Abstract
Purpose
The anterior abdominal muscle wall has a strong aesthetic connotation, primarily because of the classical anatomical description of the rectus abdominis muscle in the collective consciousness. However, the morphological reality of the general population considerably deviates from this description. Therefore, we investigated the anthropometric characteristics correlated with the anatomy of the rectus abdominis muscle.
Methods
We performed a computed tomography scan anatomical study of recti abdominis muscles in 86 patients with no history of abdominal surgery. We noted the transverse and anteroposterior measurements of the rectus abdominis muscle, the transverse measurement of the linea alba, and the cutaneous and muscular abdominal perimeters. We compared these morphological elements with anthropometric data (sex, age, weight, height, and body mass index [BMI]).
Results
BMI was positively correlated with cutaneous abdominal perimeter (r = 0.89, p < 0.001) and muscular abdominal perimeter (r = 0.7, p < 0.001). The correlation of BMI with cutaneous abdominal perimeter was not influenced by sex (r = 0.90 and r = 0.89 in men and women, respectively). The correlation of BMI with muscular abdominal perimeter was greater in men than in women (r = 0.80 vs. r = 0.75). The muscular abdominal perimeter was more strongly correlated with the transverse measurement of the rectus abdominis muscle in men than in women (r = 0.75 vs. r = 0.59). The muscular abdominal perimeter was more strongly correlated with the linea alba in women than in men (r = 0.51 vs. r = 0.31).
Conclusion
The anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall correlated with anthropometric data, including BMI. Rectus abdominis muscles and linea alba structures differed between men and women.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beer GM, Schuster A, Seifert B, Manestar M, Mihic-Probst D, Weber SA (2009) The normal width of the linea alba in nulliparous women. Clin Anat 22:706–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20836
Danilla S (2017) Rectus Abdominis Fat Transfer (RAFT) in lipoabdominoplasty: a new technique to achieve fitness body contour in patients that require tummy tuck. Aesthet Plast Surg 41:1389–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0909-9
Eisner BH, Zargooshi J, Berger AD, Cooperberg MR, Doyle SM, Sheth S, Stoller ML (2010) Gender differences in subcutaneous and perirenal fat distribution. Surg Radiol Anat 32:879–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0692-7
Jenkins TP (1976) The burst abdominal wound: a mechanical approach. Br J Surg 63:873–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800631110
Jourdan A, Soucasse A, Scemama U, Gillion JF, Chaumoitre K, Masson C, Bege T, For “Club Hernie” (2019) Abdominal wall morphometric variability based on computed tomography: Influence of age, gender, and body mass index. Clin Anat. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23548
Kim J, Lim H, Lee SI, Kim YJ (2012) Thickness of rectus abdominis muscle and abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue in adult women: correlation with age, pregnancy, laparotomy, and body mass index. Arch Plast Surg 39:528–533. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.5.528
Mota P, Pascoal AG, Carita AI, Bø K (2018) Normal width of the inter-recti distance in pregnant and postpartum primiparous women. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 35:34–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2018.02.004
Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham DJ (2006) Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 34:320–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20589
Rath AM, Attali P, Dumas JL, Goldlust D, Zhang J, Chevrel JP (1996) The abdominal linea alba: an anatomo-radiologic and biomechanical study. Surg Radiol Anat 18:281–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01627606
Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, Gallagher D, St-Onge M-P, Albu J, Heymsfield SB, Heshka S (2004) Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image. J Appl Physiol 97:2333–2338. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00744.2004
Stecco C, Azzena GP, Macchi V, Porzionato A, Behr A, Rambaldo A, Tiengo C, De Caro R (2018) Rectus abdominis muscle innervation: an anatomical study with surgical implications in diep flap harvesting. Surg Radiol Anat 40:865–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1944-6
Tahan N, Khademi-Kalantari K, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Mikaili S, Baghban AA, Jaberzadeh S (2016) Measurement of superficial and deep abdominal muscle thickness: an ultrasonography study. J Physiol Anthropol 35:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-016-0106-6
Tanaka NI, Yamada M, Tanaka Y, Fukunaga T, Nishijima T, Kanehisa H (2007) Difference in abdominal muscularity at the umbilicus level between young and middle-aged men. J Physiol Anthropol 26:527–532. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.26.527
Valentin S, Licka T, Elliott J (2015) Age and side-related morphometric MRI evaluation of trunk muscles in people without back pain. Man Ther 20:90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2014.07.007
Walming S, Angenete E, Block M, Bock D, Gessler B, Haglind E (2017) Retrospective review of risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. BMC Surg 17:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0207-0
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Prof. Jacques Monteil and the Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Limoges, France, for allowing us to access the 18-FDG TEP/CT imaging.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FF and SD-F developed the protocol/project. FF, MG, and EV-V collected the data. FF and AT participated in data analysis. All authors participated in writing, editing, and approval of the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fredon, F., Hardy, J., Germain, M. et al. Correlations of the rectus abdominis muscle anatomy with anthropometric measurements. Surg Radiol Anat 43, 589–593 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02655-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02655-9