Abstract
Purpose
Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is one of the most important cause of postoperative morbidity in children who underwent abdominal surgery. Laparoscopic management for ASBO in pediatric patients has been reported. However, its safety and efficacy has not been evaluated in details. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopy and laparotomy for the treatment of ASBO in children.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of intervention and the preferred reporting item for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017067914). The primary outcome was the number of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The secondary outcome was length of hospital stay. The risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Quality of evidence was summarized using the grades of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Results
We identified three observational studies and no randomized controlled trials. The meta-analysis was done only for the primary outcome. Complications were significantly fewer after laparoscopy compared to laparotomy (Odds ratio = 0.51; 95% CI 0.40–0.66; p < 0.01; I 2: 0%). The overall risk of bias was considered serious.
Conclusions
Our results, based on observational studies, indicate that laparoscopy for ASBO was associated with less postoperative complications compared to conventional laparotomy. However, the quality of evidence is very low. A well-controlled study is needed to assess the efficacy of laparoscopy for pediatric patients with ASBO.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lautz TB, Barsness KA (2014) Adhesive small bowel obstruction-acute management and treatment in children. Semin Pediart Surg 23:349–352
Festen C (1982) Postoperative small bowel obstruction in infants and children. Ann Surg 196:580–583
Grant HW, Parker MC, Wilson MS et al (2006) Population-based analysis of the risk of adhesion-related readmissions after abdominal surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 41:1453–1456
Grant HW, Parker MC, Wilson MS et al (2008) Adhesions after abdominal surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 43: 152–157
Apelt N, Featherstone N, Giuliani S (2013) Laparoscopic treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction: is it the gold standard in children too? Surg Endosc 27:3927–3928
Anderson SA, Beierle EA, Chen MK (2014) Role of laparoscopy in the prevention and in the treatment of adhesions. Semin Pediatr Surg 23:353–356
Alemayehu H, David B, Desai AA et al (2015) Laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction in children-An update. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25:73–76
Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention. http://www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 7 Oct 2017
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–1012
Miyake H, Seo S, Pierro A (2017) Laparoscopic surgery for infants and children with postoperative bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International prospective register of systematic reviews, PROSPERO, CRD42017067914
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schunemann HJ et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 64:380–382
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:401–406
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 64:407–415
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1277–1282
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz RE et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecsion. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1283–1293
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1294–1302
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence-indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1303–1310
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1311–1316
Sterne JAC, Hernan MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919
Dupont WD, Plummer WD (1990) Power and sample size calculations: a review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 11:116–128
The GRADE working group (2004) https://gradepro.org. Accessed 28 July 2017
van der Zee DC, Bax NMA (1999) Management of adhesive bowel obstruction in children is changed by laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:925–927
Lee J, Tashjian DB, Moriarty KP (2012) Surgical management of pediatric adhesive bowel obstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:917–920
Albertos Mira-Marcelí N, Gallego Mellado N, Deltell Colomer P et al (2015) Treatment of the postoperative bowel obstructions in children: laparoscopic vs. open adhesiolysis. Cir Pediatr 28:123–127
Eeson GA, Wales P, Murphy JJ (2010) Adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: should we still operate? J Pediatr Surg 45:969–974
O’Connor DB, Winter DC (2012) The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: a review of over 2,000 cases. Surg Endosc 26:12–17
Li MZ, Lian L, Xiao L et al (2012) Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 204:779–786
Wiggins T, Markar SR, Harris A (2015) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Endosc 29:3432–3442
Hackenberg T, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: a propensity score-matched analysis. Scand J Surg 106:28–33
Behman R, Nathens AB, Byrne JP et al (2017) Laparoscopic surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction is associated with a higher risk of bowel injury. Ann Surg 266:489–498
Sattarova V, Eaton S, Hall NJ et al (2016) Laparoscopy in pediatric surgery: implementation in Canada and supporting evidence. J Pediatr Surg 51:822–827
Becmeur F, Besson R, GECI (1998) Treatment of small-bowel obstruction by laparoscopy in children multicentric study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 8:343–346
Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Laparoscopic approach to small intestinal obstruction in children: a preliminary experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:301–305
Aguayo P, Fraser JD, Ilyas S et al (2011) Laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:85–88
Acknowledgements
Dr. Agostino Pierro was supported by the endowment of the Robert M. Filler Chair of Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, and by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Foundation Grant. The authors thank the following individuals who have assisted us with foreign language articles: Dr. Yuriy Kolivoshka (Russian), Dr. Bo Li (Chinese), Ms. Daniela Dominguez (Spanish) and Ms. Alison Hock (French).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miyake, H., Seo, S. & Pierro, A. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for adhesive bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 34, 177–182 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4186-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4186-0