Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Placental vascularity and resorption delay after conservative management of invasive placenta: MR imaging evaluation

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the potential of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating placental vascularity and predicting placental resorption delay after conservative management of invasive placenta.

Methods

MR examinations of 23 women with conservative management of invasive placenta were reviewed. Twelve women had pelvic embolisation because of postpartum haemorrhage (Group 1) and 11 had no embolisation (Group 2). Comparisons between the two groups were made with respect to the delay for complete placental resorption at follow-up MR imaging and degree of placental vascularity 24 h after delivery on early (30s) and late (180 s) phase of dynamic gadolinium chelate-enhanced MR imaging.

Results

The median delay for complete placental resorption in the cohort study was 21.1 weeks (range, 1-111 weeks). In Group 1, the median delay for complete placental resorption was shorter than in Group 2 (17 vs 32 weeks) (P = 0.036). Decreased placental vascularity on the early phase was observed in Group 1 by comparison with Group 2 (P = 0.003). Significant correlation was found between the degree of vascularity on early phase of dynamic MR imaging and the delay for complete placental resorption (r = 0.693; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

MR imaging provides useful information after conservative management of invasive placenta and may help predict delay for complete placental resorption.

Key Points

• MR imaging is useful after conservative management of invasive placenta.

• MR imaging may help predict delay regarding complete placental resorption.

• Early decreased vascularity correlates with reduced delay of placental resorption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khong TY, Robertson WB (1987) Placenta creta and placenta praevia creta. Placenta 8:399–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hudon L, Belfort MA, Broome DR (1998) Diagnosis and management of placenta percreta: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surg 53:509–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Panoskaltsis TA, Ascarelli A, de Souza N, Sims CD, Edmonds KD (2000) Placenta increta: evaluation of radiological investigations and therapeutic options of conservative management. BJOG 107:802–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O'Brien JM (2007) Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 109:203–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Soyer P, Morel O, Fargeaudou Y, Sirol M, Staub F, Boudiaf M et al (2011) Value of pelvic embolization in the management of severe postpartum hemorrhage due to placenta accreta, increta or percreta. Eur J Radiol 80:729–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bretelle F, Courbiere B, Mazouni C, Agostini A, Cravello L, Boubli L et al (2007) Management of placenta accreta: morbidity and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 133:34–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayes E, Ayida G, Crocker A (2011) The morbidly adherent placenta: diagnosis and management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 23:448–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Mateo J, Soyer P, Jacob D, Kardache M et al (1998) Life-threatening primary postpartum hemorrhage: treatment with emergency selective arterial embolization. Radiology 208:359–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Descargues G, Douvrin F, Degré S, Lemoine JP, Marpeau L, Clavier E (2001) Abnormal placentation and selective embolization of the uterine arteries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 99:47–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Teo SB, Kanagalingam D, Tan HK, Tan LK (2008) Massive postpartum haemorrhage after uterus-conserving surgery in placenta percreta: the danger of the partial placenta percreta. BJOG 115:789–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. La Folie T, Vidal V, Mehanna M, Capelle M, Jaquier A, Moulin G et al (2007) Results of endovascular treatment in cases of abnormal placentation with post-partum hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 33:624–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kayem G, Davy C, Goffinet F, Thomas C, Clément D, Cabrol D (2004) Conservative versus extirpative management in cases of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 104:531–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oyelese Y, Smulian JC (2006) Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 107:927–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kayem G, Pannier E, Goffinet F, Grange G, Cabrol D (2002) Fertility after conservative treatment of placenta accreta. Fertil Steril 78:637–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sentilhes L, Ambroselli C, Kayem G, Provansal M, Fernandez H, Perrotin F et al (2010) Maternal outcome after conservative treatment of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 115:526–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morel O, Desfeux P, Fargeaudou Y, Malartic C, Rossignol M, Perrotez C et al (2009) Uterine conservation despite severe sepsis in a case of placenta accreta first treated conservatively: 3-month delayed successful removal of the placenta. Fertil Steril 91:1957.e5–1957.e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palacios-Jaraquemada JM (2008) Diagnosis and management of placenta accreta. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22:1133–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazouni C, Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, Deter R, Juhan V, Gamerre M, Bretelle F (2009) Differences in the management of suspected cases of placenta accreta in France and Argentina. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107:1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Komulainen MH, Vayrynen MA, Kauko ML, Saarikoski S (1995) Two cases of placenta accreta managed conservatively. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 62:135–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Timmermans S, van Hof AC, Duvekot JJ (2007) Conservative management of abnormally invasive placentation. Obstet Gynecol Surv 62:529–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noonan JB, Coakley FV, Qayyum A, Yeh BM, Wu L, Chen LM (2003) MR imaging of retained products of conception. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:435–439

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Legro RS, Price FV, Caritis SN (1995) Successful conservative treatment of placenta percreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:1648–1649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dinkel HP, Dürig P, Schnatterbeck P, Triller J (2003) Percutaneous treatment of placenta perceta using coil embolization. J Endovasc Ther 10:158–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Greenberg JA, Miner JD, O’Horo SK (2006) Uterine artery embolization and hysteroscopic resection to treat retained placenta accreta: a case report. J Minim invasive Gynecol 13:342–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Diop AN, Chabrot P, Bertrand A, Constantin JM, Cassagnes L, Storme B et al (2010) Placenta accrete: management with uterine artery embolization in 17 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:644–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Alanis M, Hurst BS, Marshburn PB, Matthews ML (2006) Conservative management of placenta increta with selective arterial embolization preserves future fertility and results in a favorable outcome in subsequent pregnancies. Fertil Steril 86:1514.e3–1514.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tanaka YO, Shigemitsu S, Ichikawa Y, Sohda S, Yoshikawa H, Itai Y (2004) Postpartum MR diagnosis of retained placenta accreta. Eur Radiol 14:945–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takahama J, Kitano S, Marugami N, Uehara T, Takahashi A, Takewa M et al (2011) Retained placental tissue: role of MRI findings in diagnosis and clinical assessment. Abdom Imaging 36:110–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. El-Bialy G, Kassab A, Armstrong M (2007) Magnetic resonance imagining (MRI) and serial beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (beta-hCG) follow up for placenta percreta. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:371–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Amoh Y, Watanabe Y, Saga T, Dohke M, Sato N, Mitsudo K et al (1995) Retained placenta accreta: MRI and pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:827–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kanne JP, Lalani TA, Fligner CL (2005) The placenta revisited: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 34:238–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fargeaudou Y, Morel O, Soyer P, Gayat E, Sirol M, Boudiaf M et al (2010) Persistent postpartum haemorrhage after failed arterial ligation: value of pelvic embolisation. Eur Radiol 20:1777–1785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fargeaudou Y, Soyer P, Morel O, Sirol M, le Dref O, Boudiaf M et al (2009) Severe primary postpartum hemorrhage due to genital tract laceration after operative vaginal delivery: successful treatment with transcatheter arterial embolization. Eur Radiol 19:2197–2203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Soyer P, Fargeaudou Y, Morel O, Boudiaf M, Le Dref O, Rymer R (2008) Severe postpartum haemorrhage from ruptured pseudoaneurysm: successful treatment with transcatheter arterial embolization. Eur Radiol 18:1181–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gowland P (2005) Placental MRI. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 10:485–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guiot C, Gaglioti P, Oberto M, Piccoli E, Rosato R, Todros T (2008) Is three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound useful in the assessment of placental perfusion in normal and growth-restricted pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:171–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Francis ST, Duncan KR, Moore RJ, Baker PN, Johnson IR, Gowland PA (1998) Non-invasive mapping of placental perfusion. Lancet 351:1397–1399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Duncan KR, Gowland P, Francis S, Moore R, Baker PN, Johnson IR (1998) The investigation of placental relaxation and estimation of placental perfusion using echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Placenta 19:539–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Marcos HB, Semelka RC, Worawattanakul S (1997) Normal placenta: gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 205:493–496

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Salomon LJ, Siauve N, Balvay D, Cuenod CA, Vayssettes C, Luciani A et al (2005) Placental perfusion MR imaging with contrast agents in a mouse model. Radiology 235:73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chalouhi GE, Deloison B, Siauve N, Aimot S, Balvay D, Cuenod CA et al (2011) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: definitive imaging of placental function? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 16:22–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Neish AS, Frates MC, Tempany CM (1995) Placenta percreta post evacuation: an unusual uterine mass on MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:824–827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Pelage JP, Soyer P, Repiquet D, Herbreteau D, Le Dref O, Houdart E et al (1999) Secondary postpartum hemorrhage: treatment with selective arterial embolization. Radiology 212:385–389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Soyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soyer, P., Sirol, M., Fargeaudou, Y. et al. Placental vascularity and resorption delay after conservative management of invasive placenta: MR imaging evaluation. Eur Radiol 23, 262–271 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2573-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2573-4

Keywords

Navigation