Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Otorhinolaryngology litigations in Japan

  • Miscellaneous
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the malpractice litigations pertaining to otorhinolaryngology in Japan.

Methods

A retrospective review was undertaken of cases tried in the Japanese civil court system during the 26-year period from 1990 to 2015 as identified in a computerized legal database. Data including patient demographics, disease, chief allegations, court’s decisions, and the year decision was made were collected and analyzed. Patients’ chief allegations were assigned to one of the five categories: delayed diagnosis, complication during diagnostic procedure, inappropriate treatment, complication during treatment procedure, or lack of informed consent.

Results

Thirty-one malpractice litigations were identified. Eight (26%) malpractice litigations pertained to tumors, 1 (3%) to a tumor-like lesion, 14 (45%) to inflammation, and 8 (26%) to others. Among the patients’ chief allegations, inappropriate treatment and complication during treatment procedure were the most frequent [11 (36%) for each], followed by delayed diagnosis [6 (19%)], complication during diagnostic procedure [2 (6%)], and lack of informed consent [1 (3%)].

Conclusion

These data may aid in the design of risk-prevention strategies to be used by otorhinolaryngologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Song SA, Tolisano AM, Camacho M (2016) Laryngology litigation in the United States: thirty years in review. Laryngoscope 126:2301–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong SS, Yheulon CG, Wirtz ED et al (2014) Otolaryngology and medical malpractice: a review of the past decade, 2001–2011. Larygoscope 124:896–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tolisano AM, Bager JM (2014) Sleep surgery and medical malpractice. Laryngoscope 124:E250–E254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong SS, Yheulon CG, Sniezek JC (2013) Salivary gland surgery and medical malpractice. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148:589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruhl DS, Hong SS, Littlefield PD (2013) Lessons learned in otologic surgery: 30 years of malpractice cases in the United States. Otol Neurotol 34:1173–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Svider PF, Sunaryo PL, Keeley BR et al (2013) Characterizing liability for cranial nerve injuries: a detailed analysis of 209 malpractice trials. Laryngoscope 123:1156–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morris LG, Lieberman SM, Reitzen SD et al (2008) Characteristics and outcomes of malpractice claims after tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138:315–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lynn-Macrae AG, Lynn-Macrae RA, Emani J et al (2004) Medicolegal analysis of injury during endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 114:1492–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lydiatt DD (2004) Medical malpractice and head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Otolarygol Head Neck Surg 12:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lydiatt DD (2003) Litigation and the lingual nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lydiatt DD (2003) Medical malpractice and the thyroid gland. Head Neck 25:429–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lydiatt DD (2003) Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:50–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lydiatt DD (2002) Medical malpractice and cancer of the larynx. Laryngoscope 112:445–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guldfred LA, Lyhne D, Becker BC (2008) Acute epiglottitis: epidemiology, clinical presentation, management and outcome. J Laryngol Otol 122:818–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hermansen MN, Schmidt JH, Krug AH et al (2014) Low incidence of children with acute epiglottis after introduction of vaccination. Dan Med J 61:A4788

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katori H, Tsukuda M (2005) Acute epiglottitis: analysis of factors associated with airway intervention. J Laryngol Otol 119:967–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeuchi M, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H et al (2013) The burden of epiglottitis among Japanese children before the Hemophilus influenzae type b vaccination era: an analysis using nationwide administrative database. J Infect Chemother 19:876–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Isakson M, Hugosson S (2011) Acute epiglottitis: epidemiology and Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype distribution in adults. J Laryngol Otol 125:390–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Berger G, Landau T, Berger S et al (2003) The rising incidence of adult acute epiglottitis and epiglottic abscess. Am J Otolaryngol 24:374–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiyama T, Yoshihara M, Tanaka S et al (2012) Change in malpractice claims in Japanese gastroenterological practice. Am J Gastroenterol 107:143–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP et al (1997) Physician–patient communication—the relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA 277:553–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakajima K, Keyes C, Kuroyanagi T et al (2001) Medical malpractice and legal resolution systems in Japan. JAMA 285:1632–1640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to acknowledge Professor Emi Hiyama, Hiroshima University Law School, for assistance in obtaining case information and the legal database research.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Health Service Center, Hiroshima University, 1-7-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima, 739-8514, Japan

    Toru Hiyama

Authors
  1. Toru Hiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toru Hiyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hiyama, T. Otorhinolaryngology litigations in Japan. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 2947–2951 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05561-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05561-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation