Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of the right congenital diaphragmatic hernia compared to the left: a 10-year single-center experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The features of right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernias (RCDHs) are quite different from those of left-sided CDHs (LCDHs). We have summarized the features of RCDHs experienced in our institution.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed the cases of patients with CDH registered at our institution between 2011 and 2020. Defects on each side were compared based on prenatal diagnosis, medical treatment, type of surgery, and outcomes.

Results

A total of 101 patients underwent surgery at our institution during the neonatal period, and 11 had RCDHs. RCDHs and LCDHs were significantly different in terms of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (36% vs. 6%, p = 0.002), patch repair (81% vs. 28%, p < 0.001), recurrence rate (36% vs. 11%, p = 0.022), and length of hospital stay (117 days vs. 51 days, p = 0.012). The severity of the fetal diagnosis did not reflect postnatal severity. All patients with RCDH survived to discharge, and there was no significant difference in survival rate between the right and left sides.

Conclusion

Neonates with RCDH required more intensive treatments; however, the survival rate was comparable between RCDH and LCDH. RCDH was significantly different from LCDH and an optimal treatment strategy for RCDHs should be established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagata K, Usui N, Kanamori Y, Takahashi S, Hayakawa M, Okuyama H, Inamura N, Fujino Y, Taguchi T (2013) The current profile and outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a nationwide survey in Japan. J Pediatr Surg 48:738–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.12.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallot D, Boda C, Ughetto S, Perthus I, Robert-Gnansia E, Francannet C, Laurichesse-Delmas H, Jani J, Coste K, Deprest J, Labbe A, Sapin V, Lemery D (2007) Prenatal detection and outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a French registry-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:276–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boloker J, Bateman DA, Wung JT, Stolar CJ (2002) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in 120 infants treated consecutively with permissive hypercapnea/spontaneous respiration/elective repair. J Pediatr Surg 37:357–366. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.30834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Javid PJ, Jaksic T, Skarsgard ED, Lee S, Network CN (2004) Survival rate in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the experience of the Canadian Neonatal Network. J Pediatr Surg 39:657–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.01.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group, Lally KP, Lally PA, Lasky RE, Tibboel D, Jaksic T, Wilson JM, Frenckner B, Van Meurs KP, Bohn DJ, Davis CF, Hirschl RB (2007) Defect size determines survival in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics 120:e651–e657. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Migliazza L, Bellan C, Alberti D, Auriemma A, Burgio G, Locatelli G, Colombo A (2007) Retrospective study of 111 cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and presurgical stabilization. J Pediatr Surg 42:1526–1532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lazar DA, Cass DL, Rodriguez MA, Hassan SF, Cassady CI, Johnson YR, Johnson KE, Johnson A, Moise KJ, Belleza-Bascon B, Olutoye OO (2011) Impact of prenatal evaluation and protocol-based perinatal management on congenital diaphragmatic hernia outcomes. J Pediatr Surg 46:808–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beaumier CK, Beres AL, Puligandla PS, Skarsgard ED, Network CPS (2015) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with right congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study. J Pediatr Surg 50:731–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Skari H, Bjornland K, Haugen G, Egeland T, Emblem R (2000) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a meta-analysis of mortality factors. J Pediatr Surg 35:1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2000.8725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher JC, Jefferson RA, Arkovitz MS, Stolar CJ (2008) Redefining outcomes in right congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 43:373–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.10.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daher P, Zeidan S, Azar E, Khoury M, Melki I, Mikhael R (2003) Right congenital diaphragmatic hernia a well-known pathology? Pediatr Surg Int 19:293–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-002-0845-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Midrio P, Gobbi D, Baldo V, Gamba P (2007) Right congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an 18-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 42:517–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.10.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hedrick HL, Crombleholme TM, Flake AW, Nance ML, von Allmen D, Howell LJ, Johnson MP, Wilson RD, Adzick NS (2004) Right congenital diaphragmatic hernia: prenatal assessment and outcome. J Pediatr Surg 39:319–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Colvin J, Bower C, Dickinson JE, Sokol J (2005) Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study in Western Australia. Pediatrics 116:e356–e363. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-2845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson JM, Lund DP, Lillehei CW, Vacanti JP (1997) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia–a tale of two cities: the Boston experience. J Pediatr Surg 32:401–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90590-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim AG, Norwitz G, Karmakar M, Ladino-Torres M, Berman DR, Kreutzman J, Treadwell MC, Mychaliska GB, Perrone EE (2020) Discordant prenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI in CDH: wherein lies the truth? J Pediatr Surg 55:1879–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaible T, Kohl T, Reinshagen K, Brade J, Neff KW, Stressig R, Büsing KA (2012) Right- versus left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia: postnatal outcome at a specialized tertiary care center. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182192aa9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jani JC, Benachi A, Nicolaides KH, Allegaert K, Gratacós E, Mazkereth R, Matis J, Tibboel D, Van Heijst A, Storme L, Rousseau V, Greenough A, Deprest JA, Antenatal-CDH-Registry group (2009) Prenatal prediction of neonatal morbidity in survivors with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsao K, Lally KP (2008) The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group: a voluntary international registry. Semin Pediatr Surg 17:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Usui N, Nagata K, Hayakawa M, Okuyama H, Kanamori Y, Takahashi S, Inamura N, Taguchi T (2014) Pneumothoraces as a fatal complication of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the era of gentle ventilation. Eur J Pediatr Surg 24:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1357753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jaffray B, MacKinlay GA (1996) Real and apparent mortality from congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Br J Surg 83:79–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800830125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Touloukian RJ, Markowitz RI (1984) A preoperative x-ray scoring system for risk assessment of newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 19:252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(84)80180-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gibson C, Fonkalsrud EW (1983) Iatrogenic pneumothorax and mortality in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 18:555–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(83)80358-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harrison MR, Bjordal RI, Langmark F, Knutrud O (1978) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the hidden mortality. J Pediatr Surg 13:227–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(78)80391-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Azarow K, Messineo A, Pearl R, Filler R, Barker G, Bohn D (1997) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia—A tale of two cities: the Toronto experience. J Pediatr Surg 32:395–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90589-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Laudy JA, Van Gucht M, Van Dooren MF, Wladimiroff JW, Tibboel D (2003) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: an evaluation of the prognostic value of the lung-to-head ratio and other prenatal parameters. Prenat Diagn 23:634–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kitano Y, Nakagawa S, Kuroda T, Honna T, Itoh Y, Nakamura T, Morikawa N, Shimizu N, Kashima K, Hayashi S, Sago H (2005) Liver position in fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia retains a prognostic value in the era of lung-protective strategy. J Pediatr Surg 40:1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.08.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Muratore CS, Kharasch V, Lund DP, Sheils C, Friedman S, Brown C, Utter S, Jaksic T, Wilson JM (2001) Pulmonary morbidity in 100 survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia monitored in a multidisciplinary clinic. J Pediatr Surg 36:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2001.20031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Byrne F, Keller R, Meadows J, Miniati D, Brook MM, Silverman NH, Moon-Grady AJ (2015) Severe left diaphragmatic hernia limits size of fetal left heart more than does right diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46:688–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rasanen J, Wood DC, Weiner S, Ludomirski A, Huhta JC (1996) Role of the pulmonary circulation in the distribution of human fetal cardiac output during the second half of pregnancy. Circulation 94:1068–1073. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.5.1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Friedman WF (1972) The intrinsic physiologic properties of the developing heart. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 15:87–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-0620(72)90006-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Momma K, Ando M, Mori Y, Ito T (1992) Hypoplasia of the lung and heart in fetal rats with diaphragmatic hernia. Fetal Diagn Ther 7:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000263650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Peralta CF, Cavoretto P, Csapo B, Vandecruys H, Nicolaides KH (2005) Assessment of lung area in normal fetuses at 12–32 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:718–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cannie M, Jani J, Meersschaert J, Allegaert K, Done’ E, Marchal G, Deprest J, Dymarkowski S (2008) Prenatal prediction of survival in isolated diaphragmatic hernia using observed to expected total fetal lung volume determined by magnetic resonance imaging based on either gestational age or fetal body volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:633–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MO: participated in the planning, conducting of the study, interpretation of data, collection and writing of manuscript. HU and HA: contributed to interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. All the authors approved the final submitted draft of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroo Uchida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Ethics approval

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate/publish

Informed consent was obtained from legal guardians.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okamoto, M., Amano, H., Uchida, H. et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of the right congenital diaphragmatic hernia compared to the left: a 10-year single-center experience. Pediatr Surg Int 37, 1675–1681 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04999-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-021-04999-8

Keywords

Navigation