Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictive value of inflammatory markers for postoperative recovery following colorectal surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Using biological markers to predict serious complications and global postoperative recovery, to ensure safe and timely patient discharge after elective colorectal surgery represents a major challenge. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that C-reactive protein levels < 172 mg/l on postoperative day 3 were associated with postoperative recovery within 5 days.

Methods

This is a prospective study of a consecutive bicentric cohort. Successive patients scheduled for bowel resection with anastomosis, without stoma, were included. The main composite endpoint for overall postoperative recovery included absence of fever, absence of pain > 2 on the visual analog scale, intestinal gas transit, and patient autonomy for mobility and body care.

Results

One hundred sixty-height patients, with a mean age of 65 years old, were analyzed. Ninety patients (53%) underwent right colectomy and 131 (77%) were operated on by laparoscopy. Severe postoperative complications were observed in 11 patients (6%). One hundred twenty patients (71%) recovered within 5 days. C-reactive protein levels < 172 mg/L on postoperative day 3 had a negative predictive value of 80% to predict recovery within 5 days. Ninety-five percent of patients with C-reactive protein < 172 mg/L at postoperative day 3 had no severe postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Levels of C-reactive protein < 172 mg/L at postoperative day 3 corresponded with an early recovery in 80% of cases, thus allowing safe and early discharge without risk of serious complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Facy O, Paquette B, Orry D, Binquet C, Masson D, Bouvier A et al (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers as early predictors of infection after elective colorectal surgery: results from the IMACORS study. Ann Surg 263(5):961–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh PP, Zeng ISL, Srinivasa S, Lemanu DP, Connolly AB, Hill AG (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of use of serum C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: use of C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. British J Surg 101(4):339–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cousin F, Ortega-Deballon P, Bourredjem A, Doussot A, Giaccaglia V, Fournel I (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for the early diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection after elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 264(2):252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benedix F, Kube R, Meyer F, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2010) Comparison of 17,641 patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer: differences in epidemiology, perioperative course, histology, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 53(1):57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rana AR, Cannon JA, Mostafa G, Carbonell AM, Kercher KW, Norton HJ et al (2007) Outcomes of right- compared with left-side colectomy. Surg Innov 14(2):91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Warschkow R, Beutner U, Steffen T, Müller SA, Schmied BM, Güller U et al (2012) Safe and early discharge after colorectal surgery due to C-reactive protein: a diagnostic meta-analysis of 1832 patients. Ann Surg 256(2):245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan WJ, Ng WQ, Sultana R, de Souza NN, Chew MH, Foo FJ et al (2018) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of serum procalcitonin levels to predict intra-abdominal infections after colorectal surgery. Int J Color Dis 33(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Facy O, Paquette B, Orry D, Santucci N, Rat P, Rat P et al (2017) Inflammatory markers as early predictors of infection after colorectal surgery: the same cut-off values in laparoscopy and laparotomy? Int J Color Dis 32(6):857–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vetel JM, Leroux R, Ducoudray JM (1998) AGGIR. Practical use. Geriatric Autonomy Group Resources Needs. Soins Gerontol 13:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alves A. Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg. 1 mars 2005;140(3):278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krarup P-M, Jorgensen LN, Harling H (2014) Management of anastomotic leakage in a nationwide cohort of colonic cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg 218(5):940–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muñoz JL, Alvarez MO, Cuquerella V, Miranda E, Picó C, Flores R et al (2018) Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early markers of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Surg Endosc 32(9):4003–4010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giaccaglia V, Salvi PF, Cunsolo GV, Sparagna A, Antonelli MS, Nigri G et al (2014) Procalcitonin, as an early biomarker of colorectal anastomotic leak, facilitates enhanced recovery after surgery. J Crit Care 29(4):528–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fierens J, Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, D’Hoore A (2012) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol: prospective study of outcome in colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Belg 112(5):355–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gignoux B, Pasquer A, Vulliez A, Lanz T (2015) Outpatient colectomy within an enhanced recovery program. J Visceral Surg 152(1):11–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chasserant P, Gosgnach M (2016) Improvement of peri-operative patient management to enable outpatient colectomy. J Visceral Surg 153(5):333–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Murray ACA, Chiuzan C, Kiran RP (2016) Risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colectomy. Surg Endosc 30(12):5275–5282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Levack M. Laparoscopy decreases anastomotic leak rate in sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Arch Surg. 1 févr 2011;146(2):207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson MZ, Hollenbeak CS, Stewart DB (2014) Laparoscopic colectomy is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative complications than open colectomy: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis. Color Dis 16(5):382–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Holl S, Fournel I, Orry D, Facy O, Cheynel N, Rat P et al (2017) Should CT scan be performed when CRP is elevated after colorectal surgery? Results from the inflammatory markers after colorectal surgery study. J Visc Surg 154(1):5–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Giaccaglia V, Salvi PF, Antonelli MS, Nigri G, Pirozzi F, Casagranda B et al (2016) Procalcitonin reveals early dehiscence in colorectal surgery: the PREDICS study. Ann Surg 263(5):967–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lagoutte N, Facy O, Ravoire A, Chalumeau C, Jonval L, Rat P et al (2012) C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for the early detection of anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: pilot study in 100 patients. J Visc Surg 149(5):e345–e349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia-Granero A, Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Blanco F, Puga R, Carratalá A et al (2013) Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early predictors of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a prospective observational study. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Juvany M, Guirao X, Oliva JC, Badía Pérez JM (2017) Role of combined post-operative venous lactate and 48 hours C-reactive protein values on the etiology and predictive capacity of organ-space surgical site infection after elective colorectal operation. Surg Infect 18(3):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Emeric Abet contributed to study design, collected and analyzed the data, and revised the manuscript. Farouk Drissi collected and analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. Clement Couëtte collected and analyzed data and co-wrote the manuscript. Marc-Henri Jean and Juliette Podevin recruited patients. Fabrice Denimal recruited patients and analyzed data. Emilie Duchalais recruited patients, contributed to data collection and analysis. Guillaume Meurette contributed to study design and data analysis. He recruited patients and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farouk Drissi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abet, E., Drissi, F., Couëtte, C. et al. Predictive value of inflammatory markers for postoperative recovery following colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 35, 1125–1131 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03594-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03594-y

Keywords

Navigation