Skip to main content
Log in

Correlations of the rectus abdominis muscle anatomy with anthropometric measurements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The anterior abdominal muscle wall has a strong aesthetic connotation, primarily because of the classical anatomical description of the rectus abdominis muscle in the collective consciousness. However, the morphological reality of the general population considerably deviates from this description. Therefore, we investigated the anthropometric characteristics correlated with the anatomy of the rectus abdominis muscle.

Methods

We performed a computed tomography scan anatomical study of recti abdominis muscles in 86 patients with no history of abdominal surgery. We noted the transverse and anteroposterior measurements of the rectus abdominis muscle, the transverse measurement of the linea alba, and the cutaneous and muscular abdominal perimeters. We compared these morphological elements with anthropometric data (sex, age, weight, height, and body mass index [BMI]).

Results

BMI was positively correlated with cutaneous abdominal perimeter (r = 0.89, p < 0.001) and muscular abdominal perimeter (r = 0.7, p < 0.001). The correlation of BMI with cutaneous abdominal perimeter was not influenced by sex (r = 0.90 and r = 0.89 in men and women, respectively). The correlation of BMI with muscular abdominal perimeter was greater in men than in women (r = 0.80 vs. r = 0.75). The muscular abdominal perimeter was more strongly correlated with the transverse measurement of the rectus abdominis muscle in men than in women (r = 0.75 vs. r = 0.59). The muscular abdominal perimeter was more strongly correlated with the linea alba in women than in men (r = 0.51 vs. r = 0.31).

Conclusion

The anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall correlated with anthropometric data, including BMI. Rectus abdominis muscles and linea alba structures differed between men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beer GM, Schuster A, Seifert B, Manestar M, Mihic-Probst D, Weber SA (2009) The normal width of the linea alba in nulliparous women. Clin Anat 22:706–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Danilla S (2017) Rectus Abdominis Fat Transfer (RAFT) in lipoabdominoplasty: a new technique to achieve fitness body contour in patients that require tummy tuck. Aesthet Plast Surg 41:1389–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0909-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eisner BH, Zargooshi J, Berger AD, Cooperberg MR, Doyle SM, Sheth S, Stoller ML (2010) Gender differences in subcutaneous and perirenal fat distribution. Surg Radiol Anat 32:879–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0692-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jenkins TP (1976) The burst abdominal wound: a mechanical approach. Br J Surg 63:873–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800631110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jourdan A, Soucasse A, Scemama U, Gillion JF, Chaumoitre K, Masson C, Bege T, For “Club Hernie” (2019) Abdominal wall morphometric variability based on computed tomography: Influence of age, gender, and body mass index. Clin Anat. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim J, Lim H, Lee SI, Kim YJ (2012) Thickness of rectus abdominis muscle and abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue in adult women: correlation with age, pregnancy, laparotomy, and body mass index. Arch Plast Surg 39:528–533. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.5.528

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mota P, Pascoal AG, Carita AI, Bø K (2018) Normal width of the inter-recti distance in pregnant and postpartum primiparous women. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 35:34–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2018.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham DJ (2006) Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 34:320–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rath AM, Attali P, Dumas JL, Goldlust D, Zhang J, Chevrel JP (1996) The abdominal linea alba: an anatomo-radiologic and biomechanical study. Surg Radiol Anat 18:281–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01627606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, Gallagher D, St-Onge M-P, Albu J, Heymsfield SB, Heshka S (2004) Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J Appl Physiol 97:2333–2338. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00744.2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stecco C, Azzena GP, Macchi V, Porzionato A, Behr A, Rambaldo A, Tiengo C, De Caro R (2018) Rectus abdominis muscle innervation: an anatomical study with surgical implications in diep flap harvesting. Surg Radiol Anat 40:865–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1944-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tahan N, Khademi-Kalantari K, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Mikaili S, Baghban AA, Jaberzadeh S (2016) Measurement of superficial and deep abdominal muscle thickness: an ultrasonography study. J Physiol Anthropol 35:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-016-0106-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanaka NI, Yamada M, Tanaka Y, Fukunaga T, Nishijima T, Kanehisa H (2007) Difference in abdominal muscularity at the umbilicus level between young and middle-aged men. J Physiol Anthropol 26:527–532. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.26.527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Valentin S, Licka T, Elliott J (2015) Age and side-related morphometric MRI evaluation of trunk muscles in people without back pain. Man Ther 20:90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2014.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Walming S, Angenete E, Block M, Bock D, Gessler B, Haglind E (2017) Retrospective review of risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. BMC Surg 17:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0207-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Prof. Jacques Monteil and the Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Limoges, France, for allowing us to access the 18-FDG TEP/CT imaging.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FF and SD-F developed the protocol/project. FF, MG, and EV-V collected the data. FF and AT participated in data analysis. All authors participated in writing, editing, and approval of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabien Fredon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fredon, F., Hardy, J., Germain, M. et al. Correlations of the rectus abdominis muscle anatomy with anthropometric measurements. Surg Radiol Anat 43, 589–593 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02655-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02655-9

Keywords

Navigation