Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A novel approach to postoperative bladder care in women after radical hysterectomy

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Currently, controversy exists with regard to the duration of bladder drainage and choice of catheter used in women who undergo radical hysterectomy. In this manuscript, we propose a novel approach to improving postoperative bladder care in women who undergo radical hysterectomy.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of women who underwent Type 3 Piver radical hysterectomy in a gynaecological oncology centre in the United Kingdom from January 2009 to September 2011. We report the outcomes of removal of urinary catheter 48–72 h following radical hysterectomy.

Results

Over a 32-month period, 30 women underwent radical hysterectomy. 19 (63.3 %) women underwent surgery for treatment of cervical cancer, 5 (16.7 %) women for management of endometrial cancer, 6 (20 %) women for other conditions. One patient underwent partial cystectomy at the time of radical hysterectomy and was not included in the analysis. Of the 29 patients, only five (17.2 %) were found to have urinary residuals greater than 100 ml following the removal of the indwelling catheter on the second postoperative day and required recatheterisation. 82.8 % of the patients had the catheter removed within 48–72 h postoperatively. None of these patients required re-admission with urinary retention.

Conclusion

Removal of urinary catheter on the second postoperative day following radical hysterectomy is feasible and not associated with increased morbidity. This approach may be particularly useful to complement the introduction of laparoscopic and robotic surgical approaches for surgical management of cervical cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP (1974) Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 44:265–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R et al (2003) Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 48:287–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Naik R, Nwabinelli J, Mayne C et al (2001) Prevalence and management of (non-fistulous) urinary incontinence in women following radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 22:26–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Benedetti-Panici P, Zullo MA, Plotti F et al (2004) Long-term bladder function in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type 3–4 radical hysterectomy. Cancer 100:2110–2117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Farquharson DI, Shingleton HM, Orr JW Jr et al (1987) The short-term effect of radical hysterectomy on urethral and bladder function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:351–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kadar N, Saliba N, Nelson JH (1983) The frequency, causes and prevention of severe urinary dysfunction after radical hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90:858–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chamberlain DH, Hopkins MP, Roberts JA et al (1991) The effects of early removal of indwelling urinary catheter after radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 43:98–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seski JC, Diokno AC (1977) Bladder dysfunction after radical abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 128(6):643–651

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scotti RJ, Bergman A, Bhatia NN et al (1986) Urodynamic changes in urethrovesical function after radical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 68:111–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Magrina JF, Pawlina W, Kho RM et al (2011) Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique. Gynecol Oncol 121:605–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Estape R, Lambrou N, Diaz R et al (2009) A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 113:357–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Querleu D, Morrow PC (2008) Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol 9:297–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wells TH, Steed H, Capstick V et al (2008) Suprapubic or urethral catheter: what is the optimal method of bladder drainage after radical hysterectomy? J Obstet Gynaecol Can 30:1034–1038

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cibula D, Slama J, Velechovska P et al (2010) Factors affecting spontaneous voiding recovery after radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:685–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mabrouk M, Frumovitz M, Greer M et al (2009) Trends in laparoscopic and robotic surgery among gynecologic oncologists: a survey update. Gynecol Oncol 112:501–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soliman PT, Frumovitz M, Sun CC et al (2011) Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 123:333–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Naik R, Jackson KS, Lopes A, Cross P, Henry JA (2010) Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy—a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements. BJOG 117(6):746–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilary Turnbull.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turnbull, H., Burbos, N., Abu-Freij, M. et al. A novel approach to postoperative bladder care in women after radical hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286, 1007–1010 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2393-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2393-4

Keywords

Navigation