Skip to main content
Log in

Open partial horizontal laryngectomy and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a multicenter Italian experience

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the functional and oncologic outcomes of adjuvant (chemo)radiation [(C)RT] after open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHLs).

Methods

Multicenter retrospective evaluation of 130 patients (116 males, 14 females) submitted between 1995 and 2017 to OPHL Types II and III for laryngeal cancer and receiving adjuvant (C)RT for one or more of the following risk factors at histopathologic examination of the surgical specimen: pT4a and/or > pN2a categories, close/positive resection margins, or presence of both perineural (PNI) and lympho-vascular invasion (LVI). The primary study endpoints were evaluation of the presence of tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy at last follow-up, and calculation of laryngo-esophageal dysfunction-free survival (LEDFS).

Results

Mean age of the study cohort was 60.8 ± 8.9 years (median, 62; interquartile range [IQR], 13). Mean follow-up was 50.7 ± 39.4 months (range 24–188; median, 38; IQR, 51). Adjuvant therapy consisted of CRT in 53 (41%) patients, and RT alone in 77 (59%). Five-year LEDFS was 85%. Overall survival was 71.5%, while 13% of patients remained tracheostomy- and 3% gastrostomy-dependent at the last follow-up. The only significant variable in predicting survival (p = 0.020) was tracheostomy dependence: it was maintained in 7.5% of subjects after OPHL Type II and in 34% of those submitted to OHPL Type III (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In selected patients affected by advanced laryngeal cancer, OPHLs Type II and III have a relatively good laryngeal safety profile and provide favorable oncologic outcomes even in case of need for adjuvant (C)RT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, RL, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Forastiere A, Lewin JS, Nathan CA et al (2018) Use of larynx-preservation strategies in the treatment of laryngeal cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 36:1143–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Majer E, Rieder W (1959) Technique de laryngectomiepermettant de conserver la perméabilitérespiratoire (la crico-hyoidopexie). Ann OtolaryngolChirCervicofac 76:677–681

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Labayle J, Bismuth R (1971) Laryngectomietotale avec reconstruction. Ann OtolaryngolChirCervicofac 88:219–228

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pique JJ, Desaulty A, Decroix G (1974) Crico-hyoido-épiglottopexie. Technique opératoire et résultatsfonctionnels. Ann OtolaryngolChirCervicofac 91:681–689

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rizzotto G, Succo G, Lucioni M, Pazzaia T (2006) Subtotal laryngectomy with tracheoioidopexy: a possible alternative to total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 116:1907–1917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Succo G, Peretti G, Piazza C et al (2014) Open partial horizontal laryngectomies: a proposal for classification by the working committee on nomenclature of the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:2489–2496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Riga M, Chelis L, Danielides V, Vogiatzaki T, Pantazis T, Pantazis D (2016) Systematic review on T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: still far from a consensus on the optimal organ preserving treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Succo G, Crosetti E, Bertolin A et al (2015) Benefits and drawbacks of open partial horizontal laryngectomies, part B: intermediate and selected advanced stage laryngeal carcinoma. Head Neck 33:649–657

    Google Scholar 

  9. Strojan P, Haigentz M Jr, Bradford CR et al (2013) Chemoradiotherapy vs. total laryngectomy for primary treatment of advanced laryngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol 49:283–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marchi F, Filauro M, Missale, et al (2019) A Multidisciplinary team guided approach to the management of cT3 laryngeal cancer: a retrospective analysis of 104 cases. Cancers (Basel) 11(5):717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maroldi R, Ravanelli R, Farina D (2014) Magnetic resonance for laryngeal cancer. CurrOpinOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg 22(2):131–139

    Google Scholar 

  12. Piazza C, Cocco D, Del Bon F, Mangili S, Nicolai P, Peretti G (2011) Narrow band imaging and high definition television in the endoscopic evaluation of upper aero-digestive tract cancer. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 31:70–75

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Colevas AD, Yom SS, Pfister DG et al (2018) NCCN Guidelines® insights head and neck cancers featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl ComprCancNetw 16:479–490

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C et al (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 8th edn. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simo R, Bradley P, Chevalier D et al (2014) European Laryngological Society: ELS recommendations for the follow up of patients treated for laryngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:2469–2479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marchi F, Piazza C, Ravanelli M et al (2017) Role of imaging in the follow-up of T2–T3 glottic cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(10):3679–3686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laccourreye O, Hans S, Borzog-Grayeli A, Maulard-Durdux C, Brasnu D, Housset M (2000) Complications of postoperative radiation therapy after partial laryngectomy in supraglottic cancer: a long term evaluation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:752–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Alterio D, Ansarin M, Jereczek-Fossa BA et al (2013) What is the price of functional surgical organ preservation in local-regionally advanced supraglottic cancer? Long term outcome for partial laryngectomy followed by radiotherapy in 32 patients. Tumori 99:667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Buglione M, Pedretti S, Costa L et al (2015) Clinical outcomes and toxicity after exclusive versus postoperative radiotherapy in supraglottic cancer: new solutions for old problems? The case of stage I and II disease. Radiol Med 120(11):1071–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Costa L, Pedretti S, Foscarini F et al (2016) Clinical outcomes and toxicity after exclusive versus postoperative radiotherapy in supraglottic cancer: new solutions for old problems? The case of stage III and IV disease. Radiol Med 121(1):70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guzzo M, Ferraro L, Rezzonico S et al (2011) Open organ preservation surgery of the larynx: experience of IstitutoNazionaleTumori of Milan. Head Neck 33(5):673–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forastiere AA, Zhang Q, Weber RS et al (2013) Long-term results of RTOG 91–11: a comparison of three nonsurgical treatment strategies to preserve the larynx in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:845–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M et al (2003) Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 349:2091–2098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Del Bon F, Piazza C, Lancini D, et al (2019) Open partial horizontal laryngectomies for T3-T4 laryngeal cancer: Prognostic impact of anterior vs. posterior laryngeal compartmentalization. Cancers (Basel) 11(3): E289

  25. Dyckhoff G, Plinkert PK, Ramroth R (2017) A change in the study evaluation paradigm reveals that larynx preservation compromises survival in T4 laryngeal cancer patients. BMC Cancer 17:609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Gilani M, Skillington SA, Kallogjeri D, Haughey B, Piccirillo JF (2016) Surgical vs. non surgical treatment modalities for T3 glottic squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142:940–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Al-Mamgani A, Navran A, Walraven I, Schreuder WH, Tesselaar MET, Klop WMC (2019) Organ-preservation (chemo)radiotherapy for T4 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: is the effort worth? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(2):575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Beitler JJ, Ridge JA, Vermorken JB et al (2018) T4 laryngeal cancer with good function: should we be reluctant to treat without surgery? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 102(5):1400–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT, Mancuso AA, Pameijer FJ, Stringer SP, Cassisi NJ (1997) Definitive radiotherapy for T3 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx. J Clin Oncol 15:2394–2402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. MacKenzie R, Franssen E, Balogh J, Birt D, Gilbert R (1998) The prognostic significance of tracheostomy in carcinoma of the larynx treated with radiotherapy and surgery for salvage. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41:43–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Giacalone NJ, Qureshi MM, Mak KS et al (2017) Adjuvant chemoradiation does not improve survival in elderly patients with high-risk resected head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 128:831–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pellini R, Mercante G, Marchese C, Terenzi V, Sperduti I, Manciocco V, Ruscito P, Cristalli G, Marchesi P, Pichi B, Spriano G (2013) Predictive factors for postoperative wound complications after neck dissection. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 33(1):16–22

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Li M, Zhang T, Tan B, Yu M, Zhang B (2019) Role of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced laryngeal cancer: a meta-analysis. Acta Otolaryngol 139:172–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen MM, Colevas AD, Megwalu U, Divi V (2018) Survival benefit of post-operative chemotherapy for intermediate-risk advanced stage head and neck cancer differs with patient age. Oral Oncol 84:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sanabria A, Carvalho A, Vartanian J, Magrin J, Ikeda M, Kowalski L (2007) Factors that influence treatment decision in older patients with resectable head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 117:835–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kanwar A, Hutcheson KA, Ghosh A et al (2018) Age-adjusted comorbidity and survival in locally advanced laryngeal cancer. Head Neck 40:2060–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Funding

Authors declare that they didn't receive any financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Lenzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the first author's (LM) affiliation.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muscatello, L., Piazza, C., Peretti, G. et al. Open partial horizontal laryngectomy and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a multicenter Italian experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 4059–4065 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06651-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06651-6

Keywords

Navigation