Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence of urachal remnants in children according to age and their anatomic variants

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to elucidate the prevalence of urachal remnants in children in relation to patient age as well as to identify their anatomic variants, using a laparoscopic view.

Methods

The medical records of 394 pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were reviewed. Patients were divided into four groups based on their age at surgery. Using laparoscopic visualization, the presence and anatomic variants of urachal remnants were analyzed.

Results

A urachal remnant was confirmed in 140 children (35.5%). Although the prevalence was significantly higher in the group of children aged < 1 year (63.2%) than in any other group, no significant difference in the prevalence was observed between the groups aged ≥ 1 year. In 42 cases (10.7%), the urachal remnant merged into the lateral umbilical ligament.

Conclusions

Our results suggest a recommendation of nonoperative management of asymptomatic urachal remnants, especially in patients less than 1 year of age due to its probable spontaneous resolution. Knowledge of the anatomic variants could improve the accuracy of diagnosis of urachal remnants and the comprehension of its structure and localization for the achievement of accurate and complete excision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blichert-Toft M, Koch F, Nielsen OV (1973) Anatomic variants of the urachus related to clinical appearance and surgical treatment of urachal lesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 137:51–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCollum MO, Macneily AE, Blair GK (2003) Surgical implications of urachal remnants: presentation and management. J Pediatr Surg 38:798–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashley RA, Inman BA, Routh JC, Rohlinger AL, Husmann DA, Kramer SA (2007) Urachal anomalies: a longitudinal study of urachal remnants in children and adults. J Urol 178:1615–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gleason JM, Bowlin PR, Bagli DJ, Lorenzo AJ, Hassouna T, Koyle MA, Farhat WA (2015) A comprehensive review of pediatric urachal anomalies and predictive analysis for adult urachal adenocarcinoma. J Urol 193:632–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Y, Hennequin-Delerue C, Chaillet D, Dubrulle F, Biserte J, Lemaitre L (1996) Urachal remnants: sonographic assessment. J Clin Ultrasound 24:339–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Widni EE, Hollwarth ME, Haxhija EQ (2010) The impact of preoperative ultrasound on correct diagnosis of urachal remnants in children. J Pediatr Surg 45:1433–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu JS, Kim KW, Lee HJ, Lee YJ, Yoon CS, Kim MJ (2001) Urachal remnant diseases: spectrum of CT and US findings. Radiographics 21:451–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueno T, Hashimoto H, Yokoyama H, Ito M, Kouda K, Kanamaru H (2003) Urachal anomalies: ultrasonography and management. J Pediatr Surg 38:1203–1207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Galati VG, Donovan B, Ramji F (2008) Management of urachal remnants in early childhood. J Urol 180:1824–1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zieger B, Sokol B, Rohrschneider WK, Darge K, Tröger J (1998) Sonomorphology and involution of the normal urachus in asymptomatic newborns. Pediatr Radiol 28:156–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stopak JK, Azarow KS, Abdessalam SF, Raynor SC, Perry DA, Cusick RA (2015) Trends in surgical management of urachal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 50:1334–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sato H, Furuta S, Tsuji S, Kawase H, Kitagawa H (2015) The current strategy for urachal remnants. Pediatr Surg Int 31:581–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dethlefs CR, Abdessalam SF, Raynor SC, Perry DA, Allbery SM, Lyden ER, Azarow KS, Cusick RA (2019) Conservative management of urachal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 54:1054–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zenitani M, Saka R, Sasaki T, Takama Y, Tani G, Tanaka N, Ueno T, Tazuke Y, Oue T, Okuyama H (2019) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia in infants younger than 6 months: a comparison with conventional open repair. Asian J Endosc Surg 12:439–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schubert GE, Pavkovic MB, Bethke-Bedürftig BA (1982) Tubular urachal remnants in adult bladders. J Urol 127:40–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pinthus JH, Haddad R, Trachtenberg J, Holowaty E, Bowler J, Herzenberg AM, Jewett M, Fleshner NE (2006) Population based survival data on urachal tumors. J Urol 175:2042–2047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ceylan H, Sirikci A, Kilicaslan S, Gumusburun E (2003) An unusual localization of an infected urachal sinus. J Pediatr Surg 8:1117–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boyle G, Rosenberg HK, O’Neill J (1988) An unusual presentation of an infected urachal cyst. Review of urachal anomalies. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 27:130–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kenigsberg K (1975) Infection of umbilical artery stimulating patent urachus. J Pediatr 86:151–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mackie GG, Zaitoon MM, Jequier S (1982) Umbilical artery sinus Rare cause of umbilical drainage. Urology 19:414–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Hyogo College of Medicine Grant for Research Promotion, 2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception or design of the work: MZ; acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: MZ; drafting or revising of the manuscript: MZ, SN; final approval of the version to be published: TO. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Zenitani.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Ethical standards

This study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Hyogo College of Medicine (IRB number: 3700).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zenitani, M., Nose, S. & Oue, T. Prevalence of urachal remnants in children according to age and their anatomic variants. Pediatr Surg Int 38, 1495–1500 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05183-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05183-2

Keywords

Navigation