Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prostatic injection of botulinum toxin is not inferior to optimized medical therapy in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a randomized clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To explore efficacy and safety of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNT-A) prostatic injection in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperperplasia.

Materials and methods

A phase 3 multicenter open-labeled study randomised patients to receive BoNT-A prostatic injection or optimized medical therapy. BoNT-A injection consisted in trans-rectal injections of 200 UI in the transitional zone of the prostate. Optimal medical therapy consisted in oral medication with any drug patented for LUTS. One month (M1) after randomisation patients in the BoNT-A group were asked to stop any medical therapy related to LUTS. The main judgment criterion was the IPSS score at M4. Per-protocol analysis was performed with a non-inferiority hypothesis (ΔIPSS < 3).

Results

127 patients were randomised to BoNT-A (n = 64) or medical therapy (n = 63). At randomisation mean IPSS was 16.9 ± 7.2 in the BoNT-A group vs 15.7 ± 7.3 in control. In the BoNT-A group, 44 patients (73.3%) could interrupt medical therapy for LUTS from M1 to M4. At M4, mean IPSS score was 12.0 ± 6.7 in the BoNT-A group vs 11.8 ± 6.9 in control. After adjustment for baseline IPSS, delta IPSS between groups was 0.01; 95% CI [− 2.14; 2.11] leading to accept the non-inferiority hypothesis.

Conclusions

Four months after BoNT-A injection, most of the patients could interrupt LUTS-related medical treatments. In these patients, IPSS improvement was not inferior to optimized medical treatment, but the study design did not allow to conclude that this improvement was related with study drug rather than with sustained placebo effect.

Trial registration

NCT01275521

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A et al (2013) EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 64:118–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yuan JQ, Mao C, Wong SY et al (2015) Comparative effectiveness and safety of monodrug therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 67:1066–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delongchamps NB, Robert G, Descazeaud A et al (2012) Surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia by endoscopic techniques using electricity and open prostatectomy: a review of the literature by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association. Prog Urol 22:73–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Doggweiler R, Zermann DH, Ishigooka M, Schmidt RA (1998) Botox-induced prostatic involution. Prostate 37:44–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chuang YC, Huang CC, Kang HY et al (2006) Novel action of botulinum toxin on the stromal and epithelial components of the prostate gland. J Urol 175:1158–1163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuo HC, Liu HT (2009) Therapeutic effects of add-on botulinum toxin A on patients with large benign prostatic hyperplasia and unsatisfactory response to combined medical therapy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 43:206–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuo HC (2005) Prostate botulinum A toxin injection—an alternative treatment for benign prostatic obstruction in poor surgical candidates. Urology 65:670–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park DS, Cho TW, Lee YK, Lee YT, Hong YK, Jang WK (2006) Evaluation of short term clinical effects and presumptive mechanism of botulinum toxin type A as a treatment modality of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Yonsei Med J 47:706–714

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brisinda G, Cadeddu F, Vanella S, Mazzeo P, Marniga G, Maria G (2009) Relief by botulinum toxin of lower urinary tract symptoms owing to benign prostatic hyperplasia: early and long-term results. Urology 73:90–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Silva J, Silva C, Saraiva L et al (2008) Intraprostatic botulinum toxin type a injection in patients unfit for surgery presenting with refractory urinary retention and benign prostatic enlargement. Effect on prostate volume and micturition resumption. Eur Urol 53:153–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chuang YC, Chiang PH, Yoshimura N, De Miguel F, Chancellor MB (2006) Sustained beneficial effects of intraprostatic botulinum toxin type A on lower urinary tract symptoms and quality of life in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 98:1033–1037 (discussion 337)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maria G, Brisinda G, Civello IM, Bentivoglio AR, Sganga G, Albanese A (2003) Relief by botulinum toxin of voiding dysfunction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Urology 62:259–264 (discussion 64–65)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marberger M, Chartier-Kastler E, Egerdie B et al (2013) A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 dose-ranging study of onabotulinumtoxinA in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 63:496–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Chartier-Kastler E et al (2014) A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study of onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U to treat lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 192:150–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothmann M, Li N, Chen G, Chi GY, Temple R, Tsou HH (2003) Design and analysis of non-inferiority mortality trials in oncology. Stat Med 22:239–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oeconomou A, Madersbacher H (2010) Botulinum neurotoxin A for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Opin Urol 20:28–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oeconomou A, Madersbacher H, Kiss G, Berger TJ, Melekos M, Rehder P (2008) Is botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) a novel therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement? A review of the literature. Eur Urol 54:765–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lepor H, Sypherd D, Machi G, Derus J (1992) Randomized double-blind study comparing the effectiveness of balloon dilation of the prostate and cystoscopy for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 147:639–642 (discussion 42–44)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Leeuwen JH, Castro R, Busse M, Bemelmans BL (2006) The placebo effect in the pharmacologic treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Eur Urol 50:440–452 (discussion 53)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Welliver C, Kottwitz M, Feustel P, McVary K (2015) Clinically and statistically significant changes seen in sham surgery arms of randomized, controlled benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery trials. J Urol 194:1682–1687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge S. MALECA (clinical research assistant), S. RICARD (clinical research assistant), A. GIMBERT (safety and vigilance unit coordinator, PharmD), and F. SGOIFO (data manager), for their assistance in the conduction of this clinical trial. The authors acknowledge all participating investigators: P. BALLANGER, JM. FERRIERE, G. PASTICIER, JC. BERNHARD. The authors acknowledge S. MALECA (clinical research assistant), S. RICARD (clinical research assistant), A. GIMBERT (safety and vigilance unit coordinator, PharmD), and F. SGOIFO (data manager), for their assistance in the conduction of this clinical trial. The authors acknowledge all participating investigators: P. BALLANGER, JM. FERRIERE, G. PASTICIER, JC. BERNHARD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G. Robert, N. Barry Delongchamps, A. Descazeaud: protocol development, Data collection, Manuscript writing. A. Benard, A. Georget: protocol development, data management, data analysis. G. Karsenty, C. Saussine, M. Fourmarier, A. Azzouzi, A. Faix, F. Desgrandchamps, A. de la Taille: data collection, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grégoire Robert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

The study was founded by an unrestricted grant of the French Ministry of Health (PHRC).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 287 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 217 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robert, G., Descazeaud, A., Karsenty, G. et al. Prostatic injection of botulinum toxin is not inferior to optimized medical therapy in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a randomized clinical trial. World J Urol 36, 921–929 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2193-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2193-y

Keywords

Navigation