Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomic variability of oval window as pertaining to stapes surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to study the details of dimensions and shape of oval window in different age groups, sides and genders and their clinical implications. The oval window is a key structure while performing surgeries in relation to stapes. An intricate knowledge of the shape and size of the oval window is important for the reconstruction and fitting of cartilage compatible with the native shape of the oval window.

Methods

Sixty normal wet cadaveric temporal bones of known age; gender and side were micro-dissected. The maximum height and width of the oval window was measured. The shape of the oval window was noticed.

Results

The mean value for maximum height and width of the oval window was 1.31 ± 0.28 mm and 2.67 ± 0.42 mm, respectively. The height and width of the oval window ranged between 1 mm and 1.5 mm and 2 mm and 3 mm in majority of the cases.  he oval window was found to be oval shaped in 53.3% cases, other shapes such as kidney, D shape, rectangular or trapezoidal were also observed.

Conclusions

The refined morphometric information of the oval window will help in preoperative assessment and surgical planning of various oval window-related surgical procedures. The knowledge may also help in designing and selecting proper cartilage shoe for the best outcome. Narrow oval window may cause procedural complications and surgeon discomfort in various stapes surgeries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayache D, Sleiman J, Tchuente AN et al (1999) Variations and incidents encountered during stapes surgery for otosclerosis. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 116:8–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beutner D, Luers JC, Huttenbrink KB (2008) Cartilage ‘shoe’: a new technique for stabilisation of titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis at centre of stapes footplate. J Laryngol Otol 122:682–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Booth TN, Vezina LG, Karcher G et al (2000) Imaging and clinical evaluation of isolated atresia of the oval window. Am J Neuroradiol 21:171–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Alarcon A, Jahrsdoerfer RA, Kesser BW (2008) Congenital absence of the oval window: diagnosis, surgery, and audiometric outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eysell A (1870) Beitrage zur Anatomie des Steigbugels und Seiner Verbindungen. Arch Ohrenheilkund 5:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hendri Tono SH, Salim J et al (2008) The changes of soft tissue profile in skeletal class II patients with mandibular retrognathy treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars. Padjadjaran J Dent 20:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Inserra MM, Mason TP, Yoon PJ et al (2004) Partial promontory technique in stapedotomy cases with narrow niche. Otol Neurotol 25:443–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jahrsdoerfer RA (1988) Embryology of the facial nerve. Am J Otol 9:423–426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapur TR (1991) The deep oval window. J Laryngol Otol 105:721–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lippy WH, Battista RA, Berenholz L et al (2003) Twenty-year review of revision stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 24:560–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mancheño M M, Aristegui M, Sañudo JR (2017) Round and oval window anatomic variability: its implications for the vibroplasty technique. Otol Neurotol 38:e50–e57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mansour S, Magnan J, Haidar H et al (2013) Comprehensive and clinical anatomy of the middle ear. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Maroonroge S, Emanuel D, Letowski T (2009) Basic anatomy of the hearing system. In: Rash CE, Russo MB, Letowski T, Schmisser E (eds) Helmet-mounted displays: sensation, perception and cognition issues. USAARL, Alabama, pp 279–306

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mayer TE, Brueckmann H, Siegert R et al (1997) High resolution CT of temporal bone in dysplasia of the auricle and the external auditory canal. Am J Neuroradiol 18:53–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parra C, Trunet S, Granger B et al (2017) Imaging criteria to predict surgical difficulties during stapes surgery. Otol Neurotol 38:815–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rusiecka M, Bernal-Sprekelsen M (2014) Footplate reconstruction: preliminary results. Otol Neurotol 35:1797–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sahni D, Singla A, Gupta A et al (2015) Relationship of cochlea with surrounding neurovascular structures and their implication in cochlear implantation. Surg Radiol Anat 37:913–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwa B, Salcher RB, Maier H, Kontorinis G (2012) Oval window membrane vibroplasty for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation: treating severe mixed hearing loss in challenging middle ears. Otol Neurotol 33:804–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sim JH, Roosli C, Chatzimichalis M et al (2013) Characterization of stapes anatomy: investigation of human and guinea pig. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 14:159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Singla A, Gupta T, Sahni D et al (2017) Topography of neurovascular structures in relation to round window and how it relates to cochlear implantation. Surg Radiol Anat 39:1309–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singla A, Sahni D, Gupta AK et al (2014) Surgical anatomy of round window and its implications for cochlear implantation. Clin Anat 27:331–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Singla A, Gupta T, Gupta AK et al (2014) Impingement of the carotid canal on the basal turn of the cochlea as pertaining to cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 35:1746–1751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singla A, Sahni D, Gupta AK et al (2014) Surgical anatomy of the basal turn of the human cochlea as pertaining to cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 36:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sircoglou J, Gehrke M, Tardivel M et al (2015) Trans-oval-window implants, a new approach for drug delivery to the inner ear: extended dexamethasone release from silicone-based implants. Otol Neurotol 36:1572–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Standring S (2008) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 40th edn. Churchill-Livingston, New York, pp 624–625

    Google Scholar 

  26. Swartz JD, Glazer AV, Faeber EN et al (1986) Congenital middle ear deafness—CT study. Radiology 159:187–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ukkola-Pons E, Ayache D, Pons Y et al (2013) Oval window niche height: quantitative evaluation with CT before stapes surgery for otosclerosis. Am J Neuroradiol 34:1082–1085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weissman JL (1996) Hearing loss. Radiology 199:593–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zdilla YJ, Skrzat J, Kozerska M et al (2018) Oval window size and shape: a micro-CT anatomical study with considerations for stapes surgery. Otol Neurotol 39:558–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zeifer B, Sabini P, Sonne J (2000) Congenital absence of the oval window: radiologic diagnosis and associated anomalies. Am J Neuroradiol 21:322–327

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Mr. Vijay Kant Bakshi and Mr Pradeep for skillful photography and Mr. Puneet Singal for his help in data analysis. The authors are thankful to the family members for donation of the cadavers. May their soul rest in peace. The study was supported by a Grant from the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India (Grant No. 51/2/2011-BMS).

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India (Grant No. 51/2/2011-BMS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS: project development, data collection, manuscript writing. DS: project development, data analysis. TG: data analysis, manuscript writing. AA: project development, manuscript editing. AKG: project development.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tulika Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singal, A., Sahni, D., Gupta, T. et al. Anatomic variability of oval window as pertaining to stapes surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 42, 329–335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02347-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02347-z

Keywords

Navigation