Skip to main content
Log in

The value of uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of severe complications in a risk population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the role of uterine artery color Doppler waveform analysis in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome such as preeclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation, placental abruption or a combination of outcome parameters in risk pregnancies (n=52).

Methods

Various uterine artery Doppler ultrasound parameters (resistance index (RI)>0.58, RI>0.7 and uni/bilateral or bilateral notching) were tested. The mean time of delivery was 37+1 weeks’ gestation. Six newborns (12%) were delivered before 34 weeks of gestation. The mean birth weight was 2,910 g. Dystrophic fetuses (<10% percentile) were registered in 7 cases (13%). In 11 of the 52 women (21%) a cesarean section was performed because of abnormal fetal heart recording.

Results

Preeclampsia was diagnosed in 4 cases (8%). In 4 cases (8%) an intrauterine fetal death was diagnosed. Placental abruption did not occur. The sensitivity of notching for the prediction of preeclampsia and for the prediction of a severe pregnancy complication was 75 and 69% with relative risks of 2.7 and 2.0. The sensitivity of notching in the uterine arteries for developing an intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) was 71% with a relative risk of 2.2. The sensitivity of RI>0.58 in the uterine arteries for developing an IUGR was 67% with a relative risk of 5.4. The sensitivity of RI>0.58 for the prediction of preeclampsia, of intrauterine death and for the prediction of a severe pregnancy complication was 50, 75 and 80% with relative risks of 2.7, 8.1 and 10.9 respectively.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that Doppler ultrasound of the uterine artery in the second trimester of gestation is a useful method to predict abnormal outcomes in risk pregnancies, with high negative predictive values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aardema MW, De Wolf BTHM, Saro MCS, Oosterhof H, Fidler V, Aarnoudse JG (2000) Quantification of the diastolic notch in Doppler ultrasound screening of uterine arteries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:630–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alfrirevic Z, Neilson JP (1995) Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1379–1387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bewley S, Cooper D, Campbell S (1991) Doppler investigation of uteroplacental blood flow resistance in the second trimester: a screening study for preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynecol 98:871–879

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bower S, Schuchter K, Campbell S (1993) Doppler ultrasound screening as a part of routine antenatal scanning: prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynecol 100:989–994

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bower S, Bewley S, Campbell S (1993) Improved prediction of preeclampsia by two stage screening of uterine arteries using the early diastolic notch and colour Doppler imaging. Obstet Gynecol 82:78–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell S, Griffin DR, Pearce JM, Diaz-Recasens J, Cohen-Overbeek TE, Willson K, Teague M (1983) New Doppler technique for assessing uteroplacental blood flow. Lancet 1:675–677

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caruso A, Caforio L, Testa AC, Ferrazzani S, Mastromarino C, Mancuso S (1996) Chronic hypertension in pregnancy: color Doppler investigation of uterine arteries as a predictive test for superimposed pre-eclampsia and adverse perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med 24:141–153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan FY, Pun TC, Lam C, Khoo J, Lee C, Lam Y (1995) Pregnancy screening by uterine artery Doppler velocimetry—which criterion performs best? Obstet Gynecol 85:596–602

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chien PF, Arnott N, Gordon A et al (2000) How useful is uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal death? An overview. Br J Obstet Gynecol 107:196–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman MAG, McCowan LME, North RA (2000) Mid-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome in high-risk women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15:7–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DeWolf F, DeWolf-Peeters C, Brosens I, Robertson WB (1980) The human placental bed: electron microscopic study of trophoblastic invasion of spiral arteries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137:58–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleischer A, Schulman H, Farmakides G, Bracero L, Grunfeld L, Rochelson B, Koenigsberg M (1986) Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in pregnant women with hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:806–813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanretty KP, Primose MH, Neilson JP, Whittle M (1989) Pregnancy screening by Doppler uteroplacental and umbilical artery waveforms. Br J Obstet Gynecol 96:1163–1167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harrington K, Campbell S, Bewley S, Bower S (1991) Doppler velocimetry studies of the uterine artery in the early prediction of pre-eclampsia and intra-uterine growth retardation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 42 [Suppl]:S14–S20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrington K, Cooper D, Lees C, Hecher K, Campbell S (1996) Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:182–188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Irion O, Massé J, Forest JC, Moutquin JM (1996) Peak systolic over protodiastolic ratio as an objective substitute for the uterine artery notch. Br J Obstet Gynecol 103:993–998

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobson S, Imhof R, Manning N, Mannion V, Little D, Rey E, Redman C (1990) The value of Doppler assessment of the uteroplacental circulation in predicting preeclampsia or intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:110–114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurdi W, Campbell S, Aquilina J, England P, Harrington K (1998) The role of color Doppler imaging of the uterine arteries at 20 weeks’ gestation in stratifying antenatal care. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 12:339–345

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mires GJ, Williams FL, Leslie J, Howie PW (1998) Assessment of uterine arterial notching as a screening test for adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1317–1323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Newnham JP, Patterson LL, James IR, Diepeveen DA, Reid SE (1990) An evaluation of the efficacy of Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis as a screening test in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:403–410

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. North RA, Ferrier C, Long D, Townend K, Smith KP (1994) Uterine artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms in the second trimester for the prediction for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol 83:378–386

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pijneborg R, Dixon G, Robertson WB, Brosens I (1980) Trophoblastic invasion of human decidua from 8 to 18 weeks. Placenta 1:3–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Robertson WB, Brosens I, Dixon HG (1975) Uteroplacental vascular pathology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 5:47–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saftlas AF, Olson DR, Franks AL, Atrash HK, Pokras R (1990) Epidemiology of preeclampsia and eclampsia in the United States, 1979–1986. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:460–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwarze A, Nelles I, Krapp M, Friedrich M, Schmidt W, Diedrich K, Axt-Fliedner R (2004) Evaluation of uterine artery Doppler in the second trimester for the prediction of severe complications in low-risk pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet (in press)

  26. Venkat-Raman N, Backos M, Teoh TG, Lo WTS, Regan L (2001) Uterine artery Doppler in predicting pregnancy outcome in women with antiphospholipid syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 98:235–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Voigt HJ, Becker V (1992) Doppler flow measurements and histomorphology of the placental bed in uteroplacental insufficiency. J Perinat Med 20:139–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zimmermann P, Eiriö V, Koskinen J, Kujansuu E, Ranta T (1997) Doppler assessment of the uterine and uteroplacental circulation in the second trimester in pregnancies at high risk for pre-eclampsia and/or intrauterine growth retardation: comparison and correlation between different Doppler parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9:330–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Axt-Fliedner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Axt-Fliedner, R., Schwarze, A., Nelles, I. et al. The value of uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of severe complications in a risk population. Arch Gynecol Obstet 271, 53–58 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-004-0648-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-004-0648-4

Keywords

Navigation