Abstract
Purpose
Patients after radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) need specific follow-up treatment because their problems differ from those of other gyneco-oncologic patients. Anatomic changes after surgery complicate examinations. Recognition and treatment of these issues require physician’s expertise.
Patients and methods
We evaluated the follow-up data of 70 patients who underwent RVT for early cervical cancer between 03/2010 and 12/2013. The follow-up interval in the first 2 years was 3 and 6 months in the following 2 years. We used a tailored protocol to describe the special problems after RVT.
Results
Cervical stenosis was one of the central problems independent of time interval to RVT. Physicians’ most significant problem was to locate the exact position of the neo-cervix and thus to receive valid pap smears.
Conclusions
Follow-up of patients after RVT needs special expertise because the symptoms differ from those after hysterectomy and examinations ensuring oncologic safety require special attention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Matsuo K, Machida H, Shoupe D, Melamed A, Muderspach LI, Roman LD, Wright JD (2017) Ovarian conservation and overall survival in young women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 129:139–151
Covens A, Rosen B, Murphy J, Laframboise S, DePetrillo AD, Lickrish G, Colgan T, Chapman W, Shaw P (2001) Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA (2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years. Gynecol Oncol. 81:133–137
Hertel H, Köhler C, Grund D, Hillemanns P, Possover M, Michels W, Schneider A, German Association of Gynecologic Oncologists (AGO) (2006) Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) combined with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy: prospective multicenter study of 100 patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 103:506–511
Dargent D, Brun JL, Roy M, Mathevet P, Remy I (1994) La trachélectomie élargie (T.E.) une alternative à l’hystérectomie radicale dans le traitement des cancers infiltrants développés sur la face externe du col utérin. Jobgyn 2:285–292
Dargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A, Mathevet P (2000) Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer 88:1877–1882
Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT, Heintz AP, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S (2006) Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95(Suppl 1):43–103
Lanowska M, Mangler M, Spek A, Grittner U, Hasenbein K, Chiantera V, Hertel H, Schneider A, Köhler C, Speiser D (2011) Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) combined with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: prospective study of 225 patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:1458–1464
Mangler M, Lanowska M, Köhler C, Vercellino F, Schneider A, Speiser D (2014) Patterns of cancer recurrence in 320 patients after radical vaginal trachelectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24:130–134
Speiser D, Mangler M, Köhler C, Hasenbein K, Hertel H, Chiantera V, Gottschalk E, Lanowska M (2011) Fertility outcome after radical vaginal trachelectomy: a prospective study of 212 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:1635–1639
Speiser D, Köhler C, Schneider A, Mangler M (2013) Radical vaginal trachelectomy: a fertility-preserving procedure in early cervical cancer in young women. Dtsch Arztebl Int 110:289–295
Lanowska M, Mangler M, Grittner U, Akbar GR, Speiser D, von Tucher E, Köhler C, Schneider A, Kühn W (2014) Isthmic-vaginal smear cytology in the follow-up after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer: is it safe? Cancer Cytopathol 122(5):349–358
Covens A, Shaw P, Murphy J, DePetrillo D, Lickrish G, Laframboise S, Rosen B (1999) Is radical trachelectomy a safe alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with stage IA-B carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer 86:2273–2279
Ghorab Z, Ismiil N, Covens A, Nofech-Mozes S, Saad RS, Dubé V, Khalifa MA (2009) Postradical vaginal trachelectomy follow-up by isthmic-vaginal smear cytology: a 13-year audit. Diagn Cytopathol 37:641–646
Foeldi E, Dimakakos EP (2012) Interdisciplinary lymphology: the best place for each discipline in a team. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 11(1):28–30
Carter J, Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Raviv L, Abu-Rustum NR (2008) Radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer: postoperative physical and emotional adjustment concerns. Gynecol Oncol 111:151–157
Carter J, Raviv L, Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Abu-Rustum NR (2011) Recovery issues of fertility-preserving surgery in patients with early-stage cervical cancer and a model for survivorship: the physician checklist. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21(1):106–116
Frøding LP, Ottosen C, Mosgaard BJ, Jensen PT (2015) Quality of life, urogynecological morbidity, and lymphedema after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:699–706
Brown AJ, Shah JS, Fleming ND, Nick AM, Soliman PT, Chisholm GB, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M (2016) Role of cervical cytology in surveillance after radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 142:283–285
Li X, Li J, Wu X (2015) Incidence, risk factors and treatment of cervical stenosis after radical trachelectomy: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 51:1751–1759
Grund D, Köhler C, Krauel H, Schneider A (2007) A new approach to preserve fertility by using a coated nitinol stent in a patient with recurrent cervical stenosis. Fertil Steril 87:1212
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DS: Project development, Data collection, Data management, Data analysis, Supervision and Manuscript writing and editing. SM: Data management, Data analysis. ML: Support in project conception, Data collection and Manuscript editing. AB: Data collection and Manuscript editing. JUB: Supporting project development and Manuscript editing. MM: Supporting project development, Data collection, Data analysis and Manuscript editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No specific funding was obtained.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Speiser, D., Malik, S., Lanowska, M. et al. Follow-up after radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT): patients’ problems and physicians’ difficulties. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296, 559–564 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4463-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4463-0