Skip to main content
Log in

Materialeigenschaften von Kunstlinsen: Gibt es patientenrelevante Unterschiede?

Material properties of intraocular lenses: are there patient-relevant differences?

  • Leserbriefe
  • Published:
Der Ophthalmologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Leserbriefe to this article was published on 03 September 2021

The Original Article was published on 17 July 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Kern C, Priglinger S, Mackert MJ (2021) Intraocular lens opacification after combined cataract and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Ophthalmologe 118(7):724–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khoramnia R, Yildirim TM, Labuz G, Mayer CS, Auffarth GU (2021) Opacification of intraocular lenses: laboratory and clinical findings. Ophthalmologe 118(7):633–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neuhann T, Yildirim TM, Son HS, Merz PR, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU (2020) Reasons for explantation, demographics, and material analysis of 200 intraocular lens explants. J Cataract Refract Surg 46(1):20–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khoramnia R (2021) Opacification of intraocular lenses. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 238(7):831–842. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1472-0570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khoramnia R, Salgado JP, Auffarth GU, Schmidt S, Wegner A, Kobuch KA, Winkler von Mohrenfels C (2012) Opacification of a hydrophilic intraocular lens 4 years after cataract surgery. A biomaterial analysis. Ophthalmologe 109(5):483–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-011-2487-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanclerz P, Yildirim TM, Khoramnia R (2021) A review of late intraocular lens opacifications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 32(1):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanclerz P, Yildirim TM, Khoramnia R (2021) Microscopic characteristics of late intraocular lens opacifications. Arch Pathol Lab Med 145(6):759–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tandogan T, Auffarth GU, Choi CY, Son HS, Khoramnia R (2021) Comparative analysis of in vitro accelerated glistening formation in foldable hydrophobic intraocular lenses. Int Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01870-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yildirim TM, Labuz G, Hammer M, Son HS, Schickhardt SK, Auffarth GU, Khoramnia R (2021) A novel approach for assessing visual impairment caused by intraocular lens opacification: high-resolution optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 226:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fung SS, Sykakis E, Islam NM, Zambarakji HJ, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU, Parmar DN (2015) Intraocular lens opacification following intracameral injection of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to treat inflammatory membranes after cataract surgery. J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/975075

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Marcovich AL, Tandogan T, Bareket M, Eting E, Kaplan-Ashiri I, Bukelman A, Auffarth GU, Khoramnia R (2018) Opacification of hydrophilic intraocular lenses associated with vitrectomy and injection of intraocular gas. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 3(1):e157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Milojcic C, Latz C, Tandogan T, Auffarth GU, Holz FG, Choi CY, Khoramnia R (2017) Opacification of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after DMEK: a material analysis. Ophthalmologe 114(9):832–837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yildirim TM, Auffarth GU, Labuz G, Bopp S, Son HS, Khoramnia R (2018) Material analysis and optical quality assessment of opacified hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses after pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 193:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giers BC, Tandogan T, Auffarth GU, Choi CY, Auerbach FN, Sel S, Mayer C, Khoramnia R (2017) Hydrophilic intraocular lens opacification after posterior lamellar keratoplasty—a material analysis with special reference to optical quality assessment. BMC Ophthalmol 17(1):150

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramin Khoramnia FEBO.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

R. Khoramnia, C.S. Mayer, G. Łabuz, T.M. Yildirim, V.A. Augustin und G.U. Auffarth geben an, dass das David J Apple Center for Vision Research von diesen Firmen unterstützt wird: Alcon, Bausch & Lomb, Johnson & Johnson, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Hoya, Kowa, Teleon, Rayner, Santen, Sifi, Biotech, Acufocus, Anew, Contamac und Physiol.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoramnia, R., Mayer, C.S., Łabuz, G. et al. Materialeigenschaften von Kunstlinsen: Gibt es patientenrelevante Unterschiede?. Ophthalmologe 118, 1066–1067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01490-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01490-6

Navigation