Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Absence of cardiotoxicity with prolonged treatment and large accumulating doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is used as a second-line therapy for gynecologic cancers, with a better short-term toxicity profile compared to doxorubicin or other anthracyclines.

Methods

We screened 14 patients with recurrent gynecologic cancers, who underwent prolonged treatment with large cumulative doses of PLD for overt or subtle signs of cardiotoxicity (CTX) using standard and advanced echocardiography techniques [3D volumetric method for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular/right ventricular global longitudinal strain]. Half the patients had previous echocardiographic studies available for comparison.

Results

The average PLD treatment duration was 23.6 ± 10.8 months (range 13–57), accumulating dose of 1387 ± 483 mg (range 780–2538 mg). The study group had a normal LVEF both by 2D-echo (60 ± 5%, range 50–67) and 3D echo (58 ± 5%, range 46–63). Two patients (14%) were found to have minimally reduced ejection fraction by 2D and 3D echo (50%/46% and 51%/49%, respectively) that did not meet the current definition of CTX. For the seven patients who had consecutive echocardiography studies, the average LVEF remained stable between studies (59 ± 7, 60 ± 9 and 58 ± 10.5% for the latest study, previous, p < 0.79, and most remote study p < 0.9); No change was found in average left ventricular/right ventricular global longitudinal strain as well: −20.8 ± 4.6% at the latest study and −19.3 ± 2.6% for the previous (p < 0.51).

Conclusion

No prevalent or incident cases of cardiotoxicity were found despite prolonged treatment with large cumulative doses of PLD, adding to previous reports on shorter treatment duration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gianni L, Herman EH, Lipshultz SE, Minotti G, Sarvazyan N, Sawyer DB (2008) Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: from bench to bedside. J Clin Oncol 26(22):3777–3784

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz RG, Jain D, Storozynsky E (2013) Traditional and novel methods to assess and prevent chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction noninvasively. J Nucl Cardiol 20(3):443–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lefrak EA, Pitha J, Rosenheim S, Gottlieb JA (1973) A clinicopathologic analysis of adriamycin cardiotoxicity. Cancer 32(2):302–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheppard RJ, Berger J, Sebag IA (2013) Cardiotoxicity of cancer therapeutics: current issues in screening, prevention, and therapy. Front Pharmacol 4:19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Von Hoff DD, Layard MW, Basa P, Davis HL Jr, Von Hoff AL, Rozencweig M, Muggia FM (1979) Risk factors for doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure. Ann Intern Med 91(5):710–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colombo A, Cipolla C, Beggiato M, Cardinale D (2013) Cardiac toxicity of anticancer agents. Curr Cardiol Rep 15(5):362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabizon A, Shmeeda H, Grenader T (2012) Pharmacological basis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: impact on cancer therapy. Eur J Pharm Sci 45(4):388–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Staropoli N, Ciliberto D, Botta C, Fiorillo L, Grimaldi A, Lama S, Caraglia M, Salvino A, Tassone P, Tagliaferri P (2014) Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the management of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials. Cancer Biol Ther 15(6):707–720

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawrie TA, Bryant A, Cameron A, Gray E, Morrison J (2013) Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD006910

    Google Scholar 

  10. Safra T, Muggia F, Jeffers S, Tsao-Wei DD, Groshen S, Lyass O, Henderson R, Berry G, Gabizon A (2000) Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil): reduced clinical cardiotoxicity in patients reaching or exceeding cumulative doses of 500 mg/m2. Ann Oncol 11(8):1029–1033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Orditura M, Quaglia F, Morgillo F, Martinelli E, Lieto E, De Rosa G, Comunale D, Diadema MR, Ciardiello F, Catalano G et al (2004) Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: pharmacologic and clinical evidence of potent antitumor activity with reduced anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (review). Oncol Rep 12(3):549–556

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Plana JC, Galderisi M, Barac A, Ewer MS, Ky B, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Ganame J, Sebag IA, Agler DA, Badano LP et al (2014) Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27(9):911–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(3):233–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gill SE, Savage K, Wysham WZ, Blackhurst DW, Winter WE, Puls LE (2013) Continuing routine cardiac surveillance in long-term use of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: is it necessary? Gynecol Oncol 129(3):544–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yildirim Y, Gultekin E, Avci ME, Inal MM, Yunus S, Tinar S (2008) Cardiac safety profile of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin reaching or exceeding lifetime cumulative doses of 550 mg/m2 in patients with recurrent ovarian and peritoneal cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18(2):223–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Senior R, Becher H, Monaghan M, Agati L, Zamorano J, Vanoverschelde JL, Nihoyannopoulos P (2009) Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 10(2):194–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, Adams DH, Agricola E, Buck T, Faletra FF, Franke A, Hung J, de Isla LP et al (2012) EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(1):3–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Feigenbaum H, Mastouri R, Sawada S (2012) A practical approach to using strain echocardiography to evaluate the left ventricle. Circ J 76(7):1550–1555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. D’Hooge J, Heimdal A, Jamal F, Kukulski T, Bijnens B, Rademakers F, Hatle L, Suetens P, Sutherland GR (2000) Regional strain and strain rate measurements by cardiac ultrasound: principles, implementation and limitations. Eur J Echocardiogr 1(3):154–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sawaya H, Sebag IA, Plana JC, Januzzi JL, Ky B, Cohen V, Gosavi S, Carver JR, Wiegers SE, Martin RP et al (2011) Early detection and prediction of cardiotoxicity in chemotherapy-treated patients. Am J Cardiol 107(9):1375–1380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gorcsan J 3rd, Tanaka H (2011) Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial strain. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(14):1401–1413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hedhli N, Russell KS (2011) Cardiotoxicity of molecularly targeted agents. Curr Cardiol Rev 7(4):221–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was made possible in part by Grants from the Montreal-Israel Cancer Research Foundation, the Gloria Shapiro fund, the Hospital Foundation, and the Levy Family Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter H. Gotlieb.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blank, N., Laskov, I., Kessous, R. et al. Absence of cardiotoxicity with prolonged treatment and large accumulating doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80, 737–743 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3412-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3412-8

Keywords

Navigation