Abstract
A new approach is developed to identify marginal tax reforms for pairs of commodities and to test for the robustness of their impacts on Yaari’s dual social welfare functions. The rank-dependent social evaluation approach gives rise to a new device, the s-concentration curve, which is a generalization of the standard concentration curve. The s-concentration curves are provided for every order of positional dominance and an illustration is performed using Canadian data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaberge R (2000) Characterizations of Lorenz curves and income distributions. Soc Choice Welf 17:639–653
Aaberge R (2004) Ranking intersecting Lorenz curves. Working Paper No. 45, CEIS Tor Vergata Research Paper Series
Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263
Besley T, Kanbur R (1988) Food subsidies and poverty alleviation. Econo J 98:701–719
Chateauneuf A, Gajdos T, Wilthien P-H (2002) The principle of strong diminishing transfer. J Econ Theory 103:311–333
Dalton H (1920) The measurement of the inequality of incomes. Econ J 30:348–361
Davidson R, Duclos J-Y (2000) Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 68(6):1435–1464
Donaldson D, Weymark JA (1980), A single parameter generalization of the Gini indices of inequality. J Econ Theory 22:67–86
Duclos J-Y, Makdissi P (2004) Restricted and unrestricted dominance for welfare, inequality and poverty Orderings. J. Public Econ Theory 6(1):145–164
Duclos J-Y, Makdissi P, Wodon Q (2004) Socially-improving tax reforms. Mimeo
Duclos J-Y, Makdissi P, Wodon Q (2005) Poverty-dominant transfer programs: the role of targeting and allocation rules. J Develop Econ 77:53–73
Fishburn PC, Willig RD (1984) Transfer principles in income redistribution. J Public Econ 25:323–328
Gajdos T (2002) Measuring inequalities without linearity in envy: Choquet integrals for symmetric capacities. J Econ Theory 106:190–200
Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Polya G (1929) Some simple inequalities satisfied by convex functions. Messeng Math 58:145–152
Kakwani NC (1980) On a class of poverty measures. Econometrica 48:437–446
King MA (1983) Welfare analysis of tax reforms using household data. J Public Econ 21:183–214
Kolm SC (1976a) Unequal inequlities I. J Econ Theory 12:416–442
Kolm SC (1976b) Unequal inequlities II. J Econ Theory 13:82–111
Lambert PJ (2001) The distribution and redistribution of income, 3rd edn. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Makdissi P, Wodon Q (2002) Consumption dominance curves: testing for the impact of indirect tax reforms on poverty. Econ Lett 75:227–235
Mayshar J, Yitzhaki S (1995) Dalton-improving tax reforms. Ame Econ Rev 85(4):793–807
Mehran F (1976) Linear measures of income inequality. Econometrica 44:805–809
Pen J (1971) Income distribution: facts, theories, policies. Preaeger, New York
Pigou AC (1912) Wealth and welfare. Macmillan, London
Wildasin DE (1984) On public good provision with distortionary taxation. Econ Inquiry 22:227–243
Yaari ME (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55:99–115
Yaari ME (1988) A controversial proposal concerning inequality measurement. J Econ Theory 44:381–397
Yitzhaki S, Slemrod J (1991) Welfare dominance: an application to commodity taxation. Am Econ Rev 81:480–496
Yitzhaki S, Thirsk W (1990) Welfare dominance and the design of excise taxation in the Côte d’Ivoire. J Develo Econ 33:1–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We thank Jean-Yves Duclos, Peter Lambert, and an anonymous referee for insightful comments and suggestions. This paper was funded through the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of the Government of Canada and the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture of the Government of Quebec.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Makdissi, P., Mussard, S. Analyzing the impact of indirect tax reforms on rank-dependent social welfare functions: a positional dominance approach. Soc Choice Welfare 30, 385–399 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0237-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0237-0