Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of bowel function in the peripartum period

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Obstetric patients frequently experience changes in bowel function, throughout pregnancy and into the postpartum period. Little is known regarding the timing and consistency of bowel movements immediately postpartum. The primary aim of this study was to characterize the timing and consistency of the first bowel movement after obstetric delivery in a racially diverse population at an academic medical center.

Methods

Patients were approached on the day of delivery. Patients received a data collection survey to record the date and consistency of their first bowel movement. Consistency was assessed using the Bristol Stool Form Scale.

Results

One hundred and sixty-nine patients were enrolled and 101 completed surveys were returned, for a response rate of 59 %. The average number of days to first bowel movement was 1.55 versus 3.38 (p < 0.01), for vaginal delivery and cesarean section, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed cesarean delivery (+1.79 days, p < 0.01) and breastfeeding (−0.64 days, p = 0.01) as independent factors affecting the timing of the first bowel movement.

Conclusions

Both route of delivery and breastfeeding status may affect timing and consistency of the first bowel movement after obstetric delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jewell D, Young G (2001) Interventions for treating constipation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):Article No CD001142. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001142

  2. Anderson AS (1984) Constipation during pregnancy: incidence and methods used in its treatment in a group of Cambridgeshire women. Health Visit 57:363–364

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson AS, Lean ME (1986) Dietary intake in pregnancy. A comparison between 49 Cambridgeshire women and current recommended intake. Hum Nutr Appl Nutr 40A:40–48

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greenhalf JO, Leonard HSD (1973) Laxatives in the treatment of constipation in pregnant and breast-feeding mothers. Practitioner 210:259–263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall K, Thompson KA, Walsh DM, Baxter GD (1998) Incidence of urinary incontinence and constipation during pregnancy and postpartum: survey of current findings at the Rotunda Lying-in Hospital. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:400–402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Derbyshire EJ, Davies J, Detmar P (2007) Changes in bowel function: pregnancy and the puerperium. Dig Dis Sci 52:324–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van de Pol G, Heintz AP, van der Haart CH (2006) Defecatory symptoms during and after the first pregnancy: prevalences and associated factors. Int Urogynecol J 17:224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradley CS, Kennedy CM, Turcea AM, Rao SSC, Nygaard IE (2007) Constipation in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 110:1351–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun SX, Dibonaventure M, Purayidathil FW, Wagner JS, Dabbous O, Mody R (2011) Impact of chronic constipation on health-related quality of life, work productivity and healthcare resource use: an analysis of the National Health and Wellness Survey. Dig Dis Sci 56(9):2688–2695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wald A, Sigurdsson L (2011) Quality of life in children and adults with constipation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 25(1):19–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scott LD, Lester R, Van Thiel DH, Wald A (1983) Pregnancy related changes in small intestinal myoelectrical activity in the rat. Gastroenterology 84:301–305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan JP, Bhojwani A (1986) Colonic transit in rats: effect of ovariectomy, sex steroid hormones, and pregnancy. Am J Physiol 251:G46–G50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wald A, VanThiel DH, Hoechstetter L et al (1981) Gastrointestinal transit: the effect of the menstrual cycle. Gastroenterology 80:1497–1506

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wald A, VanThiel DH, Hoechstetter L et al (1982) Effect of pregnancy on the gastrointestinal transit. Dig Dis Sci 27:1015–1018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Soriano D, Dulitzki M, Kridar N, Barkai G, Mashiach S, Seidman DS (1996) Early oral feeding after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 87:1006–1008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patolia D, Hilljard R, Tby E, Baker B (2001) Early feeding after cesarean: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 98:113–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Adupa D, Wandabwa J, Kiondo P (2003) A randomized controlled trial of early initiation of oral feeding after cesarean delivery in Mulago Hospital. East Afr Med J 80:345–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kafali H, Duvan C, Gozdemir E, Simavli S, Onaran Y, Keskin E (2010) Influence of gum chewing on postoperative bowel activity after cesarean section. Gynecol Obstet Invest 69:84–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohlsson B (2007) Bowel habits in women during pregnancy, breast feeding and after breast feeding. J Clin Gastroenterol 41:224–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW (1997) Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 32:920–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson A, Whichelow M (1985) Constipation during pregnancy: dietary fibre intake and the effect of fibre supplementation. Hum Nutr Appl Nutr 39A:202–207

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tarr M, Klenov V, Tanzy M, Rivard C et al (2012) Perioperative bowel habits of women undergoing gynecologic surgery: a pilot study. Female Pelvic Reconstr Surg 18:153–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA

    Scott Graziano, Darby Murphy, Lena Braginsky, Joanna Horwitz, Vanessa Kennedy, Danielle Burkett & Kimberly Kenton

Authors
  1. Scott Graziano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Darby Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lena Braginsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joanna Horwitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vanessa Kennedy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Danielle Burkett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kimberly Kenton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Graziano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graziano, S., Murphy, D., Braginsky, L. et al. Assessment of bowel function in the peripartum period. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289, 23–27 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2914-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2914-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation