Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term results using LigaSure™ 5 mm instrument for treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term results and patient’s satisfaction of a new approach using the LigaSure™ 5 mm instrument for treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD) and to compare with other long-term results using traditional treatment modalities. Between December 2011 and August 2013, a total of 23 patients with ZD underwent endoscopic surgery using the LigaSure™ technique in our department. A retrospective evaluation of the surgery was based on medical records and additionally a long-term follow-up was performed using a standardized questionnaire that was send to all patients. The questions dealt with complaints according to a visual analog scale (VAS) and were sent a minimum of one year after the surgery (mean time 22 months, range 12–32 month). The overall response rate was 91%. The mean age of the patients was 69 years (range 37–89 years). The patients reported nine for overall satisfaction on the VAS (range 0–10: 10 being very content and 0 very uncontent, 25 and 75% quartiles: 7 and 10) regarding the final outcome of their surgery, although several of the patients had continuous symptoms within the first postoperative year. Eight patients (38%) reported no symptoms at all. Our results suggest that endoscopic management of ZD with the LigaSure™ 5 mm instrument is a minimally invasive, fast and safe method with solid long-term outcome with relief of symptoms and patient satisfaction. This new operative instrument was not found inferior to traditional endoscopic techniques and is now the standard treatment method for ZD in our departments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ludlow A (1796) A case of obstructed deglutition from a preternatural dilatation of, and bag formed in, the pharynx. Med Observ Inq 3:85–101

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zenker FA, Von Ziemssen H (1878) Dilatations of the esophagus. Cyclop Pract Med 3:46–48

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van Overbeek JJ (2003) Pathogenesis and methods of treatment of Zenker´s diverticulum. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 112:583–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wheeler WI (1886) Pharyngocele and dilatation of the pharynx, with existing diverticulum at lower portion of the pharynx lying posterior to the oesophagus, cured by pharyngotomy, being the first case of the kind recorded. Dublin J Med Sci 82:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aiolfi A, Scolari F, Saino G, Bonavina L (2015) Current status of minimally invasive endoscopic management for Zenker diverticulum. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7:87–93

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Verdonck J, Morton RP (2015) Systematic review on treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:3095–3107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith SR, Genden EM, Urken ML (2002) Endoscopic stapling technique for the treatment of Zenker diverticulum vs standard open-neck technique: a direct comparison and charge analysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:141–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parker NP, Misono S (2014) Carbon dioxide laser versus stapler-assisted endoscopic Zenker’s diverticulotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150:750–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollei TR, Hinni ML, Hayden RE, Lott DG, Mors MB (2013) Comparison of carbon dioxide laser-assisted versus stapler-assisted endoscopie crieopharyngeal myotomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 122:568–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adam SI, Paskhover B, Sasaki CT (2013) Revision Zenker diverticulum: laser versus stapler outcomes following initial endoscopic failure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 122:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen HU, Trolle W, Rubek N, Homøe P (2014) New technique using ligasure for endoscopic mucomyotomy of Zenker’s diverticulum: diverticulotomy made easier. Laryngoscope 124:2039–2042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Noguera-Aguilar J, Dolz-Abadía C, Vilella A, Muñoz-Pérez JM, Canaval-Zuleta HJ, Salvatierra-Arrieta L (2014) Transoral endoluminal approach to Zenker’s diverticulum using ligasure. Early clinical experience. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 106:137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Velser T, Homøe P (2005) Resultatet af ti års behandling med endoskopisk laserevaporation af Zenkers divertikel—en patienttilfredshedsundersøgelse. Ugeskr Laeger 167:1746–1749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Anagiotos A, Feyka M, Eslick GD, Lichtenstein T, Henning TD, Guntinas-Lichius O, Hüttenbrink KB, Preuss SF (2014) Long-term symptom control after endoscopic laser-assisted diverticulotomy of Zenker’s diverticulum. Auris Nasus Larynx 41:568–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang CY, Payyapilli RJ, Scher RL (2003) Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for Zenker’s diverticulum: review of experience in 159 consecutive cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 113:957–965

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nyrop M, Svendstrup F, Jørgensen KE (2000) Endoscopic CO2 laser therapy of Zenker’s diverticulum—experience from 61 patients. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 543:232–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Murer K, Soyka MB, Broglie MA, Huber GF, Stoeckli SJ (2015) Zenker’s diverticulum: outcome of endoscopic surgery is dependent on the intraoperative exposure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:167–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lippert BM, Folz BJ, Gottschlich S, Werner JA (1997) Microendoscopic treatment of the hypopharyngeal diverticulum with the CO2 laser. Lasers Surg Med 20:394–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zbären P, Schar P, Tschopp L, Becker M, Häusler R (1999) Surgical treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: transcutaneous diverticulectomy versus microendoscopic myotomy of the cricopharyngeal muscle with CO2 laser. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:482–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jepsen O, Thomsen KA, Bretlau P, Pedersen CB, Ovesen T (2006) Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 11th edn. Munksgaard

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Preben Homøe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and the study has been carried out without any funding.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andersen, M.F., Trolle, W., Anthonsen, K. et al. Long-term results using LigaSure™ 5 mm instrument for treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 1939–1944 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4489-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4489-8

Keywords

Navigation