Skip to main content
Log in

Screening of fetal CNS anomalies by MR imaging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

MR with ultrafast imaging techniques is, nowadays, a standard clinical service in most medical centers for prenatal counseling when sonographic examination is not conclusive or a complicated pregnancy is encountered. Compared with other imaging modalities, MR has multi-faceted superiorities in that it uses non-ionization radiation, it has freedom in selecting an imaging plane, it produces standardized and easily reproducible imaging views, it provides excellent tissue contrast and overview of the fetus, there is no scanning dead space, and no limit to penetration depth. Central nervous system anomalies are the most common indications for fetal MR imaging.

Technical aspects

Among the various ultrafast imaging techniques, T2-weighted imaging, e.g., spin echo-based half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and gradient echo-based steady-state free precession, and T1-weighted imaging, e.g., fast low angle shot and fast spoiled gradient recalled sequences, are commonly used.

Future

In the future, morphometry in three dimensions, real-time imaging, and the functional and metabolic evaluation of the fetal brain will be the important ongoing challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chung HW, Chen CY, Zimmerman RA, Lee KW, Lee CC, Chin SC (2000) T2-weighted fast MR imaging with true FISP versus HASTE: comparative efficacy in the evaluation of normal fetal brain maturation. Am J Roentgenol 175:1375–1380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coakley FV, Hricak H, Filly RA, Barkovich A, Harison MR (1999) Complex fetal disorders: effect of MR imaging on management—preliminary clinical experience. Radiology 213:691–696

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Duerk JL, Lewin JS, Wendt M, Petersilge C (1998) Remember true FISP? A high SNR, near 1-second imaging method for T2-like contrast in interventional MRI at .2T. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:203–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo WY, Chang CY, Ho DMT, Wong TT, Sheu MH, Cheng HC, Chen SJ, Hung JH (2001) A comparative MR and pathological study on fetal CNS disorders. Childs Nerv Syst 17:512–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kubik-Huch RA, Wildermuth S, Cettuzzi L, Rake A, Seifert B, Chaoui R, Marincek B (2001) Fetus and uteroplacental unit: fast MR imaging with three-dimensional reconstruction and volumetry feasibility study. Radiology 219:567–573

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levine D, Barnes PD (1999) Cortical maturation in normal and abnormal fetuses as assessed with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 210:751–758

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Levine D, Hatabu H, Gaa J, Atkinson MW, Edelman RR (1996) Fetal anatomy revealed with fast MR sequences. Am J Roentgenol 167:905–908

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Levine D, Barnes PD, Madsen JR, Li W, Edelman RR (1997) Fetal central nervous system anomalies: MR imaging augments sonographic diagnosis. Radiology 204:635–642

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oi S, Honda Y, Hidaka M, Sato O, Matsumoto S (1998) Intrauterine high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in fetal hydrocephalus and prenatal estimation of postnatal outcomes with "perspective classification". J Neurosurg 88:685–694

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinn TM, Hubbard AM, Adzick NS (1998) Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging enhanced fetal diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg 33:553–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Revel MP, Pons JC, Lelaidier C, Fournet P, Vial M, Musset D, Labrune M, Frydman R (1993) Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus: a study of 20 cases performed without curarization. Prenat Diagn 13:775–799

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shellock FG, Kanal E (1991) Policies, guidelines and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management. J Magn Reson Imaging 1:97–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sutton LN, Adzick NS, Bilaniuk LT, Johnson MP, Crombleholme TM, Flake AW (1999) Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA 282:1826–1831

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Seki T, Mizutami Y, Hachiya J (1996) Short communication: MR imaging of fetal brain abnormalities using a HASTE sequence. Br J Radiol 69:668–670

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, Armstrong EG, Nisula BC (1988) Incidences of early pregnancy loss. N Engl J Med 319:189–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Abe T, Takahashi M, Iwamasa J, Miyazaka K, Okamura H (1997) MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence. Am J Roentgenol 168:513–519

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The study is supported in part by research grant NSC90–2314-B-075–088.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan-Yuo Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, WY., Wong, TT. Screening of fetal CNS anomalies by MR imaging. Childs Nerv Syst 19, 410–414 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0762-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0762-9

Keywords

Navigation