Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reliability of OMERACT ultrasound elementary lesions in gout: results from a multicenter exercise

  • Imaging
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the outcome measures in rheumatology (OMERACT) definitions for ultrasound (US) elementary lesions in gout through an image reading exercise. Images from patients with gout (static images and videos) were collected. As an initial step, we carried out a image reading exercise within the experts of the Pan-American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) US Study Group (n = 16). The following step consisted in a web-based exercise with the participation of larger number of sonographers (n = 63) from different centers. Images were rated evaluating the presence/absence of any US elementary lesion. Inter- and intra-reader reliabilities were analyzed using kappa coefficients. Participants were stratified according to their level of experience. In the first exercise, inter-reader kappa values were 0.45 for aggregates, 0.57 for tophus, 0.69 for erosions, and 0.90 for double contour (DC). Intra-reader kappa values were 0.86, 0.76, 0.80, and 0.90, respectively. The web-based exercise showed inter-reader kappa values for aggregates, tophus, erosions, and DC of 0.42, 0.49, 0.69, and 0.79, respectively. The intra-reader kappa values were 0.62, 0.69, 0.77, and 0.85, respectively. Reliability was not influenced by the sonographer’s level of experience. The reliability of the new OMERACT US definitions for elementary lesions in gout ranged from moderate to excellent, depending on the type of lesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wortmann RL (2002) Gout and hyperuricemia. Curr Opin Rheumatol 14:281–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eason A, House ME, Vincent Z et al (2016) Factors associated with change in radiographic damage scores in gout: a prospective observational study. Ann Rheum Dis 75:2075–2079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perez-Ruiz F, Martínez-Indart L, Carmona L et al (2014) Tophaceous gout and high level of hyperuricaemia are both associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with gout. Ann Rheum Dis 73:177–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pascual E, Sivera F, Andrés M (2011) Synovial fluid analysis for crystals. Curr Opin Rheumatol 23:161–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Swan A, Amer H, Dieppe P (2002) The value of synovial fluid assays in the diagnosis of joint disease: a literature survey. Ann Rheum Dis 61:493–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalbeth N, Stamp L (2014) Hyperuricaemia and gout: time for a new staging system? Ann Rheum Dis 73:1598–1600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruta S, Reginato AM, Pineda C, Gutierrez M, Pan-American League Against Rheumatisms (PANLAR) Ultrasound Study Group (2015) General applications of ultrasound in rheumatology: why we need it in our daily practice. J Clin Rheumatol 21:133–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N et al (2015) Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 74:1789–1798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee YH, Song GG (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in patients with gout: a meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 47:703–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mathieu S, Pereira B, Couderc M et al (2013) Usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gout: a meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 72:e23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gutierrez M, Schmidt WA, Thiele RG et al (2015) OMERACT Ultrasound Gout Task Force group. International consensus for ultrasound lesions in gout: results of Delphi process and web-reliability exercise. Rheumatology 54:1797–1805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Terslev L, Gutierrez M, Christensen R et al (2015) OMERACT US Gout Task Force. Assessing elementary lesions in gout by ultrasound: results of an OMERACT patient-based agreement and reliability exercise. J Rheumatol 42:2149–2154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Light RJ (1971) Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: some generalizations and alternatives. Psychol Bull 76:365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB (1993) Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 46:423–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chowalloor PV, Keen HI (2013) A systematic review of ultrasonography in gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Ann Rheum Dis 72:638–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Filippucci E, Riveros MG, Georgescu D et al (2009) Hyaline cartilage involvement in patients with gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. An ultrasound study. Osteoarthr Cartil 17:178–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Naredo E, Uson J, Jiménez-Palop M et al (2014) Ultrasound-detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout? Ann Rheum Dis 73:1522–1528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomas Cazenave.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Tomas Cazenave declares that he has no conflict of interest. Victoria Martire declares that she has no conflict of interest. Anthony M. Reginato declares that he has no conflict of interest. Marwin Gutierrez declares that he has no conflict of interest. Christian Alfredo Waimann declares that he has no conflict of interest. Carlos Pineda declares that he has no conflict of interest. Javier Eduardo Rosa declares that he has no conflict of interest. Santiago Ruta declares that he has no conflict of interest. Oscar Sedano-Santiago declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ana Maria Bertoli declares that she has no conflict of interest. Marcelo Audisio declares that he has no conflict of interest. Cristina Hernandez-Diaz declares that she has no conflict of interest. Lucio Ventura-Rios declares that he has no conflict of interest. Maritza Quintero declares that she has no conflict of interest. Eugenio De Miguel declares that he has no conflict of interest. Ana Laura Alvarez-del-Castillo-Araujo declares that she has no conflict of interest. Andy Abril declares that she has no conflict of interest. Eliana Natalí Ayala-Ledesma declares that she has no conflict of interest. Edith Alarcon-Isidro declares that she has no conflict of interest. Maria Lida Santiago declares that she has no conflict of interest. Mariana Alejandra Pera declares that she has no conflict of interest. Cecilia Urquiola declares that she has no conflict of interest. Gustavo Rodriguez Gil declares that he has no conflict of interest. Lina Maria Saldarriaga Rivera declares that she has no conflict of interest. Cesar Cefferino declares that he has no conflict of interest. Mariana Benegas declares that she has no conflict of interest. Mario Enrique Diaz Cortes declares that he has no conflict of interest. Maximiliano Bravo declares that he has no conflict of interest. Diana Peiteado declares that she has no conflict of interest. Natalia Anahi Estrella declares that she has no conflict of interest. Roser Areny Micas declares that she has no conflict of interest. Jorge Saavedra Muñoz declares that he has no conflict of interest. Rodolfo del Carmen Arape Toyo declares that he has no conflict of interest. Maria Soledad Gálvez Elkin declares that she has no conflict of interest. Walter Javier Spindler declares that he has no conflict of interest. Clarisa Sandobal declares that she has no conflict of interest. Josefina Marin declares that she has no conflict of interest. Manuella Lima Gomes Ochtrop declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ricardo Pavao Ayala declares that he has no conflict of interest. Erika Roxana Catay declares that she has no conflict of interest. Guillermo Enrique Py declares that he has no conflict of interest. Gabriel Hector Aguilar declares that he has no conflict of interest. Yvonne Yona Rengel Colina declares that she has no conflict of interest. Carla Antonela Airoldi declares that she has no conflict of interest. Claudia Selene Mora-Trujillo declares that she has no conflict of interest. Maria Paula Kohan declares that she has no conflict of interest. Lorena Evelin Urioste Eguez declares that she has no conflict of interest. Concepción Castillo-Gallego declares that she has no conflict of interest. Jose Francisco Diaz-Coto declares that he has no conflict of interest. Patricio Tate declares that he has no conflict of interest. Carla Magali Saucedo declares that she has no conflict of interest. Oscar Vega-Hinojosa declares that he has no conflict of interest. Cristian Jonatan Troitiño declares that he has no conflict of interest. Maria Florencia Marengo declares that she has no conflict of interest. Priscila Maria Marcaida declares that she has no conflict of interest. Irene Monjo Henry declares that she has no conflict of interest. Roberto Muñoz-Louis declares that he has no conflict of interest. Carla Solano declares that she has no conflict of interest. Felix Reinaldo Fernandez Castillo declares that he has no conflict of interest. Cesar Enrique Graf declares that he has no conflict of interest. Mara Guinsburg declares that she has no conflict of interest. Maria Julia Santa Cruz declares that she has no conflict of interest. David Alejandro Navarta Ortiz declares that he has no conflict of interest. Magaly Alva Linares declares that she has no conflict of interest. Marcos Gabriel Rosemffet declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Research involving human and/or animal participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cazenave, T., Martire, V., Reginato, A.M. et al. Reliability of OMERACT ultrasound elementary lesions in gout: results from a multicenter exercise. Rheumatol Int 39, 707–713 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4220-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4220-0

Keywords

Navigation