Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anoperineal disease in Hidradenitis Suppurativa : MR imaging distinction from perianal Crohn’s disease

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS)-related anoperineal disease can be distinguished from Crohn’s disease (CD) using MRI.

Methods

Pelvic MRI of 23 HS and 46 CD patients with anoperineal disease between 2007 and 2014 were independently analysed by two radiologists. For diagnosis of HS, sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratios (LRs) of inflammatory features and of their anatomical distribution were calculated and compared to those of CD.

Results

In HS, fistulae were less present (P = .033) and less frequently involved the sphincters (P = .001) than in CD. Granulomas were more frequent (P = .0005). For anterior/inguinal and posterior localizations, sensitivity, specificity and LR for diagnosis of HS were 70% (49.1, 84.4), 87% (74.3, 93.9), 5.3 (2.41, 11.79) and 57% (36.8, 74.4), 93% (82.5, 97.8), 8.67 (2.74, 27.41), respectively. Combination of signs including posterior involvement, absence of rectal wall thickening and bilaterality of features yielded specificity of 100% (95% CI: 92.3–100) for HS.

Conclusion

Although MRI presentations of anoperineal disease may overlap between CD and HS, specific diagnosis of HS is possible with a combination of three features: absence of features’ predominance in perianal area, absence of rectal wall thickening and bilaterality of features.

Key Points

Spectrum of MRI features of HS-related anoperineal disease is wide.

Specific diagnosis of HS-related anoperineal disease is possible using MR imaging.

A combination of three MR signs allows distinction between HS and CD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alikhan A, Lynch PJ, Eisen DB (2009) Hidradenitis suppurativa: a comprehensive review. J Am Acad Dermatol 60:539–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jansen I, Altmeyer P, Piewig G (2001) Acne inversa (alias hidradenitis suppurativa). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 15:532–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cosmatos I, Matcho A, Weinstein R (2013) Analysis of patient claims data to determine the prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 68:412–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kimball AB, Kerdel F, Adams D et al (2012) Adalimumab for the treatment of moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a parallel randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 157:846–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jemec GBE (2012) Hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med 366:158–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McMillan K (2014) Hidradenitis suppurativa: number of diagnosed patients, demographic characteristics, and treatment patterns in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 179:1477–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dessinioti C, Katsambas A, Antoniou C (2014) Hidradenitis suppurrativa (acne inversa) as a systemic disease. Clin Dermatol 32:397–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dambha F, Tanner J, Carroll N (2014) Diagnostic imaging in Crohn's disease: what is the new gold standard? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 28:421–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Régimbeau JM, Panis Y, De Parades V, Marteau P, Valleur P (2000) Anoperineal manifestations of Crohn's disease. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 24:36–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2003) Pilonidal sinus disease: MR imaging distinction from fistula in ano. Radiology 226:662–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor SA, Avni F, Cronin CG et al (2016) The first joint ESGAR/ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging. Eur Radiol

  12. Kelly AM, Cronin P (2005) MRI features of hidradenitis suppurativa and review of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1201–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffin N, Williams AB, Anderson S et al (2014) Hidradenitis suppurativa: MRI features in anogenital disease. Dis Colon Rectum 57:762–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yazdanyar S, Miller IM, Jemec GB (2010) Hidradenitis suppurativa and Crohn's disease: two cases that support an association. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 19:23–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Zee HH, van der Woude CJ, Florencia EF, Prens EP (2010) Hidradenitis suppurativa and inflammatory bowel disease: are they associated? Results of a pilot study. Br J Dermatol 162:195–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Church JM, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Oakley JR, Milsom JW (1993) The differential diagnosis and comorbidity of hidradenitis suppurativa and perianal Crohn's disease. Int J Color Dis 8:117–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation (2009) San Diego, California 92129 [on line] http://www.hs-foundation.org. Published September 2005. Accessed 15 Nov 2015

  18. Dohan A, Eveno C, Oprea R et al (2014) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the diagnosis of abscess complicating fistula-in-ano: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 24:2906–2915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. De Miguel Criado J, del Salto LG, Rivas PF et al (2012) MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics 32:175–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 271:703–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burrows NP, Jones RR (1992) Crohn's disease in association with hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 126:523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Revuz J (2009) Hidradenitis suppurativa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23:985–998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Luc Vandromme for his contribution to this research. The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Christine Hoeffel. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Methodology: retrospective, diagnostic or prognostic study/observational, multicentre study

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise Monnier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monnier, L., Dohan, A., Amara, N. et al. Anoperineal disease in Hidradenitis Suppurativa : MR imaging distinction from perianal Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol 27, 4100–4109 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4776-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4776-1

Keywords

Navigation