Skip to main content
Log in

Bargaining over the budget

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a theory of government expenditure and identifies how an inefficient government budget is shaped by its initial size and allocation. Assuming that the parties in the legislative body agree with the optimal size of a government budget but have conflict of interests over its allocation, we show that, if the initial budget size is sufficiently large and the initial allocation is sufficiently unequal, in equilibrium the budget size is greater than what it would be had the initial budget size been sufficiently small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion P, Bolton P (1990) Government domestic debt and the risk of a default: a political-economic model of a strategic role of debt. In: Dornbusch R, Draghi M (eds) Public debt management: theory and history. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron DP (1996) A dynamic theory of collective goods programs. Am Polit Sci Rev 90: 316–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron DP, Diermeier D (2001) Elections, governments, and parliaments in proportional representation systems. Q J Econ 116: 933–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron DP, Ferejohn J (1989) Bargaining in legislatures. Am Polit Sci Rev 83: 1181–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron DP, Diermeier D, Fong P (2008) A Dynamic theory of a parliamentary democracy. CMS-EMS Discussion Paper No. 1464

  • Battaglini M, Coate S (2007) Inefficiency in legislative policy-making: a dynamic analysis. Am Econ Rev 97: 118–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglini M, Coate S (2008) A dynamic theory of public spending, taxation and debt. Am Econ Rev 98: 201–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1967) Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of the urban crisis. Am Econ Rev 57: 415–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim D, Rangel A, Rayo L (2006) The power of the last word in legislative policy making. Econometrica 74: 1161–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding T (1977) Budgets and bureaucrats: the sources of government growth. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey JM, Shugart MS (1992) Presidents and assemblies: constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chari VV, Jones LE, Marimon R (1997) The economics of split-ticket voting in representative democracies. Am Econ Rev 87: 957–976

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub JA (2006) Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Diermeier D, Feddersen T (1998) Cohesion in legislatures and the vote of confidence procedure. Am Polit Sci Rev 92: 611–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diermeier D, Fong P (2008) Policy persistence in a multi-party parliamentary democracy. In: Elhanan H (ed) Institutions and economic performance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Diermeier D, Fong P (2011) Legislative bargaining with reconsideration. Q J Econ, Forthcoming

  • Duggan J, Kalandrakis T (2010) Dynamic legislative policy making. Mimeo

  • Hassler J, Mora JVR, Storesletten K, Zilibottiet F (2003) The survival of the welfare state. Am Econ Rev 93: 87–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassler J, Krusell P, Storesletten K, Zilibottiet F (2005) The dynamics of government. J Monet Econ 52: 1331–1358

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs R (1987) Crisis and leviathan: critical episodes in the growth of American government. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalandrakis T (2004) A three-player dynamic majoritarian bargaining game. J Econ Theory 16: 294–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein PJ (1985) Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer AH, Richard SF (1981) A rational theory of the size of government. J Polit Econ 89: 914–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milesi-Ferretti GM, Perotti R, Rostagno M (2002) Electoral systems and public spending. Q J Econ 117: 609–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morelli M (1999) Demand competition and policy compromise in legislative bargaining. Am Polit Sci Rev 93: 809–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Svensson L (1989) Why a stubborn conservative would run a deficit: policy with time-inconsistency preferences. Q J Econ 104: 325–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Tabellini G (2000) Political economics: explaining economic policy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Tabellini G (2003) The economic effects of constitutions. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Tabellini G (2004) Constitutional rules and fiscal policy outcomes. Am Econ Rev 94: 25–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Roland G, Tabellini G (1998) Towards micropolitical foundations of public finance. Eur Econ Rev 42: 685–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Roland G, Tabellini G (2000) Comparative politics and public finance. J Polit Econ 108: 1121–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JA, Torvick R (2008) Endogenous presidentialism. NBER Working Paper No. 14603

  • Romer T, Rosenthal H (1978) Political resource allocation, controlled agendas and the status quo. Public Choice 33: 27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50: 97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter PC, Lehmbruch G (1979) Trends toward coporatist intermediation. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini G (1987) Money, debt and deficits in a dynamic game. J Econ Dyn Control 10: 427–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabellini G, Alesina A (1990) Voting on the budget deficit. Am Econ Rev 80: 37–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Volden C, Wiseman A (2007) Bargaining in legislatures over particularistic and collective goods. Am Polit Sci Rev 101: 79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast BR, Shepsle KA, Johnsen C (1981) The political economy of benefits and costs: a neoclassical approach to distributive politics. J Polit Econ 89: 642–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C (2010) The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development. J Econ Lit, Forthcoming

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pohan Fong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diermeier, D., Fong, P. Bargaining over the budget. Soc Choice Welf 36, 565–589 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0510-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0510-5

Keywords

Navigation