Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic utility of penile ultrasound in Peyronie’s disease

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To review the literature regarding the use of penile ultrasound in the evaluation and management of Peyronie’s disease.

Methods

A literature review was performed using PubMed from 1980 to 2018 using the keywords: Peyronie’s disease, ultrasound, sonography, calcification, penile fracture, and penile hematoma. Articles were reviewed for study size, image protocols, and findings. In addition, we reviewed images from 227 penile ultrasounds performed on Peyronie’s disease patients at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center between 2014 and 2018.

Results

Through extensive urological and radiographic literature review over the last four decades, common patterns and characteristic of Peyronie’s plaques were identified. These characteristics are not always delineated by physical examination alone. The ultrasound images often added objective information including etiology of erectile dysfunction and location or plaques, and presence of calcifications which aid in patient counseling and treatment protocols.

Conclusions

The use of B-mode ultrasound with color Doppler in the evaluation and management of Peyronie’s disease is a quick, cost-effective process that provides objective information that can assist the urologist in the treatment of patients with Peyronie’s disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jung DC, Park SY, Lee JY (2018) Penile doppler ultrasonography revisited. Ultrasonography 37(1):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altaffer L, Jordan G (1981) Sonographic demonstration of Peyronie’s plaques. Urology 17:292–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Punjani N, Stern N, Brock G (2018) Characterization of septal and punctate scarring in Peyronie’s disease. Urology 118:87–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bella AJ, Sener A, Foell K, Brock GB (2007) Nonpalpable scarring of the penile septum as a cause of erectile dysfunction: an atypical form of Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 4:226–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ralph D, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Mirone V, Perovic S, Sohn M, Usta M, Levine L (2010) The management of Peyronie’s disease: evidence-based 2010 guidelines. J Sex Med 7(7):2359–2374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bekos A, Arvaniti M, Hatzimouratidis K, Moysidis K, Tzortzis V, Hatzichristou D (2008) The natural history of Peyronie’s disease: an ultrasonography-based study. Eur Urol 53(3):644–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalokairinou K, Konstantinidis C, Domazou M, Kalogeropoulos T, Kosmidis P, Gekas A (2012) US imaging in Peyronie’s disease. J Clin Imaging Sci 2:63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gelbard M, Goldstein I, Hellstrom WJ, McMahon CH, Smith T, Tursi J, Jones N, Kaufman GJ, Carson CC III (2013) Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of collagenase clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of peyronie’s disease in 2 large double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies. J Urol 190(1):199–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta N, Goyal P, Sharma K et al (2017) Penile fracture: role of ultrasound. Transl Androl Urol 6(3):580–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez-Cadavid NF (2009) Mechanism of penile fibrosis. J Sex Med 6:353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung E, De Young L, Brock G (2011) Penile duplex ultrasonography in men with Peyronie’s disease: is it veno-occlusive dysfunction or poor cavernosal arterial inflow that contributes to erectile dysfunction? J Sex Med 8:3446–3451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nehra A, Alterowitz R, Culkin DJ et al (2015) Peyronie’s disease: AUA guideline. J Urol 194(3):745–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hatzimouratidis K, Eardley I, Giuliano F et al (2012) EAU guidelines on penile curvature. Eur Urol 62(3):543–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richards G, Goldenberg E, Pek H, Gilbert B (2014) Penile sonoelastography for the localization of a non-palpable, non-sonographically visualized lesion in a patient with penile curvature from Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med 11:516–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang X, Zhou B, Miranda A, Trost L (2018) A novel noninvasive ultrasound vibroelastography technique for assessing patients with erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease. Urology 16:99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JFM: project development, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing RCD: project development, data collection, manuscript writing and editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. Dean.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Research involving human or animal participants

This review article contains data available from prior publications or data reviewed in a retrospective manner for example only. This study does not contain any studies with human participants or animal participants by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCauley, J.F., Dean, R.C. Diagnostic utility of penile ultrasound in Peyronie’s disease. World J Urol 38, 263–268 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02928-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02928-y

Keywords

Navigation