Skip to main content
Log in

Shoulder muscle activation strategies differ when lifting or lowering a load

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Lowering a load could be associated with abnormal shoulder and scapular motion. We tested the hypothesis that lowering a load involves different shoulder muscle coordination strategies compared to lifting a load.

Methods

EMG activity of 13 muscles was recorded in 30 healthy volunteers who lifted and lowered a 6, 12 or 18 kg box between three shelves. Kinematics, EMG levels and muscle synergies, extracted using non-negative matrix factorization, were analyzed.

Results

We found greater muscle activity level during lowering in four muscles (+ 1–2% MVC in anterior deltoid, biceps brachii, serratus anterior and pectoralis major). The movements were performed faster during lifting (18.2 vs. 15.9 cm/s) but with similar hand paths and segment kinematics. The number of synergies was the same in both tasks. Two synergies were identified in ~ 75% of subjects, and one synergy in the others. Synergy #1 mainly activated prime movers’ muscles, while synergy #2 co-activated several antagonist muscles. Synergies’ structure was similar between lifting and lowering (Pearson’s r ≈ 0.9 for synergy #1 and 0.7–08 for synergy #2). Synergy #2 was more activated during lowering and explained the greater activity observed in anterior deltoid, serratus anterior and pectoralis.

Conclusion

Lifting and lowering a load were associated with similar synergy structure. In 3/4 of subjects, lowering movements involved greater activation of a “multiple antagonists” synergy. The other subjects co-contracted all shoulder muscles as a unit in both conditions. These inter-individual differences should be investigated in the occurrence of shoulder musculoskeletal disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BB:

biceps brachii

DeltA:

deltoid (Anterior part)

DeltM:

deltoid (Middle part)

DeltP:

deltoid (Posterior part) of the deltoid

InfE:

infraspinatus

LD:

latissimus dorsi

MVC:

Maximal voluntary contraction

Pect:

pectoralis major

SerrA:

serratus anterior

SubS:

lower subscapularis

SupE:

supraspinatus

TB:

triceps brachii

TraS:

trapezius (Superior part)

TraL:

trapezius (Lower part)

VAF:

Variance accounted for

References

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by IRSST (#2014-0045) and NSERC discovery grants program (RGPIN-2014-0391) in Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NAT, RM and MB wrote the paper. NAT analyzed the data. RM and MB performed the experiments. MB designed the study. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas A. Turpin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Toshio Moritani.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 194 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turpin, N.A., Martinez, R. & Begon, M. Shoulder muscle activation strategies differ when lifting or lowering a load. Eur J Appl Physiol 120, 2417–2429 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04464-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04464-9

Keywords

Navigation