Abstract
Purpose
The treatment of Bartholin’s gland cysts by traditional surgery is characterized by some disadvantages and complications such as hemorrhage, postoperative dyspareunia, infections, necessity for a general anesthesia. Contrarily, CO2 laser surgery might be less invasive and more effective as it solves many problems of traditional surgery. The aim of our study is to describe CO2 laser technique evaluating its feasibility, complication rate and results vs traditional surgery.
Methods
Among patients treated for Bartholin’s gland cyst, we enrolled 62 patients comparing traditional surgical excision vs CO2 laser surgery of whom 27 patients underwent traditional surgery, whereas 35 patients underwent CO2 laser surgery. Mean operative time, complication rate, recurrence rate and short- and long-term outcomes were assessed.
Results
The procedures required a mean operative time of 9 ± 5.3 min for CO2 laser surgery and 42.2 ± 13.8 for traditional surgery. Two patients (5.7 %) needed an hemostatic suture for intraoperative bleeding in the laser CO2 laser technique against 14.8 % for traditional surgery. Carbon dioxide allows a complete healing in a mean time of 22 days without scarring, hematomas or wound infections and a return to daily living in a mean time of 2 days. Instead, patients undergone traditional surgery required a mean time of 14 days to return to daily life with a healing mean time completed in 28 days.
Conclusions
The minimum rate of intra- and post-operative complications, the ability to perform it under local anesthesia in an outpatient setting make CO2 laser surgery more cost-effective than traditional surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Marzano DA, Haefner HK (2004) The Bartholin gland cyst: past, present and future. J Low Genit Tract Dis 8:195–204
Omole F, Simmons BJ, Hacker Y (2003) Management of Bartholin’s duct cyst and gland abscess. Am Fam Physician 68(1):135–140
Kaufman RH (1994) Benign diseases of the vulva and vagina, 4th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 168–248
Wren MW (1977) Bacteriological findings in cultures of clinical material from Bartholin’s abscess. J Clin Pathol 30(11):1025–1027
Lee YH, Rankin JS, Alpert S, Daly AK, McCormack WM (1977) Microbiological investigation of Bartholin’s gland abscesses and cysts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 129(2):150–153
Kessous R, Aricha-Tamir B, Sheizaf B, Steiner N, Moran-Gilad J, Weintraub AY (2013) Clinical and microbiological characteristics of Bartholin gland abscesses. Obstet Gynecol 122(4):794–799
Wilkinson EJ, Stone IK (1995) Atlas of vulvar disease, 5th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Blaustein A (1977) Pathology of the female genital tract. Springer, New York, pp 26–28
Pundir J, Auld BJ (2008) A review of the management of diseases of the Bartholin’s gland. J Obstet Gyneacol 28(2):161–165
Folashade O, Barbara J, Simmons Yolanda H (2003) Management of Bartholin’s duct cysts and gland abscess. Am Fam Physician 68:135–140
Hill A, Lense OJ (1998) Office management of bartholin gland cysts and abscesses. Am Fam Physician 57(7):1611–1616
Patil S, Sultan AH, Thakar R (2007) Bartholin’s cysts and abscesses. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 27(3):241–245
Haider Z, Condous G, Kirik E, Mukri F, Bourne T (2007) The simple outpatient management of Bartholin’s abscess using the Word catheter: a preliminary study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 47(2):137–140
Horowitz IR, Buscema J, Woodruff JD (1997) Surgical conditions of the vulva. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD (eds) Te Linde’s operative gynecology, 8th edn. Lipincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 890–893
Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O’Connor D, Prey M, Raab S, Sherman M, Wilbur D, Wright T Jr, Young N, Forum Group Members, Bethesda 2001 Workshop (2002) The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 287(16):2114–2119
Tatti S, Bornstein J, Prendiville W (2013) Colposcopy: a global perspective: introduction of the new IFCPC colposcopy terminology. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 40(2):235–250
BenedettiPanici P, Manci N, Bellati F, Di Donato V, Marchetti C, Calcagno M, Morano G, Servodio C, Muzii L, Angioli R (2007) CO2 laser therapy of the Bartholin’s gland cyst: surgical data and functional short- and long-term results. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(3):348–351
Di Donato V, Bellati F, Casorelli A, Giorgini M, Perniola G, MarchettiC Palaia I, Benedetti Panici P (2013) CO2 laser treatment for Bartholin gland abscess: ultrasound evaluation of risk recurrence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 20(3):346–352
Fambrini M, Penna C, Pieralli A, Fallani MG, Andersson KL, Lozza V, Scarselli G, Marchionni M (2008) Carbon-dioxide laser vaporization of the Bartholin gland cyst: a retrospective analysis on 200 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(3):327–331
Mungan T, UğurM Yalçin H, Alan S, Sayilgan A (1995) Treatment of Bartholin’s cyst and abscess: excision versus silver nitrate insertion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 63(1):61–63
Kafali H, Yurtseven S, Ozardali I (2004) Aspiration and alcohol sclerotherapy: a novel method for management of Bartholin’s cyst or abscess. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112(1):98–101
Lashgari M, Keene M (1986) Excision of Bartholin duct cysts using the CO2 laser. Obstet Gynecol 67(5):735–737
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frega, A., Schimberni, M., Ralli, E. et al. Complication and recurrence rate in laser CO2 versus traditional surgery in the treatment of Bartholin’s gland cyst. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294, 303–309 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4045-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4045-6