liver disease-based allocation and survival after liver transplantation in Germany—limitations of the ‘sickest first’-concept. Transpl Int 24(1):91–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bruns H, Hillebrand N, Schneider T et al (2011) LabMELD-based organ allocation increases total costs of liver transplantation: a single-center experience. Clin Transplant 25(5):E558–E565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. David AI, Coelho MP, Paes AT et al (2012) Liver transplant outcome: a comparison between high and low MELD score recipients. Einstein Sao Paulo 10(1):57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Veit C, Bauer J, Döbler K, Eckert O, Woldenga C Qualität sichtbar machen. bqs-qualitätsreport 2007. BQS Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH 2008

  28. Brandao A, Fuchs SC, Gleisner AL, Marroni C, Zanotelli ML, Cantisani G (2009) MELD and other predictors of survival after liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 23(2):220–227, 19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bonney GK, Aldersley MA, Asthana S et al (2009) Donor risk index and MELD interactions in predicting long-term graft survival: a single-centre experience. Transplantation 87(12):1858–1863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Onaca NN, Levy MF, Sanchez EQ et al (2003) A correlation between the pretransplantation MELD score and mortality in the first two years after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 9(2):117–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kamath PS, Kim WR (2007) The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology 45(3):797–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Habib S, Berk B, Chang CC et al (2006) MELD and prediction of post-liver transplantation survival. Liver Transpl 12(3):440–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Schemmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoffmann, K., Hinz, U., Hillebrand, N. et al. The MELD score predicts the short-term and overall survival after liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or autoimmune liver diseases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399, 1001–1009 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1237-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1237-z

Keywords

Navigation