Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of sodium hypochlorite decontamination on the DNA recovery from human teeth

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic identification of skeletal human remains is often realized by short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping of nuclear DNA. Dental DNA is preferred to DNA from bone for the better protection of the endogenous DNA. Especially if whole tooth grinding is intended to access the DNA, contaminations with exogenous DNA have to be avoided. The immersion of the tooth in sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl, known as bleach) is one common procedure to clean the outer surface from extraneous DNA and PCR inhibitors. To investigate the impact of bleaching on endogenous DNA and the decontamination success, 71 recently extracted teeth were differently treated with sodium hypochlorite (2.5 or 5.0% NaOCl for 30 or 60 s, 5.0% NaOCl for 10 min, and control group) in the beginning of the extraction process, whereas equally handled afterwards. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the extracted DNA was performed. There was a great variation for the DNA concentration of the extracts even within a group of the same NaOCl treatment. Complete DNA profiles from single persons with alleles for the 16 ESS (European Standard Set) STR loci were obtained for all regarded teeth. A statistically significant difference between the DNA yields of the treatment groups was not determined. Moreover, a negative effect of NaOCl (2.5% and 5.0%) on the DNA recovery could not be observed. Significant larger amounts of DNA were extracted from anterior teeth in contrast to posterior teeth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sosa C, Baeta M, Núñez C et al (2012) Nuclear DNA typing from ancient teeth. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 33(3):211–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181fe3401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ricaut F-X, Keyser-Tracqui C, Crubezy E et al (2005) STR-genotyping from human medieval tooth and bone samples. Forensic Sci Int 151(1):31–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.07.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Poetsch L, Meyer U, Rothschild S et al (1992) Application of DNA techniques for identification using human dental pulp as a source of DNA. Int J Legal Med 105(3):139–143

  4. Sweet DJ, Sweet CH (1995) DNA analysis of dental pulp to link incinerated remains of homicide victim to crime scene. J Forensic Sci 40(2):310–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prinz M, Carracedo A, Mayr WR et al (2007) DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci Int Genet 1(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2006.10.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alonso A, Andelinović S, Martín P et al (2001) DNA typing from skeletal remains: evaluation of multiplex and megaplex STR systems on DNA isolated from bone and teeth samples. Croat Med J 42(3):260–266

  7. Mundorff A, Davoren IM (2014) Examination of DNA yield rates for different skeletal elements at increasing post mortem intervals. Forensic Sci Int Genet 8(1):55–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Malaver PC, Yunis JJ (2003) Different dental tissues as source of DNA for human identification in forensic cases. Croat Med J 44(3):306–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. von Wurmb-Schwark N, Heinrich A, Freudenberg M et al (2008) The impact of DNA contamination of bone samples in forensic case analysis and anthropological research. Legal Med 10(3):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Korlević P, Gerber T, Gansauge M-T et al (2015) Reducing microbial and human contamination in DNA extractions from ancient bones and teeth. BioTechniques 59(2):87–93. https://doi.org/10.2144/000114320

  11. Prince AM, Andrus L (1992) PCR: how to kill unwanted DNA. BioTechniques 12(3):358–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Szkuta B, Ballantyne KN, van Oorschot R (2015) Potential degrading effect of sodium hypochlorite on exhibits containing DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet Supplement Series 5:e52–e54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kampmann M-L, Borsting C, Morling N (2017) Decrease DNA contamination in the laboratories. Forensic Sci Int Genet Supplement Series 6:e577–e578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kemp BM, Smith DG (2005) Use of bleach to eliminate contaminating DNA from the surface of bones and teeth. Forensic Sci Int 154(1):53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prutz WA (1996) Hypochlorous acid interactions with thiols, nucleotides, DNA, and other biological substrates. Arch Biochem Biophys 332(1):110–120. https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1996.0322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukuzaki S (2006) Mechanisms of actions of sodium hypochlorite in cleaning and disinfection processes. Biocontrol Sci 11(4):147–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Opel KL, Chung D, McCord BR (2010) A study of PCR inhibition mechanisms using real time PCR. J Forensic Sci 55(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01245.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinchi V, Torricelli F, Nutini AL et al (2011) Techniques of dental DNA extraction: some operative experiences. Forensic Sci Int 204(1-3):111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.05.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Higgins D, Kaidonis J, Austin J et al (2011) Dentine and cementum as sources of nuclear DNA for use in human identification. Aust J Forensic Sci 43(4):287–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2011.583278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Higgins D, Austin JJ (2013) Teeth as a source of DNA for forensic identification of human remains: a Review. Sci Justice 53(4):433–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2013.06.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins D, Kaidonis J, Townsend G et al (2013) Targeted sampling of cementum for recovery of nuclear DNA from human teeth and the impact of common decontamination measures. Investig Genet 4(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-4-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Milos A, Selmanović A, Smajlović L et al (2007) Success rates of nuclear short tandem repeat typing from different skeletal elements. Croat Medical J 48(4):486–493

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pajnic IZ (2016) Extraction of DNA from human skeletal material. In: Goodwin W (ed) Forensic DNA typing protocols, methods in molecular biology, vol 1420. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, pp 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3597-0_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Gaytmenn R, Sweet D (2003) Quantification of forensic DNA from various regions of human teeth. J Forensic Sci 48(3):622–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dobberstein RC, Huppertz J, von Wurmb-Schwark N et al (2008) Degradation of biomolecules in artificially and naturally aged teeth: Implications for age estimation based on aspartic acid racemization and DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Int 179(2-3):181–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rubio L, Martinez LJ, Martinez E et al (2009) Study of short- and long-term storage of teeth and its influence on DNA. J Forensic Sci 54(6):1411–1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01159.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernick S, Nedelman C (1975) Effect of aging on the human pulp. J Endod 1(3):88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80024-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nitzan DW, Michaeli Y, Weinreb M et al (1986) The effect of aging on tooth morphology: a study on impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 61(1):54–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rubio L, Santos I, Gaitan MJ et al (2013) Time-dependent changes in DNA stability in decomposing teeth over 18 months. Acta Odontol Scand 71(3-4):638–643. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.700068

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the dentists for providing us with tooth samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Koehn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee at the Rostock University Medical Center (A 2016-0226).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koehn, K., Buettner, A. & Lindner, I. Effect of sodium hypochlorite decontamination on the DNA recovery from human teeth. Int J Legal Med 134, 93–99 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02174-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02174-2

Keywords

Navigation