Abstract
Purpose
In this review, we aim to provide readers with a balanced understanding of all aspects of single incision robotic cystectomy (SIRC) and urinary diversion using the single-port (SP) robot. The review will trace the historical progression from open surgery to the introduction of minimally invasive approaches and present an in-depth description of the SIRC technique, offering a step-by-step guide for reference. Emphasis will be placed on indications and patient selection criteria to equip surgeons with well-rounded insights for decision-making.
Methods
The review analyzes preliminary surgical outcomes by drawing from existing literature and clinical experiences, endeavoring to present a balanced view of the potential benefits and limitations. Addressing the learning curve and training prerequisites is paramount, and this review explores strategies and challenges in preparing surgeons for proficiency. Finally, the focus shifts to current challenges and future directions, identifying key issues and potential advancements in the field.
Conclusions
By presenting historical context, technical insights, clinical evidence, and strategic foresight, the review aims to provide a comprehensive resource that engages surgeons, researchers, and trainees from diverse perspectives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dalbagni G, Genega E, Hashibe M et al (2001) Cystectomy for bladder cancer: a contemporary series. J Urol 165:1111
Stimson CJ, Chang SS, Barocas DA et al (2010) Early and late perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy: 90-day readmissions, morbidity and mortality in a contemporary series. J Urol 184:1296
Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP et al (1992) Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol 148:1140
Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A et al (2003) Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 92:232
Tyson M, Andrews P, Cheney S et al (2021) Single incision robotic cystectomy and hybrid orthotopic neobladder reconstruction: a step by step description. Urology 156:285
Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP et al (2018) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 391:2525
Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD et al (2015) Comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 67:1042
Catto JWF, Khetrapal P, Ricciardi F et al (2022) Effect of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy on 90-day morbidity and mortality among patients with bladder cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 328:1258
Tyson MD, Mi L (2023) Preliminary surgical outcomes after single incision robotic cystectomy (SIRC). Urology 171:127
Kaouk J, Garisto J, Eltemamy M et al (2019) Single-port robotic intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion during radical cystectomy using the SP surgical system: step-by-step technique. Urology 130:196
Kaouk J, Aminsharifi A, Sawczyn G et al (2020) Single-port robotic urological surgery using purpose-built single-port surgical system: single-institutional experience with the first 100 cases. Urology 140:77
Ali D, Sawhney R, Billah M et al (2022) Single-port robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal bowel diversion: initial experience and review of surgical outcomes. J Endourol 36:216
Gross JT, Vetter JM, Sands KG et al (2021) Initial experience with single-port robot-assisted radical cystectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes between single-port and conventional multiport approaches. J Endourol 35:1177
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Grant Number P30 CA015083 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and from the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery (M.D.T.), the Christian Haub Family Career Development Award for Cancer Research Honoring Dr. Richard Emslander (M.D.T.), Eric and Gail Blodgett (M.D.T.) and the Endras Family (M.D.T.).
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MDT: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
M.D. Tyson has no financial or other conflict of interest related to this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study is in compliance with the ethical standards established by the World Journal of Urology, including adherence to guidelines for research involving human and animal subjects, conflict of interest disclosures, and informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tyson, M.D. Single incision robotic cystectomy and urinary diversion. World J Urol 42, 45 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04751-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04751-y