Abstract
Introduction
Postoperative pain management options are of great importance for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, as joint replacement surgery is reported to be one of the most painful surgical procedures. This study demonstrates pain outcome until 4 weeks postoperatively and evaluates factors influencing pain in the postoperative course after total hip arthroplasty.
Materials and methods
A total of 103 patients were included in this prospective cohort trial and underwent total hip arthroplasty. Postoperative pain was described using a numerical rating scale (NRS); demographic data and perioperative parameters were correlated with postoperative pain.
Results
Evaluation of pain scores in the postoperative course showed a constant decrease in the first postoperative week (mean NRS 3.1 on day 1 to mean NRS 2.3 on day 8) and, then, a perpetual increase for 3 days (mean NRS 2.6 on day 9 to mean NRS 2.3 on day 12). Afterwards, a continuous pain-level decrease was stated (continuous to a mean NRS 0.9 on day 29). No correlation was found between the potential influencing factors sex, age, body mass index, duration of surgery, ASA score, and postoperative pain levels, but a high significant correlation could be stated for preoperative pain levels and postoperative pain intensity (pain while moving p < 0.02 to p < 0.05 depending on the time period “week 1 postoperatively”, “week 2–4”, or “week 1–4”; pain while resting p < 0.001, in all the measured time intervals, respectively).
Conclusion
Increasing pain levels after the first week postoperatively, for 3 days, are most likely to be caused by the change to more extensive mobilization and physiotherapy in the rehabilitation unit. No significant influence or correlation on the intensity of postoperative pain could be found while evaluating potential predictors except preoperative pain levels. Pain management has to take these findings into account in the future to further increase patients’ satisfaction in the postoperative course after total hip arthroplasty and to adapt pain management programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Eaton HE, Katz JN (1997) Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med 102(6):524–530
Gerbershagen HJ, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Aduckathil S, Peelen LM, Kappen TH, van Wijck AJ, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W (2014) Procedure-specific risk factor analysis for the development of severe postoperative pain. Anesthesiology 120(5):1237–1245. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000108
Wylde V, Sayers A, Lenguerrand E, Gooberman-Hill R, Pyke M, Beswick AD, Dieppe P, Blom AW (2015) Preoperative widespread pain sensitization and chronic pain after hip and knee replacement: a cohort analysis. Pain 156(1):47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000002
Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P (2012) What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open 2(1):e000435. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435
Greimel F, Maderbacher G, Zeman F, Grifka J, Meissner W, Benditz A (2017) No clinical difference comparing general, regional, and combination anesthesia in hip arthroplasty: a multicenter cohort-study regarding perioperative pain management and patient satisfaction. J Arthroplast 32(11):3429–3433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.038
Fikentscher T, Grifka J, Benditz A (2015) Perioperative pain therapy in orthopedics. Orthopade 44(9):727–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-015-3152-6
Lenguerrand E, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Sayers A, Brunton L, Beswick AD, Dieppe P, Blom AW (2016) Trajectories of pain and function after primary hip and knee arthroplasty: the ADAPT cohort study. PLoS One 11(2):e0149306. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149306
Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(5):963–974
Bachmeier CJ, March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley HM, Tribe KL, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM, Arthritis C, Outcome Project G (2001) A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthr Cartil 9(2):137–146
Browne JP, Bastaki H, Dawson J (2013) What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme. Health Qual Life Outcomes 11:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-128
Halket A, Stratford PW, Kennedy DM, Woodhouse LJ (2010) Using hierarchical linear modeling to explore predictors of pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty as a consequence of osteoarthritis. J Arthroplast 25(2):254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.007
Fitzgerald JD, Orav EJ, Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Poss R, Goldman L, Mangione CM (2004) Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 51(1):100–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20090
Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Hanna SE, Wessel J, Gollish JD (2006) Modeling early recovery of physical function following hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-100
Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Hanna SE, Gollish JD (2008) Assessing recovery and establishing prognosis following total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 88(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070051
Naylor JM, Harmer AR, Heard RC, Harris IA (2009) Patterns of recovery following knee and hip replacement in an Australian cohort. Aust Health Rev 33(1):124–135
Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Ibrahim S, Hogg-Johnson S, Wong R, Streiner DL, Beaton DE, Cote P, Gignac MA, Flannery J, Schemitsch E, Mahomed NN, Badley EM (2011) The trajectory of recovery and the inter-relationships of symptoms, activity and participation in the first year following total hip and knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 19(12):1413–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.007
Hamilton D, Henderson GR, Gaston P, MacDonald D, Howie C, Simpson AH (2012) Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Postgrad Med J 88(1045):627–631. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130715
Kennedy DM, Hanna SE, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD (2006) Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21(4):559–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.07.010
Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Robarts S, Gollish JD (2011) Using outcome measure results to facilitate clinical decisions the first year after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41(4):232–239. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3516
Judge A, Cooper C, Williams S, Dreinhoefer K, Dieppe P (2010) Patient-reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European Collaborative Cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 62(4):480–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20038
Davis AM, Agnidis Z, Badley E, Kiss A, Waddell JP, Gross AE (2006) Predictors of functional outcome two years following revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(4):685–691. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00150
Schrader P, Boy O, Schleiz W, Dienst R, Reinert C, Sanger V, Schauwecker HH, Siebert W, Scharf HP (2008) Determining the indication for primary total hip and knee replacement. Results of external quality assurance of over 270,000 primary total hip and knee replacements. Orthopade 37(10):1016–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-008-1341-2
Mannion AF, Impellizzeri FM, Naal FD, Leunig M (2015) Women demonstrate more pain and worse function before THA but comparable results 12 months after surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(12):3849–3857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4479-3
Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z (2005) Sex differences in pain perception. Gend Med 2(3):137–145
Oak SR, Strnad GJ, O’Rourke C, Higuera CA, Spindler KP, Brooks PJ (2017) Mid-term results and predictors of patient-reported outcomes of Birmingham hip resurfacing. J Arthroplast 32(1):110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.049
Lungu E, Vendittoli PA, Desmeules F (2015) Identification of patients with suboptimal results after hip arthroplasty: development of a preliminary prediction algorithm. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0720-1
Henderson LA, Gandevia SC, Macefield VG (2008) Gender differences in brain activity evoked by muscle and cutaneous pain: a retrospective study of single-trial fMRI data. Neuroimage 39(4):1867–1876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.045
Hallin RG (2003) Pain more painful in women. Gender perspective neglected in research on the biological mechanisms of pain. Lakartidningen 100(46):3738–3741
Caicedo MS, Solver E, Coleman L, Jacobs JJ, Hallab NJ (2017) Females with unexplained joint pain following total joint arthroplasty exhibit a higher rate and severity of hypersensitivity to implant metals compared with males: implications of sex-based bioreactivity differences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(8):621–628. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00720
Creamer P, Hochberg MC (1997) Osteoarthr Lancet 350(9076):503–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07226-7
Paladini A, Fusco M, Coaccioli S, Skaper SD, Varrassi G (2015) Chronic pain in the elderly: the case for new therapeutic strategies. Pain Physician 18(5):E863–E876
Richmond SA, Fukuchi RK, Ezzat A, Schneider K, Schneider G, Emery CA (2013) Are joint injury, sport activity, physical activity, obesity, or occupational activities predictors for osteoarthritis? A systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 43(8):515–519. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2013.4796
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors made contributions to the interpretation of data and have been involved in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Ethical standards
The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee with the approval number 16-101-0204 (IRB approval). Furthermore, the project was registered in the German Registry of Clinical Studies (DRKS) with the approval number DRKS00011803 (WHO register). The study was applied in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki 1975.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greimel, F., Dittrich, G., Schwarz, T. et al. Course of pain after total hip arthroplasty within a standardized pain management concept: a prospective study examining influence, correlation, and outcome of postoperative pain on 103 consecutive patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138, 1639–1645 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3014-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3014-x