Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

(Medizin-)Produkthaftung für Bruchgefahr einer Hüftprothese

ProdHaftG §§3, 1 Abs. 1, 4; BGB §823 Abs. 1

  • RECHTSPRECHUNG
  • Published:
Medizinrecht Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Zum Vorliegen eines Produktfehlers bei einem gebrochenen Keramikinlay einer Hüftendoprothese.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Consortia

BGH, Urt. v. 1.8.2023 – VI ZR 82/22 (OLG Brandenburg)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

BGH, Urt. v. 1.8.2023 – VI ZR 82/22 (OLG Brandenburg). (Medizin-)Produkthaftung für Bruchgefahr einer Hüftprothese. MedR 42, 366–371 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00350-024-6747-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00350-024-6747-2

Search

Navigation