Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa: an innovative metrical assessment based on 3D segmentation on head CT-scan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The pterygopalatine fossa is an important anatomical structure for several surgical and anaesthesiologic procedures; yet, very few data are available about its size. This study aims at providing a metrical assessment of pterygopalatine fossa through an innovative 3D segmentation procedure on head CT-scans.

Methods

CT-scans from 100 patients (50 males and 50 females) aged between 18 and 85 years were chosen for the study. Right and left pterygopalatine fossae were segmented through ITK-SNAP open source software. Height and volume were calculated on the acquired 3D models. In addition, anterior–posterior nasal spine distance, upper facial height (nasion–prosthion) and biorbital breadth (ectoconchion–ectoconchion) were measured as well. Statistically significant differences of height and volume according to sex and side were assessed through two-way ANOVA test: sexually dimorphic measurements were further assessed through one-way ANCOVA test using the three cranial measurements as covariates (p < 0.05).

Results

On average pterygopalatine fossa height was 24.1 ± 3.5 mm in males, and 22.8 ± 3.4 mm in females, whereas volume was 0.930 ± 0.181 cm3 in males and 0.817 ± 0.157 cm3 in females, with statistically significant differences according to sex (p < 0.05), but not to side (p > 0.05); interaction was negligible for both the measurements. ANCOVA test verified that sexual dimorphism of both measurements is independent from general cranial size (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The present study highlighted the sexual dimorphism of pterygopalatine fossa: results may improve the knowledge of this anatomical structure difficult to explore, but crucial in several fields of clinics and surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roberti F, Boari N, Mortini P, Caputy AJ (2007) The pterygopalatine fossa: an anatomic report. J Craniofac Surg 18:586–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tashi S, Purohit BS, Becker M, Mundada P (2016) The pterygopalatine fossa: imaging anatomy, communications, and pathology revisited. Insights Imaging 7:589–599

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen GD (1984) Dental anaesthesia and analgesia (local and general). Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cavallo LM, Messina A, Gardner P, Esposito F, Kassam AB, Cappabianca P, de Divitiis E, Tschabitscher M (2005) Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the pterygopalatine fossa: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 19:E5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alvernia JE, Spomar DG, Olivero WC (2007) A computed tomography scan and anatomical cadaveric study of the pterygopalatine ganglion for use in Gamma Knife treatment of cluster headache. J Neurosurg 107:805–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sareen D, Agarwal AK, Kaul JM, Sethi A (2005) Study of sphenoid sinus anatomy in relation to endoscopic surgery. Int J Morphol 23:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stajcic Z, Todorovic LJ (1997) Blocks of the foramen rotundum and the oval foramen: a reappraisal of extra oral maxillary and mandibular nerve injections. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:328–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stojcev Stajcic L, Gacic B, Popovic N, Stajcic Z (2010) Anatomical study of the pterygopalatine fossa pertinent to the maxillary nerve block at the foramen rotundum. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:493–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rusu MC, Didilescu AC, Jianu AM, Paduraru D (2013) 3D CBCT anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa. Surg Radiol Anat 35:143–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Erdogan N, Unur E, Baykara M (2003) CT anatomy of pterygopalatine fossa and its communications: a pictorial review. Comput Med Imaging Graph 27:481–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams PL, Gray H, Bannister LH (1999) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  12. Codari M, Zago M, Guidugli GA, Pucciarelli V, Tartaglia GM, Ottaviani F, Righini S, Sforza C (2016) The nasal septum deviation index (NSDI) based on CBCT data. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 45:20150327

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31:1116–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang SH, Seo JH, Joo YH, Kim BG, Cho JH, Kang JM (2011) An anatomic study using three-dimensional reconstruction for pterygopalatine fossa infiltration via the greater palatine canal. Clin Anat 24:576–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu MC, Yin XR, Zhang YS, Yang W, Zhang HW, Duan HB, Liu JM, Cheng KL, Li YQ (2017) Computed tomography research: relative anatomy of Caldwell–Luc approach in pterygopalatine fossa surgery. J Craniofac Surg 28:1537–1540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elhadi AM, Almefty KK, Mendes GA, Kalani MY, Kalani MY, Nakaji P, Dru A, Preul MC, Little AS (2014) Comparison of surgical freedom and area of exposure in three endoscopic transmaxillary approaches to the anterolateral cranial base. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 75:346–353

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Craiu C, Rusu MC, Hostiuc S, Sandulescu M, Derjac-Arama AI (2017) Anatomic variation in the pterygopalatine angle of the maxillary sinus and the maxillary bulla. Anat Sci Int 92:98–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pinheiro-Neto CD, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Rivera-Serrano CM, Paluzzi A, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Sennes LU (2012) Endoscopic anatomy of the palatovaginal canal (palatosphenoidal canal): a landmark for dissection of the vidian nerve during endonasal transpterygoid approaches. Laryngoscope 122:6–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sluder G (1913) Etiology, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of sphenopalatine ganglion neuralgia. JAMA 61:1201–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bannon R, Parihar S, Skarparis Y, Varsou O, Cezayirli E (2018) 3D printing the pterygopalatine fossa: a negative space model of a complex structure. Surg Radiol Anat 40:185–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Derinkuyu BE, Boyunaga O, Oztunali C, Alimli AG, Ucar M (2017) Pterygopalatine fossa: not a mystery! Can Assoc Radiol J 68:122–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wormald PJ, Athanasiadis T, Rees G, Robinson S (2005) An evaluation of effect of pterygopalatine fossa injection with local anesthetic and adrenalin in the control of nasal bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 19:288–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nique TA, Bennett RC (1981) Inadvertent brainstem anaesthesia following extra oral trigeminal V2–V3 blocks. Oral Surg 51:468–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gallardo CAC, Galdames ICS, Lopez MGC, Matamala DAZ (2008) Relationship between pterygopalatine fossa volume and cephalic and upper facial indexes. Int J Morphol 26:393–396

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms. Annalisa Gadler for data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DG: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, manuscript editing. MC: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, manuscript editing. SG: project development, data collection, manuscript editing. AC: data analysis, manuscript writing, manuscript editing. MMP: data analysis, manuscript editing. AGO: data collection, manuscript editing. GT: data collection, manuscript editing. CD: data analysis, manuscript editing. CS: project development, data analysis, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Gibelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gibelli, D., Cellina, M., Gibelli, S. et al. Anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa: an innovative metrical assessment based on 3D segmentation on head CT-scan. Surg Radiol Anat 41, 523–528 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2153-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2153-7

Keywords

Navigation