Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopy or laparotomy for adhesive bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is one of the most important cause of postoperative morbidity in children who underwent abdominal surgery. Laparoscopic management for ASBO in pediatric patients has been reported. However, its safety and efficacy has not been evaluated in details. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopy and laparotomy for the treatment of ASBO in children.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of intervention and the preferred reporting item for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017067914). The primary outcome was the number of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The secondary outcome was length of hospital stay. The risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Quality of evidence was summarized using the grades of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results

We identified three observational studies and no randomized controlled trials. The meta-analysis was done only for the primary outcome. Complications were significantly fewer after laparoscopy compared to laparotomy (Odds ratio = 0.51; 95% CI 0.40–0.66; p < 0.01; I 2: 0%). The overall risk of bias was considered serious.

Conclusions

Our results, based on observational studies, indicate that laparoscopy for ASBO was associated with less postoperative complications compared to conventional laparotomy. However, the quality of evidence is very low. A well-controlled study is needed to assess the efficacy of laparoscopy for pediatric patients with ASBO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lautz TB, Barsness KA (2014) Adhesive small bowel obstruction-acute management and treatment in children. Semin Pediart Surg 23:349–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Festen C (1982) Postoperative small bowel obstruction in infants and children. Ann Surg 196:580–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Grant HW, Parker MC, Wilson MS et al (2006) Population-based analysis of the risk of adhesion-related readmissions after abdominal surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 41:1453–1456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grant HW, Parker MC, Wilson MS et al (2008) Adhesions after abdominal surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 43: 152–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Apelt N, Featherstone N, Giuliani S (2013) Laparoscopic treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction: is it the gold standard in children too? Surg Endosc 27:3927–3928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson SA, Beierle EA, Chen MK (2014) Role of laparoscopy in the prevention and in the treatment of adhesions. Semin Pediatr Surg 23:353–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alemayehu H, David B, Desai AA et al (2015) Laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction in children-An update. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25:73–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention. http://www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 7 Oct 2017

  9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miyake H, Seo S, Pierro A (2017) Laparoscopic surgery for infants and children with postoperative bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International prospective register of systematic reviews, PROSPERO, CRD42017067914

  11. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schunemann HJ et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 64:380–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 64:407–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1277–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz RE et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecsion. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1283–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1294–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence-indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1303–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1311–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sterne JAC, Hernan MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dupont WD, Plummer WD (1990) Power and sample size calculations: a review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 11:116–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. The GRADE working group (2004) https://gradepro.org. Accessed 28 July 2017

  22. van der Zee DC, Bax NMA (1999) Management of adhesive bowel obstruction in children is changed by laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:925–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee J, Tashjian DB, Moriarty KP (2012) Surgical management of pediatric adhesive bowel obstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:917–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Albertos Mira-Marcelí N, Gallego Mellado N, Deltell Colomer P et al (2015) Treatment of the postoperative bowel obstructions in children: laparoscopic vs. open adhesiolysis. Cir Pediatr 28:123–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eeson GA, Wales P, Murphy JJ (2010) Adhesive small bowel obstruction in children: should we still operate? J Pediatr Surg 45:969–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Connor DB, Winter DC (2012) The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: a review of over 2,000 cases. Surg Endosc 26:12–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li MZ, Lian L, Xiao L et al (2012) Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 204:779–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiggins T, Markar SR, Harris A (2015) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for acute small bowel obstruction: systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Endosc 29:3432–3442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hackenberg T, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: a propensity score-matched analysis. Scand J Surg 106:28–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Behman R, Nathens AB, Byrne JP et al (2017) Laparoscopic surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction is associated with a higher risk of bowel injury. Ann Surg 266:489–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sattarova V, Eaton S, Hall NJ et al (2016) Laparoscopy in pediatric surgery: implementation in Canada and supporting evidence. J Pediatr Surg 51:822–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Becmeur F, Besson R, GECI (1998) Treatment of small-bowel obstruction by laparoscopy in children multicentric study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 8:343–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shalaby R, Desoky A (2001) Laparoscopic approach to small intestinal obstruction in children: a preliminary experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:301–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aguayo P, Fraser JD, Ilyas S et al (2011) Laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:85–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Agostino Pierro was supported by the endowment of the Robert M. Filler Chair of Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, and by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Foundation Grant. The authors thank the following individuals who have assisted us with foreign language articles: Dr. Yuriy Kolivoshka (Russian), Dr. Bo Li (Chinese), Ms. Daniela Dominguez (Spanish) and Ms. Alison Hock (French).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agostino Pierro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miyake, H., Seo, S. & Pierro, A. Laparoscopy or laparotomy for adhesive bowel obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 34, 177–182 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4186-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4186-0

Keywords

Navigation