Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Radiomics signature of brain metastasis: prediction of EGFR mutation status

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To predict epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma using MR-based radiomics signature of brain metastasis and explore the optimal MR sequence for prediction.

Methods

Data from 52 patients with brain metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma (28 with mutant EGFR, 24 with wild-type EGFR) were retrospectively reviewed. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1-CE), T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR), T2WI, and DWI sequences were selected for radiomics features extraction. A total of 438 radiomics features were extracted from each MR sequence. All sequences were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. The least absolute shrinkage selection operator was used to select informative features, a radiomics signature was built with the logistic regression model of the training cohort, and the radiomics signature performance was evaluated using the validation cohort and an independent testing data set.

Results

The radiomics signature built on 9 selected features showed good discrimination in both the training and validation cohorts for T2-FLAIR. The radiomics signature of T2-FLAIR yielded an AUC of 0.987, a classification accuracy of 0.991, sensitivity of 1.000, and specificity of 0.980 in the validation cohort. The AUC was 0.871 in the independent testing data set. The AUCs of our radiomics signature to differentiate exon 19 and exon 21 mutations were 0.529, 0.580, 0.645, and 0.406 for T1-CE, T2-FLAIR, T2WI, and DWI, respectively.

Conclusions

We developed a T2-FLAIR radiomics signature that can be used as a noninvasive auxiliary tool for predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma, which is helpful to guide therapeutic strategies.

Key Points

• MR-based radiomics signature of brain metastasis may help predict EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma, especially using T2-FLAIR.

• Nine radiomics features extracted from T2-FLAIR sequence strongly correlate with EGFR mutation status.

• Radiomics features reflect tumor heterogeneity through potential changes in tissue morphology caused by EGFR mutation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACC:

Classification accuracy

ARMS-PCR:

Amplification refractory mutation system–polymerase chain reaction

ctDNA:

Circulating tumor DNA

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

FOV:

Field of view

KPS:

Karnofsky Scores

LASSO:

Least absolute shrinkage selection operator

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing technology

PFS:

Progression-free survival

SEN:

Sensitivity

SPE:

Specificity

T1-CE:

Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging

T2-FLAIR:

T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery

TE:

Echo time

TKI:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

TR:

Repetition time

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A et al (2020) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Riihimäki M, Hemminki A, Fallah M et al (2014) Metastatic sites and survival in lung cancer. Lung Cancer 86:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Achrol AS, Rennert RC, Anders C et al (2019) Brain metastases. Nat Rev Dis Primers 5:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang JJ, Zhou C, Huang Y et al (2017) Icotinib versus whole-brain irradiation in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer and multiple brain metastases (BRAIN): a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 5:707–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reungwetwattana T, Nakagawa K, Cho BC et al (2018) CNS response to osimertinib versus standard epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.78.3118:Jco2018783118

  6. Mok TS, Wu YL, Ahn MJ et al (2017) Osimertinib or platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 376:629–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo J, Shen L, Zheng D (2014) Diagnostic value of circulating free DNA for the detection of EGFR mutation status in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 4:6269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Qiu M, Wang J, Xu Y et al (2015) Circulating tumor DNA is effective for the detection of EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24:206–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Merker JD, Oxnard GR, Compton C et al (2018) Circulating tumor DNA analysis in patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review. J Clin Oncol 36:1631–1641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu SG, Rao MY, Zhou J et al (2015) Distribution of metastatic disease in the brain in relation to the hippocampus: a retrospective single-center analysis of 6064 metastases in 632 patients. Oncotarget 6:44030–44036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Takano K, Kinoshita M, Takagaki M et al (2016) Different spatial distributions of brain metastases from lung cancer by histological subtype and mutation status of epidermal growth factor receptor. Neuro Oncol 18:716–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Oikonomou A, Wong A, Haider MA, Khalvati F (2017) Radiomics-based prognosis analysis for non-small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep 7:46349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rizzo S, Botta F, Raimondi S et al (2018) Radiomics: the facts and the challenges of image analysis. Eur Radiol Exp 2:36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu J, Tha KK, Xing L, Li R (2018) Radiomics and radiogenomics for precision radiotherapy. J Radiat Res 59:i25–i31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taguchi N, Oda S, Yokota Y et al (2019) CT texture analysis for the prediction of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer via a machine learning approach. Eur J Radiol 118:38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh JE, Kim MJ, Lee J et al (2020) Magnetic resonance-based texture analysis differentiating KRAS mutation status in rectal cancer. Cancer Res Treat 52:51–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang L, Dong D, Fang M et al (2018) Can CT-based radiomics signature predict KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer? Eur Radiol 28:2058–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tu W, Sun G, Fan L et al (2019) Radiomics signature: a potential and incremental predictor for EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients, comparison with CT morphology. Lung Cancer 132:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Z, Mao Y, Li H, Yu G, Wan H, Li B (2016) Differentiating brain metastases from different pathological types of lung cancers using texture analysis of T1 postcontrast MR. Magn Reson Med 76:1410–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Y, Liu X, Xu L et al (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of treatment efficacy and prognosis for brain metastases in lung cancer patients after radiotherapy: a preliminary study. Thorac Cancer 9:865–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Herlidou-Même S, Constans JM, Carsin B et al (2003) MRI texture analysis on texture test objects, normal brain and intracranial tumors. Magn Reson Imaging 21:989–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Z, Zhang XY, Shi YJ et al (2017) Radiomics analysis for evaluation of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23:7253–7262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yotsukura M, Yasuda H, Shigenobu T et al (2017) Clinical and pathological characteristics of EGFR mutation in operable early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 109:45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Y, Kim J, Balagurunathan Y et al (2016) Radiomic features are associated with EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinomas. Clin Lung Cancer 17:441–448.e446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mei D, Luo Y, Wang Y, Gong J (2018) CT texture analysis of lung adenocarcinoma: can radiomic features be surrogate biomarkers for EGFR mutation statuses. Cancer Imaging 18:52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Digumarthy SR, Padole AM, Gullo RL, Sequist LV, Kalra MK (2019) Can CT radiomic analysis in NSCLC predict histology and EGFR mutation status? Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e13963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Segal E, Sirlin CB, Ooi C et al (2007) Decoding global gene expression programs in liver cancer by noninvasive imaging. Nat Biotechnol 25:675–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Koay EJ, Lee Y, Cristini V et al (2018) A visually apparent and quantifiable CT imaging feature identifies biophysical subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 24:5883–5894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Grossmann P, Stringfield O, El-Hachem N et al (2017) Defining the biological basis of radiomic phenotypes in lung cancer. Elife 6:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Siegelin MD, Borczuk AC (2014) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. Lab Invest 94:129–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jin Y, Li JP, Tang LY et al (2011) Protein expression and significance of VEGF, EGFR and MMP-9 in non-small cell lung carcinomas. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12:1473–1476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang SF, Liu HP, Li LH et al (2004) High frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations with complex patterns in non-small cell lung cancers related to gefitinib responsiveness in Taiwan. Clin Cancer Res 10:8195–8203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brattström D, Wester K, Bergqvist M et al (2004) HER-2, EGFR, COX-2 expression status correlated to microvessel density and survival in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Acta Oncol 43:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qi Y, Cui X, Han M et al (2020) Radiomics analysis of lung CT image for the early detection of metastases in patients with breast cancer: preliminary findings from a retrospective cohort study. Eur Radiol 30:4545–4556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu J, Cui X, Wang B et al (2020) Texture analysis of early cerebral tissue damage in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with lung cancer. Oncol Lett 19:3089–3100

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ng F, Kozarski R, Ganeshan B, Goh V (2013) Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? Eur J Radiol 82:342–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has received funding by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (ID: 81670046) and State Key Laboratory of Computer Architecture (ICT, CAS) (ID: CARCHA202002).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Guangyu Wang and Bomin Wang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cancer Therapy and Research Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 324 Jingwuweiqi Road, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Guangyu Wang & Mingyong Han

  2. School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, 27 Shanda South Road, Jinan, 250100, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Bomin Wang & Zhi Liu

  3. Medical Imaging Department, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, People’s Republic of China

    Zhou Wang & Jianjun Xiu

  4. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University and Healthcare Big Data Institute of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, People’s Republic of China

    Wenchao Li

Authors
  1. Guangyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bomin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhou Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenchao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianjun Xiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mingyong Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhi Liu or Mingyong Han.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Mingyong Han.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• diagnostic or prognostic study

• performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 246 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, G., Wang, B., Wang, Z. et al. Radiomics signature of brain metastasis: prediction of EGFR mutation status. Eur Radiol 31, 4538–4547 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07614-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07614-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation