Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in elastic properties of the nasal tip using Columellar strut graft versus tongue-in-groove method over one year after rhinoplasty

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In this study, we decided to investigate the changes in elasticity of the nasal tip using Columellar strut graft versus toung in groove method over a year after rhinoplasty.

Materials and methods

In this before-after randomized clinical trial study, 44 candidates for rhinoplasty were enrolled Columellar strut graft group (n = 22) and toung in groove group (n = 22). Also 22 patients who referred to ENT clinic without any previous rhinoplasty and without any decision for it during the next year, considered as control group. One group underwent columellar strut graft and the other one underwent tongue in groove rhinoplasty and in control group participants received no intervention. Nasolabial angle and elasticity of the nasal tip were recorded and compared before the surgery, immediately after the surgery, 3 months and one year after the surgery.

Result

There was no significant difference between the mean elasticity of the nose and the nasolabial angle before the surgery, immediately after the surgery and 3 months after the surgery between the groups. However, there was significant differences in the mean elasticity of the nose and the nasolabial angle between the groups one year after the surgery (P value < 0.05). Pearson correlation coefficient test showed a significant correlation between nasal tip elasticity 3 months and 1 year after rhinoplasty (P = 0.032, r = 0.459) and nasolabial angle 3 months and 1 year after rhinoplasty (P = 0.045, r = 0.431).

Conclusion

According to the results, it can be concluded that the both the Columellar strut graft and toung in groove methods improve elastic properties of the nasal tip and nasolabial angle after rhinoplasty compare to the control group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dobratz EJ, Tran V, Hilger PA (2010) Comparison of techniques used to support the nasal tip and their long-term effects on tip position. Arch Facial Plast Surg 12(3):172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Papanastasiou S, Logan A (2000) Management of the overprojecting nasal tip: a review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 24(5):353–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Toriumi DM (2006) New concepts in nasal tip contouring. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8(3):156–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Datema FR, Lohuis PJ (2016) The tongue-in-groove technique in primary and revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 32(04):416–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Indeyeva Y, Lee T, Gordin E, Chan D, Ducic Y (2018) Traction suture modification to tongue-in-groove caudal septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(2):180–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beaty MM, Dyer WK, Shawl MW (2002) The quantification of surgical changes in nasal tip support. Arch Facial Plast Surg 4(2):82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sadeghi M, Saedi B, Sazegar AA, Amiri M (2009) The role of columellar struts to gain and maintain tip projection and rotation: a randomized blinded trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy 23(6):e47–e50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fatemi MJ, Rajabi F, Moosavi SJ, Soltani M (2012) Quality of life among Iranian adults before and after rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(2):448–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Atighechi S, Dadgarnia M, Vaziribozorg S, Jokar Z, Sadeghmanesh R (2018) The effect of lateral crural overlay surgical technique on elasticity of nasal ala. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(5):1235–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Atighechi S, Tari N, Baradaranfar M, Dadgarnia M, Zand V, Meybodian M et al (2019) Changes in nasal tip and lateral nostril characteristics after the semi-tongue-in-groove technique in open rhinoplasty surgery. J Craniofac Surg 30(3):e192–e195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rohrich RJ, Kurkjian TJ, Hoxworth RE, Stephan PJ, Mojallal A (2012) The effect of the columellar strut graft on nasal tip position in primary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(4):926–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Willson TJ, Swiss T, Barrera JE (2015) Quantifying changes in nasal tip support. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 17(6):428–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yaberi R, Amali A, Emami H, Saedi B (2018) A comparison of the tongue-in-groove and columellar strut in creating and maintaining tip projection and rotation: a randomized single blind trial. Eur J Plast Surg 41(3):293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Demir UL (2018) Comparison of tongue-in-groove and columellar strut on rotation and projection in droopy nasal tip: contribution of a cap graft. J Craniofac Surg 29(3):558–561

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shah A, Pfaff M, Kinsman G, Steinbacher DM (2015) Alar-columellar and lateral nostril changes following tongue-in-groove rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39(2):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lohuis PJ, Datema FR (2015) Patient satisfaction in C aucasian and M editerranean open rhinoplasty using the tongue-in-groove technique: Prospective statistical analysis of change in subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance following aesthetic rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 125(4):831–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shima Shirkhoda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Study protocol was in accordance with the latest Declaration of Helsinki for medical research involving human subjects and was approved by local ethics committee (IR.SSU.MEDICINE.REC.1394.483). This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants of the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atighechi, S., Dadgarnia, M., Vaziribozorg, S. et al. Changes in elastic properties of the nasal tip using Columellar strut graft versus tongue-in-groove method over one year after rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277, 147–150 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05662-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05662-8

Keywords

Navigation