References
Hay A, Blanshard J (2014) Anterior inlay myringoplasty: outcome and hearing results in anterior and subtotal tympanic membrane perforations. Otol Neurotol 35:1569–1576
Kumar S, Acharya A, Hadjihannas E, Panagamuwa C, McDermott AL (2010) Pediatric myringoplasty: definition of success and factors affecting outcome. Otol Neurotol 31:417–420
Lee JC, Lee SR, Nam JK, Lee TH, Kwon JK (2012) Comparison of different grafting techniques in type 1 tympanoplasty in cases of significant middle ear granulation. Otol Neurotol 33:586–590
Pignataro L, Grillo Della Berta L, Capaccio P, Zaghis A (2001) Myringoplasty in children: anatomical and functional results. J Laryngol Otol 115:369–373
Lee P, Kelly G, Mills RP (2002) Myringoplasty: does the size of perforation matter? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27:331–334
Singh GB, Sidhu TS, Sharma A, Singh N (2005) Tympanoplasty type I in children: an evaluative study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 69:1071–1076
Carr MM, Poje CP, Nagy ML, Pizzuto MP, Brodsky LS (2001) Success rates in peadiatric tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol 30:199–202
Yilmaz MS, Kara A, Guven M, Demir D, Erkorkmaz U (2016) Assessment of the factors that affect the anatomic and functional success of cartilage tympanoplasty in children. J Craniofac Surg. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000003162
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This reply refers to the comment available at
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yilmaz, M.S. Response to the letter to the editor regarding “Comparison of the anatomic and hearing outcomes of cartilage type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric and adult patients”. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 2673–2674 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4462-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4462-6