Skip to main content
Log in

Prognosis of spontaneous cervical artery dissection and transcranial Doppler findings associated with clinical outcomes

  • Neuro
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We categorised spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCAD) by radiological features and investigated factors associated with favourable outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed 128 patients with sCAD with a median follow-up duration of 25 months. Twenty-nine constituted the aneurysm group, 52 the stenotic group, and 47 the occlusive group. Various relevant factors, including National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, type of antithrombotic therapy, stroke progression in the first week, and transcranial Doppler (TCD) flow-waveforms (in the occlusive subgroup) were analysed. Favourable outcomes were defined as a 1-year modified Rankin-Scale score of 0–1. Favourable anatomical outcomes were defined as a reversal of dissection-associated stenosis during follow-up.

Results

The aneurysm and stenotic groups showed favourable outcomes, while the occlusive group outcomes were less favourable. In the stenotic group, anticoagulation, an NIHSS score ≥4, and stroke progression were inversely associated with favourable long-term outcomes. Remarkably, in the occlusive group, flow abnormality more severe than minimal flow was associated with stroke progression, unfavourable long-term outcome, and arterial irreversibility.

Conclusions

The outcome of sCAD depends on its radiological subtype. In the occlusive subtype, which is associated with the worst outcome, TCD flow analysis may predict acute stroke progression and long-term outcome.

Key Points

• Outcomes in cervical artery dissection may be determined by radiological subtypes.

• The aneurysm and stenotic groups had favourable outcomes.

• The occlusive group had less favourable functional outcomes.

• Flow-waveform analysis by TCD could predict functional and anatomical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caplan LR (2004) Carotid artery dissection. Current Treatment Options Cardiovasc Med 6:249–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Menon RK, Norris JW (2008) Cervical Arterial Dissection. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1142:200–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dziewas R, Konrad C, Dräger B et al (2003) Cervical artery dissection—clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients. J Neurol 250:1179–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu C-J, Sun Y, Jeng J-S et al (2000) Imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up evaluation of vertebral artery dissection. J Ultrasound Med 19:263–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Steinke W, Rautenberg W, Schwartz A, Hennerici M (1994) Noninvasive monitoring of internal carotid artery dissection. Stroke 25:998–1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nedeltchev K, Bickel S, Arnold M et al (2009) Recanalization of spontaneous carotid artery dissection. Stroke 40:499–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Touze E, Gauvrit J-Y, Moulin T, Meder J-F, Bracard S, Mas J-L (2003) Risk of stroke and recurrent dissection after a cervical artery dissection A multicenter study. Neurology 61:1347–1351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Béjot Y, Daubail B, Debette S, Durier J, Giroud M (2013) Incidence and outcome of cerebrovascular events related to cervical artery dissection: the Dijon Stroke Registry. International Journal of Stroke

  9. Lee VH, Brown RD, Mandrekar JN, Mokri B (2006) Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection A population-based study. Neurology 67:1809–1812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold M, Bousser MG, Fahrni G et al (2006) Vertebral artery dissection presenting findings and predictors of outcome. Stroke 37:2499–2503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Debette S, Leys D (2009) Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Lancet Neurol 8:668–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Touze E, Randoux B, Meary E, Arquizan C, Meder JF, Mas JL (2001) Aneurysmal Forms of Cervical Artery Dissection : Associated Factors and Outcome. Stroke 32:418–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zanette EM, Fieschi C, Bozzao L et al (1989) Comparison of cerebral angiography and transcranial Doppler sonography in acute stroke. Stroke 20:899–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sloan MA, Alexandrov AV, Tegeler CH et al (2004) Assessment: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 62:1468–1481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Demchuk AM, Christou I, Wein TH et al (2000) Specific transcranial Doppler flow findings related to the presence and site of arterial occlusion. Stroke 31:140–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi C, Lee D, Lee J et al (2007) Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T. Am J Neuroradiol 28:439–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bash S, Villablanca JP, Jahan R et al (2005) Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 26:1012–1021

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, Smith HA, Chimowitz MI (2000) A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. Am J Neuroradiol 21:643–646

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Collaborators NASCET (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicoletto HA, Burkman MH (2009) Transcranial Doppler series part II: performing a transcranial Doppler. American journal of electroneurodiagnostic technology 49

  21. Demchuk AM, Christou I, Wein TH et al (2000) Accuracy and criteria for localizing arterial occlusion with transcranial Doppler. J Neuroimaging: Off J Am Soc Neuroimaging 10:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Siegler JE, Martin-Schild S (2011) Early Neurological Deterioration (END) after stroke: the END depends on the definition. Int J Stroke 6:211–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kremer C, Mosso M, Georgiadis D et al (2003) Carotid dissection with permanent and transient occlusion or severe stenosis Long-term outcome. Neurology 60:271–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Engelter ST, Brandt T, Debette S et al (2007) Antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection. Stroke 38:2605–2611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Papaioannou TG, Stefanadis C (2005) Vascular wall shear stress: basic principles and methods. Hellenic J Cardiol 46:9–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weber M, Baker MB, Moore JP, Searles CD (2010) MiR-21 is induced in endothelial cells by shear stress and modulates apoptosis and eNOS activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 393:643–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Garanich JS, Pahakis M, Tarbell JM (2005) Shear stress inhibits smooth muscle cell migration via nitric oxide-mediated downregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H2244–2252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen BP, Li YS, Zhao Y et al (2001) DNA microarray analysis of gene expression in endothelial cells in response to 24-h shear stress. Physiol Genomics 7:55–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng C, Tempel D, van Haperen R et al (2006) Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation 113:2744–2753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ni CW, Qiu H, Jo H (2011) MicroRNA-663 upregulated by oscillatory shear stress plays a role in inflammatory response of endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 300:H1762–1769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Keun-Hwa Jung. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. The requirement for informed consent was waived, as the patients’ medical records and information were anonymized before our analysis. Methodology: retrospective, observational, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keun-Hwa Jung.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental Table 1

Comparison of clinical profiles between spontaneous vertebral and internal carotid artery dissection patients (DOCX 22 kb)

Supplemental Table 2

Factors associated with favourable outcome in the occlusive group: multivariate analysis including flow pattern abnormality (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, WJ., Jung, KH., Moon, J. et al. Prognosis of spontaneous cervical artery dissection and transcranial Doppler findings associated with clinical outcomes. Eur Radiol 26, 1284–1291 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3944-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3944-4

Keywords

Navigation