Skip to main content
Log in

Prophylactic adnexectomy along with vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of prophylactic adnexectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy (VH) between 2008 and 2010. Clinical comparison of patients who underwent VH with adnexectomy (n = 92) and VH only (n = 686) was performed. Clinical characteristics (age, parity, body mass index, and previous pelvic surgery), surgical outcomes (uterine weight, operative time, estimated blood loss, pelvic adhesion, hemoglobin change and hospital stay) and intra- and postoperative complications (transfusion, bladder injury and fever) were evaluated.

Results

Clinical characteristics except for age (45.44 years for VH only vs. 47.15 years for VH with adnexectomy, P = 0.007) were not different between the two groups. Similarly, surgical outcomes and complication rates were not different between the two groups.

Conclusion

Prophylactic bilateral adnexectomy can be performed safely during VH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. NIH Consensus Conference (1995) Ovarian cancer. Screening, treatment, and follow-up. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Ovarian Cancer. JAMA 273:491–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL et al (2002) Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 346:1616–1622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME et al (2002) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 346:1609–1615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Howard BV, Kuller L, Langer R et al (2005) Risk of cardiovascular disease by hysterectomy status, with and without oophorectomy: the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Circulation 111:1462–1470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Howe HL (1984) Age-specific hysterectomy and oophorectomy prevalence rates and the risks for cancer of the reproductive system. Am J Public Health 74:560–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacoby VL, Vittinghoff E, Nakagawa S et al (2009) Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions. Obstet Gynecol 113:1259–1267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shepherd JP, Zyczynski HM Removal of adnexa at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53:17–25

  9. Lepine LA, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA et al (1997) Hysterectomy surveillance—United States, 1980–1993. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 46:1–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber AM, Lee JC (1996) Use of alternative techniques of hysterectomy in Ohio, 1988–1994. N Engl J Med 335:483–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, Strauss LT, Xia Z, Peterson HB (1994) Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988–1990. Obstet Gynecol 83:549–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davies A, O’Connor H, Magos AL (1996) A prospective study to evaluate oophorectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:915–920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kovac SR, Cruikshank SH (1996) Guidelines to determine the route of oophorectomy with hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1483–1488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kovac SR, Barhan S, Lister M, Tucker L, Bishop M, Das A (2002) Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1521–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gendy R, Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Karantanis E Vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:388e1–388e8

  16. Camanni M, Mistrangelo E, Febo G, Ferrero B, Deltetto F (2009) Prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280:87–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sheth SS (2002) Adnexectomy for benign pathology at vaginal hysterectomy without laparoscopic assistance. BJOG 109:1401–1405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vakili B, Chesson RR, Kyle BL et al (2005) The incidence of urinary tract injury during hysterectomy: a prospective analysis based on universal cystoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1599–1604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ibeanu OA, Chesson RR, Echols KT, Nieves M, Busangu F, Nolan TE (2009) Urinary tract injury during hysterectomy based on universal cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 113:6–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Muller CY, Coleman RL, Toler K, Gibbons D, Ashfaq R, Voet RL (2002) Adequacy of oophorectomy at the time of gynecologic surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 77:23–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-ho Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, Hy., Kang, Sw., Kim, Hb. et al. Prophylactic adnexectomy along with vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286, 1221–1225 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2451-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2451-y

Keywords

Navigation