Abstract
Background
Ablation of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) is common. Studies indicate that AF recurrence is primarily due to pulmonary vein (PV) re-conduction. This retrospective analysis characterized and evaluated recurrent AF patients using focal impulse and rotor mapping (FIRM) plus PV re-isolation, with follow up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the repeat ablation.
Methods and results
Patients (consecutive, n = 100) underwent FIRM-guided ablation followed by conventional PV re-isolation for recurrent AF treatment. All FIRM patients had failed one or more conventional ablation procedures (1.4 ± 0.08) for paroxysmal (14%), persistent (15%), and long-standing persistent (71%) AF. Stable rotors were identified in 97/100 patients: 60% in the right atrium (RA) and 82% in left atrium (LA) (mean 1.5 ± 0.8 and 2.1 ± 1.2 per patient, respectively). No correlation was noted between the previous number of ablations, AF duration, or LA diameter to the number of rotors (R2 = 0.0039, R2 = 0.0017, and R2 = 0.006, respectively). In this limited observation, only 22% of identified rotors were associated with proximity to low voltage areas. The 12- and 24-month arrhythmia free rate was 93% (13/14) and 92% (12/13) for paroxysmal AF, 60% (9/15) and 47% (7/15) for persistent AF, and 70% (48/69) and 64% (43/67) for long-standing persistent AF, respectively, after a single FIRM procedure and re-isolation of the veins.
Conclusions
The data show a benefit for FIRM-guided ablation in recurrent AF at 12 months. No correlation was found between rotors and tissue characterization, AF duration, or previous number of ablations, suggesting that rotors may play an independent role in maintaining recurrent AF after prior failed ablation.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Rezidive nach vorangegangener Ablation von Vorhofflimmern (VHF) sind häufig. Studien zeigen, dass Vorhofflimmerrezidive in erster Linie auf die erneute Leitungsfähigkeit einer oder mehrerer Pulmonalvenen (PV) zurückzuführen sind. Diese retrospektive Analyse charakterisiert Patienten mit VHF-Rezidiv, die mit fokalem Impuls- und Rotor-Mapping (FIRM) plus PV-Reisolation behandelt wurden. Follow-up-Untersuchungen erfolgten nach 3, 6, 12 und 24 Monaten.
Methoden und Ergebnisse
Insgesamt 100 konsekutive Patienten unterzogen sich einer FIRM-gestützten Ablation, gefolgt von einer konventionellen PV-Reisolation zur Behandlung von rezidivierendem VHF. Alle FIRM-Patienten hatten zuvor eine oder mehrere erfolglose konventionelle Ablationen (1,4 ± 0,08) bei paroxysmalem (14 %), persistierendem (15 %) oder lang persistierendem Vorhofflimmern (71 %) erhalten. Stabile Rotoren wurden bei 97/100 Patienten identifiziert: 60 % im rechten Vorhof (RA) und 82 % im linken Vorhof (LA), durchschnittlich 1,5 ± 0,8 bzw. 2,1 ± 1,2 Rotoren pro Patient. Es wurde keine Korrelation zwischen der vorherigen Anzahl der Ablationen, der Dauer des Vorhofflimmerns oder des LA-Durchmessers und der Anzahl der Rotoren festgestellt (R2 = 0,0039, R2 = 0,0017 bzw. R2 = 0,006). Lediglich 22 % der identifizierten Rotoren befanden sich in der Nähe zu Low-voltage-Arealen. Die Arrhythmiefreiheitsrate nach 12 bzw. 24 Monaten betrug 93 % (13/14) bzw. 92 % (12/13) bei paroxysmalem VHF, 60 % (9/15) bzw. 47 % (7/15) bei persistierendem VHF und 70 % (48/69) bzw. 64 % (43/67) bei lang persistierendem Vorhofflimmern nach einer einzelnen FIRM-gestützten Rotorablation und erneuten PV-Isolation.
Schlussfolgerungen
Unsere Daten zeigen einen Nutzen der FIRM-gestützten Ablation bei rezidivierendem VHF nach 12 Monaten. Es fand sich keine Korrelation zwischen den Rotoren und der Gewebecharakterisierung, der Dauer des VHF oder der vorherigen Anzahl der Ablationen, was darauf hindeutet, dass die Rotoren eine unabhängige Rolle bei der Aufrechterhaltung des rezidivierenden VHF nach einer zuvor fehlgeschlagenen Ablation spielen könnten.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Metayer P, Clemente J (1998) Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. n Engl J Med 339(10):659–666. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199809033391003
Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D (2017) 2017HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 14:528–606. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eus027
Barakat AF, Wazni OM, Saliba WI, Yzeiraj E, Amuthan R, Rehman KA, Tarakji KG, Bassiouny M, Baranowski B, Tchou P, Bhargava M, Dresing T, Callahan T, Cantillon DD, Kanj M, Chung M, Lindsay BD, Hussein AA (2018) Repeat ablation or medical management alone for recurrent arrhythmias after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 29:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13434
Conte G, Chierchia JB, Sieira J, Levinstein M, Casado-Arroyo R, De Asmundis C, Sarkozy A, Rodriguez-Manero M, Di Giovanni G, Baltogiannis G, Wauters K, Brugada P (2013) Repeat procedure using radiofrequency energy for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after initial cryoballoon ablation: a 2-year follow-up. Europace 15:1421–1425. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eut098
Lin D, Santangeli P, Zado ES, Bala R, Hutchinson MD, Riley MP, Franel DS, Garcia F, Dixit S, Callans D, Marchilinski FE (2015) Electrophysiologic findings and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing third or more catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12603
Schreiber D, Rostock T, Frohlich M, Sultan A, Servatius H, Hoffmann BA, Luker J, Berner I, Schaffer B, Wegscheider K, Lezius S, Willems S, Steven D (2015) Five-year follow-up after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using the stepwise approach and prognostic factors for success. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 8:308–317. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001672
Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P, STAR AF II Investigators (2015) Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. n Engl J Med 372:1812–1822. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1408288
Arbelo E, Brugada J, Hindricks G, Maggioni AP, Tavazzi L, Vardas P, Laroche C, Anselme F, Inama G, Jais P, Kalarus Z, Kautzner J, Lewalter T, Mairesse GH, Perez-Villacastin J, Riahi S, Taborsky M, Theodorakis G, Trines SA, Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Pilot Study Investigators (2014) The atrial fibrillation ablation pilot study: A European survey on methodology and results of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation conducted by the Eur Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 35:1466–1478. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu001
Narayan SM, Krummen DE, Shivkumar K, Clopton P, Rappel WJ, Miller JM (2012) Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:628–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.022
Tomassoni G, Duggal S, Muir M, Hutchins L, Turner K, McLoney AM, Hesselson A (2015) Long-term follow-up of FIRM-guided ablation of atrial fibrillation: a single-center experience. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Manag 6:2145–2151
Rashid H, Sweeney A (2015) Approaches for focal impulse and rotor mapping in complex patients: a US private practice experience. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Manag 6:2193–2198
Sommer P, Kircher S, Rolf S, John S, Arya A, Dinov B, Richter S, Bollmann A, Hindricks G (2016) Successful catheter ablation of recurrent longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation with rotor elimination as the procedural endpoint: a case series. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 27:274–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12874
Miller JM, Karla V, Das MK, Jain R, Garlie J, Brewster J, Dandamudi G (2017) Clinical benefit of ablating localized sources for human atrial fibrillation—The Indiana University FIRM registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:1247–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.079
Tilz RR, Lin T, Rillig A, Heeger CH, Scholz A, Wohluth P, Bucur T, Metzner A, Mathew S, Wissner E, Ouyang F, Kuck KH (2017) Focal impulse and rotor modulation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: locations and 1 year outcomes of human rotors identified using a 64-electrode basket catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 28:367–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13157
Kis Z, Theuns DA, Bhagwandien R, Wijchers S, Yap SC, Szili-Torok T (2017) Type and rate of atrial fibrillation termination due to rotational activity ablation combined with pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 28:862–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13240
Brachmann J, Hummel JD, Wilber DJ, Sarver AE, Rapkin J, Shpun S, Szili-Torok T (2019) Prosepctive randomization comparison of rotor ablation vs conventional ablation for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation—The REAFFIRM Trial. LBCT01-01. Presented at: Heart Rhythm Society Annual Scientific Sessions; May 8–11, 2019; San Francisco. https://www.abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/5753/presentation/31210. Accessed 8 Oct 2020
Hummel JD (2016) Atrial mapping with basket catheters—a basket case? JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2:66–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2015.12.006
Mohanty S, Mohanty P, Triveti C, Gianni C, Rocca DDG, Di Biase L, Natale A (2018) Long-term outcome of pulmonary vein isolation with and without focal impulse and rotor modulation mapping insights from a meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 11:e5789. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005789
Peigh G, Wasswrlauf J, Kaplan RM, Amaral AP, Trivedi A, Chicos AB, Arora R, Kim S, Lin A, Verma N, Knight BP, Passman RS (2020) Repeat pulmonary vein isolation with or without FIRM-guided ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation ablation with pulmonary vein reconnection. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 31:1031–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14426
Henley P, Foreman JR, Padanilam BJ, Nair GV, Olson JA, Joshi S, Aziz Z, Foster T, Prystowsky EN (2019) Single-center experience of the FIRM technique to ablate paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 30:493–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13832
Vaquero M, Calvo D, Jalife J (2008) Cardiac fibrillation: from ion channels to rotors in the human heart. Heart Rhythm 5:872–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.02.034
Hansen BJ, Zhao J, Csepe TA, Moore BT, Li N, Jayne LA, Kalyanasundaram A, Lim P, Bratasz A, Powell KA, Simonetti OP, Higgins R, Killic A, Mohler PJ, Janssen P, Weiss R, Hummel JD, Fedorov VV (2015) Atrial fibrillation driven by micro-anatomic intramural re-entry revealed by simultaneous sub-epicardial and sub-endocardial optical mapping in explanted human hearts. Eur Heart J 36:2390–2401. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv233
Spitzer SG, Karoly L, Rammler C, Scharfe F, Weinmann T, Zieschank M, Langbein A (2017) Treatment of recurrent nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation using focal impulse and rotor mapping (FIRM)-guided rotor ablation: early recurrence and long-term outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 28:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.13110
Pappone C, Ciconte G, Vicedomini G, Mangual JO, Li W, Conti M, Giannelli L, Lipartiti F, McSpadden L, Ryu K, Guazzi M, Menicanti L, Santinelli V (2018) Clinical outcome of electrophysiologically guided ablation for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation using a novel real-time 3‑dimensional mapping technique results from a prospective randomized trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 11:e5904. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005904
Salinet J, Schlindwein FS, Stafford P, Almeida TP, Li X, Vanheusden FJ, Guillem MS, Ng GA (2017) Propagation of meandering rotors surrounded by areas of high dominant frequency in persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 14:1269–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.031
Winkle RA, Mead RH, Engel G, Patrawala RA (2011) Long-term results of atrial fibrillation ablation: the importance of all initial ablation failures undergoing a repeat ablation. Am Heart J 162:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.04.013
Fedorov VV, Hansen BJ (2018) A secret marriage between fibrosis and atrial fibrillation drivers. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4(1):30–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2017.09.176
Cochet H, Dubois R, Yamashita S, Al Jefairi N, Berte B, Sellal JM, Hooks D, Frontera A, Amraoui S, Zemoura A, Denis A, Derval N, Sacher F, Corneloup O, Latrabe V, Clement-Guinaudeau S, Relan J, Zahid S, Boyle PM, Trayanova NA, Bernus O, Montaudon M, Laurent F, Hocini M, Haissaguerre M, Jais P (2018) Relationship between fibrosis detected on late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance and re-entrant activity assessed with electrocardiographic imaging in human persistent atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4(1):17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2017.07.019
Zaman JAB, Baykaner T, Clopton P, Swarup V, Kowal RC, Daubert JP, Day JD, Hummel J, Schricker AA, Krummen DE, Mansour M, Tomassoni GF, Wheelan KR, Vishwanathan M, Park S, Wang PJ, Narayan SM, Miller JM (2017) Recurrent post-ablation paroxysmal atrial fibrillation shares substrates with persistent atrial fibrillation an 11-center study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 3:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2016.10.006
Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, Jais P, Akoum N, Marchlinski F, Kholmovski E, Burgon N, Hu N, Mont L, Deneke T, Duyschaever M, Neumann T, Mansour M, Mahnkopf C, Herweg B, Daoud E, Wissner E, Bansmann P, Brachmann J (2014) Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA 311:498–506. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3
Nery PB, Al Dawood W, Nair GM, Redpath CJ, Sadek MM, Chen L, Green MS, Wells G, Birnie DH (2018) Characterization of low voltage areas in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from high-density intracardiac mapping. Can J Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.04.008
Miller JM, Kowal RC, Swarup V, Kaubert JP, Daoud EG, Day JD, Ellenbogen KA, Hummel JD, Baykaner T, Krummen DE, Narayan SM, Reddy V, Shivkumar K, Steinberg JS, Wheelan KR (2014) Initial independent outcomes from focal impulse and rotor modulation ablation for atrial fibrillation: multicenter FIRM registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 25:921–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce
Narayan SM, Krummen DE, Rappel WJ (2012) Clinical mapping approach to diagnose electrical rotors and focal impulse sources for human atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23(5):447–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02332.x
Montserrat S, Sitges M, Calvo N, Silva E, Tamborero D, Vidal B, Berruezo A, Bernado C, Mont L, Brugada J (2011) Effect of repeated radiofrequency catheter ablation on left atrial function for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. am J Cardiol 108:1741–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.07.041
Ammar S, Hessling G, Reents T, Fichtner S, Wu J, Zhu P, Kathan S, Estner LH, Jilek C, Kolb C, Haller B, Deisenhofer I (2011) Arrhythmia type after persistent atrial fibrillation ablation predicts success of the repeat procedure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 4:609–614. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.111.963256
Ammar-Busch S, Kaess BM, Bruhm A, Reents T, Bourier F, Buiatti A, Semmler V, Telishevska M, Kottmaier M, Hessling G, Deisenhofer I (2015) Atrial tachycardias following persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: predictors of recurrence after the repeat ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26:1315–1320. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12817
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Shlomo Shpun, D.Sc., for help with drafting an earlier version of the manuscript and for very helpful comments and support in finalizing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SGS devised the project and the main conceptual ideas. AL worked out the technical details. CR and MZ analyzed the data. SGS, LK, and AL contributed to the interpretation of the results. SGS and AL took the lead in writing the manuscript. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
S.G. Spitzer has received speaker fees and support from Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, Abbott, and Topera, and participated in clinical trials for Abbott and Medtronic. L. Károlyi has received speaker fees from Abbott and participated in clinical trials for Abbott and Medtronic. A. Langbein has received speaker fees and travel support from Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific, and participated in clinical trials for Abbott and Medtronic. C. Rämmler and M. Zieschank declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spitzer, S.G., Károlyi, L., Rämmler, C. et al. Retrospective analysis of FIRM-guided ablation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation: a single-center study. Herzschr Elektrophys 31, 417–425 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-020-00724-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-020-00724-5