References
Bhandari M, Richards RR, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) The quality of reporting of randomized trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:388–396
Clarke M, Oxman AD (eds) (2003) Cochrane reviewers’ handbook 4.2.0 (updated March 2003). In: The Cochrane Library, issue 2. Update Software, Oxford
Kinz R, Oxman AD (1998) The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomized and non-randomised clinical trials. BMJ 317:1185–1190
Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, Tugwell P, Klassen TP (1998) Does the quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352:609–613
Roberts C, Torgerson D (1998) Randomisation methods in controlled trials. BMJ 317:1301–1310
Schulz KF (1996) Randomized trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines. Lancet 348:596–598
Schulz KF (1995) Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA 274:1456–1458
Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DJ (1995) Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273:408–412
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Disclaimer: This work was funded, in part, by a student research grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research. Dr. Bhandari was funded by a Canada Research Chair in Musculoskeletal Trauma
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, P., Mah, D., Lim, K. et al. Randomization and concealment in surgical trials: a comparison between orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic randomized trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125, 70–72 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0762-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0762-6