Skip to main content
Log in

Does Shamblin’s classification predict postoperative morbidity in carotid body tumors? A proposal to modify Shamblin’s classification

  • Miscellaneous
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 14 September 2006

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the possible correlation between Shamblin’s classification and post-surgical morbidity in the treatment of carotid body tumors (CBTs). Seventy-two patients with carotid body tumors were seen over a 22-year period. Twenty-three patients were excluded as they did not comply with the criteria of the objectives. All patients were grouped according to Shamblin’s classification. We propose a modification to this classification and make a comparison by analyzing the surgical time and bleeding, as well as the neurological and vascular damage. We resected 50 CBTs in 49 patients, ranging in age from 18 to 73 years. Three groups were formed: group I with 8 (16%) patients, group II with 17 (34%) and group III with 24 (49%). Post-surgical neurological damage was observed in one patient (12.5%) from group I, in six (35%) from group II and in nine patients (37.5%) from group III. Vascular sacrifice had to be performed in 21% of class II tumors and in 8.7% of class III. None of the class I tumors required vascular sacrifice. No statistically significant difference existed for vascular or neurological risk in relation to Shamblin’s classification. However, when analyzed according to the classification proposed herein, there was a correlation between Shamblin’s classification and vascular sacrifice ( P =0.001). There was a statistically significant correlation between the original Shamblin and the modified Shamblin regarding surgical time and bleeding. Shamblin’s classification predicts only vascular morbidity. Neurological morbidity is not reflected in it and only reflects the surgeon’s experience with CBT resections. Surgical time and bleeding are directly related to the Shamblin as it reflects the size of tumors in relation to the blood vessels. Shamblin’s classification must be modified to be more objective so that the international reports can accurately reflect the morbidity related to it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carrau R, Myers E, Johnson J (1990) Management of tumors arising in the parapharyngeal space. Laryngoscope 100:583–589

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidge-Pitts KJ, Pantanowitz D (1984) Carotid body tumor. Surg Ann 16:203–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon-Taylor G (1982) On carotid body tumors. BMJ 284:1507–1508

    Google Scholar 

  4. Granados-Garcia M, Rascon-Ortiz M, Herrera-Gomez A, Luna-Ortiz K (2004) Reconstrucción de arteria carótida interna con trasposición de arteria carótida externa en resección de tumores del cuerpo carotídeo. Cir Cir 72:457–459

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lees CD, Levine H, Beven E, Tucker H (1981) Tumors of the carotid body. Am J Surg 142:362–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leonetti J, Donzelli J, Littooy F, Farrel B (1997) Perioperative strategies in the management of carotid body tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:111–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luna-Ortiz K, Rascon-Ortiz M, Villavicencio-Valencia V, Granados-Garcia M, Herrera-Gomez A (2005) Carotid body tumors: review of a 20-year experience. Oral Oncol 41:56–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patetsios P, Gable D, Garret W, Lamont J, Kuhn J, Shutze W, Kourlis H, Grimsley B, Pearl Gj, Smith BL, Talkington CM, Thompson JE (2002) Management of carotid body paragangliomas and review of a 30-year experience. Ann Vasc Surg 16:331–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Plukker JTM, Brongers EP, Vermey A, Krikke A, van den Dungen JJAM (2001) Outcome of surgical treatment for carotid body paraganglioma. Br J Surg 88:1382–1386

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen I, Palmer J, Goldberg M, Mustard R (1981) Vascular problems associated with carotid body tumors. Am J Surg 142:459–463

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shamblin WR, Remine WH, Sheps SG, Harrison EG (1971) Carotid body tumor (chemodectoma). Clinicophatologic analysis of 90 cases. Am J Surg 122:732–739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Westerband A, Hunter GC, Cintora I, Coulthard SW, Hinni ML, Gentile AT, Devine J, Mills JL (1998) Current trends in the detection and management of carotid body tumors. J Vasc Surg 28:84–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuauhyama Luna-Ortiz.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0121-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luna-Ortiz, K., Rascon-Ortiz, M., Villavicencio-Valencia, V. et al. Does Shamblin’s classification predict postoperative morbidity in carotid body tumors? A proposal to modify Shamblin’s classification. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263, 171–175 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-005-0968-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-005-0968-4

Keywords

Navigation