Skip to main content
Log in

Antiplatelet pretreatment and outcomes in intravenous thrombolysis for stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since there are contradictory data regarding the association of antiplatelet pretreatment (AP) with safety and efficacy outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) to investigate the association of AP with outcomes of AIS patients treated with intravenous alteplase. The outcome events of interest included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), fatal ICH, complete recanalization (CR), 3-month favorable functional outcome (FFO, mRS score 0–1), 3-month functional independence (FI, mRS score 0–2), and mortality. The corresponding odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for all the outcome events using random-effects model. The adjusted age and admission NIHSS OR (ORadjusted) were also estimated for all available outcomes. We included 7 RCTs (4376 patients, 33.7% with AP). In unadjusted analyses, AP was associated with higher likelihood of sICH (OR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.40–2.56), death (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.24–2.03), and lower likelihood of 3-month FI (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.85). No association was detected between AP and fatal ICH (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 0.75–3.15), 3-month FFO (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.58–1.07), and CR (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.04–11.66). After adjustment for age and admission stroke severity, AP was not related to sICH (ORadjusted = 1.67, 95% CI 0.75–3.72), 3-month FI (ORadjusted = 0.88, 95% CI 0.54–1.42), or death (ORadjusted = 1.01, 95% CI 0.55–1.86) in adjusted analyses. In conclusion, after adjusting for confounders, AP was not associated with a higher risk of sICH and worse 3-month functional outcome in AIS treated with intravenous alteplase. Antiplatelet intake prior to tPA-bolus should not be used as a reason to withhold or lower alteplase dose in AIS patients treated with IVT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr et al (2013) Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 44:870–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hacke W, Lichy C (2008) Thrombolysis for acute stroke under antiplatelet therapy: safe enough to be beneficial? Nat Clin Pract Neurol 4:474–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Uyttenboogaart M, Luijckx GJ (2010) Intravenous thrombolysis for patients with ischaemic stroke on antiplatelet therapy: a blessing in disguise? Eur J Neurol 17:177–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zinkstok SM, Beenen LF, Majoie CB, Marquering HA, de Haan RJ, Roos YB (2014) Early deterioration after thrombolysis plus aspirin in acute stroke: a post hoc analysis of the Antiplatelet Therapy in Combination with Recombinant t-PA Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke trial. Stroke 45:3080–3082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson CS, Robinson T, Lindley RI et al (2016) Low-dose versus standard-dose intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 374:2313–2323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson T, Lindley R, Lavados P et al (2016) Benefits and risks of low versus standard-dose alteplase in patients with prior antiplatelet therapy: the ENCHANTED trial (ESOC6-1434). Eur Stroke J 1:711

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The prisma statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62:e1–e34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsivgoulis G, Zand R, Katsanos AH et al (2016) Risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and high cerebral microbleed burden: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 73:675–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsivgoulis G, Zand R, Katsanos AH et al (2015) Safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis in dissection-related ischemic stroke: an international multicenter study and comprehensive meta-analysis of reported case series. J Neurol 262:2135–2143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsivgoulis G, Ribo M, Rubiera M et al (2013) Real-time validation of transcranial Doppler criteria in assessing recanalization during intra-arterial procedures for acute ischemic stroke: an international, multicenter study. Stroke 44:394–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC et al (2011) The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bero LA (2013) Why the Cochrane risk of bias tool should include funding source as a standard item [editorial]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:000075

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strbian D, Seiffge DJ, Breuer L et al (2013) Validation of the DRAGON score in 12 stroke centers in anterior and posterior circulation. Stroke 44:2718–2721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strbian D, Engelter S, Michel P et al (2012) Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis: the SEDAN score. Ann Neurol 71:634–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsivgoulis G, Katsanos AH, Mavridis D, Magoufis G, Arthur A, Alexandrov AV (2016) Mechanical thrombectomy improves functional outcomes independent of pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke 47:1661–1664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG (2008) Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions website. http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_9/9_analysing_data_and_undertaking_meta_analyses.htm. Updated March 2011. Accessed 4 Feb 2014

  17. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP et al (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsivgoulis G, Zand R, Katsanos AH et al (2015) Safety of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke mimics: prospective 5-year study and comprehensive meta-analysis. Stroke 46:1281–1287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goyal N, Tsivgoulis G, Zand R et al (2015) Systemic thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurology 85:1452–1458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Alexandrov AV, Molina CA, Grotta JC et al (2004) Ultrasound-enhanced systemic thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 351:2170–2178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C et al (1998) Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet 352:1245–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E et al (2008) Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 359:1317–1329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sandercock P, Wardlaw JM, Lindley RI et al (2012) The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the third international stroke trial [IST-3]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:2352–2363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group (1995) Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 333:1581–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Molina CA, Barreto AD, Tsivgoulis G et al (2009) Transcranial ultrasound in clinical sonothrombolysis (TUCSON) trial. Ann Neurol 66:28–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Larrue V, von Kummer R, Müller A, Bluhmki E (2001) Risk factors for severe hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: a secondary analysis of the European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study (ECASS II). Stroke 32:438–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bluhmki E, Chamorro A, Dávalos A et al (2009) Stroke treatment with alteplase given 3.0–4.5 h after onset of acute ischaemicstroke (ECASS III): additional outcomes and subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 8:1095–1102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lindley RI, Wardlaw JM, Whiteley WN et al (2015) Alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: outcomes by clinically important subgroups in the Third International Stroke Trial. Stroke 46:746–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dachs RJ, Burton JH, Joslin J (2008) A user’s guide to the NINDS rt-PA stroke trial database. PLoS Med 5:e113

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Saqqur M, Tsivgoulis G, Molina CA et al (2008) Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and recanalization after IV rt-PA: a multicenter study. Neurology 71:1304–1312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen S, Lu X, Zhang W et al (2016) Does prior antiplatelet treatment increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation and unfavorable outcome on day 90 after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 25:1366–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Enomoto Y, Yoshimura S, Egashira Y, Yamagami H, Sakai N (2016) The risk of intracranial hemorrhage in japanese patients with acute large vessel occlusion; subanalysis of the RESCUE-Japan registry. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 25:1076–1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dorado L, Millán M, de la Ossa NP et al (2010) Influence of antiplatelet pre-treatment on the risk of intracranial haemorrhage in acute ischaemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis. Eur J Neurol 17:301–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Meseguer E, Labreuche J, Guidoux C et al (2015) Outcomes after stroke thrombolysis according to prior antiplatelet use. Int J Stroke 10:163–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ibrahim MM, Sebastian J, Hussain M et al (2010) Does current oral antiplatelet agent or subtherapeutic anticoagulation use have an effect on tissue-plasminogen-activator-mediated recanalization rate in patients with acute ischemic stroke? Cerebrovasc Dis 30:508–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Luo S, Zhuang M, Zeng W, Tao J (2016) Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies. J Am Heart Assoc. doi:10.1161/JAHA.116.003242

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pan X, Zhu Y, Zheng D, Liu Y, Yu F, Yang J (2015) Prior antiplatelet agent use and outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. Int J Stroke 10:317–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ (1995) Users’ guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 274:1800–1804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pan Y, Chen Q, Liao X et al (2015) Preexisting dual antiplatelet treatment increases the risk of post-thrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage in Chinese stroke patients. Neurol Res 37:64–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Diedler J, Ahmed N, Sykora M et al (2010) Safety of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy at stroke onset. Stroke 41:288–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design of the study: GT, AHK, PDS, and AVA. Acquisition of data: GT and AHK. Analysis of data: GT and AHK. Drafting the manuscript: GT, AHK, RZ, VKS, MK, SG, ED, AWA, PDM, PDS, and AVA.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgios Tsivgoulis.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Sources of funding

Dr. Georgios Tsivgoulis has been supported by European Regional Development Fund—Project FNUSA-ICRC (No. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 56 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsivgoulis, G., Katsanos, A.H., Zand, R. et al. Antiplatelet pretreatment and outcomes in intravenous thrombolysis for stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 264, 1227–1235 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8520-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8520-1

Keywords

Navigation