Abstract
Purpose
To describe the applied anatomy of a minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach used to reach the posterior aspect of the C1–C2 complex.
Summary of background data
Atlantoaxial fusion using a midline posterior approach and polyaxial screw and rod system is widely used. Although minimally invasive variations of this technique have been recently reported, the complex applied anatomy of these approaches has not been described. The C1–C2 complex represents an unique challenge because of its bony and vascular anatomy. In this study, the applied anatomy and feasibility of this technique are examined on cadavers.
Methods
The microsurgical anatomy of the upper cervical spine is examined on a formalin-fixed and on a fresh cadaver. The muscle-splitting approach is performed on 12 fresh cadavers using this technique.
Results
The minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach is described in detail. Relevant anatomy and bony landmarks that aid screw placement in C1 and C2 could be well visualized. Using this approach, we were able to reach the lateral mass of the atlas and the inferior articular process and pars interarticularis of the axis in all of the nine cadavers. We placed mini polyaxial screws in C1 lateral mass and C2 pars interarticularis in four cadavers according to the technique described by Harms and Melcher.
Conclusions
Using this approach, it was possible to reach the posterior aspect of C1 and C2; the relevant anatomy needed to perform a C1–C2 fusion could be well visualized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brooks AL, Jenkins EB (1978) Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge compression method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(3):279–284
Coyne TJ, Fehlings MG, Wallace MC, Bernstein M, Tator CH (1995) C1-C2 posterior cervical fusion: long-term evaluation of results and efficacy. Neurosurgery 37(4):688–692 (Discussion 692–3)
Gallie WE (1939) Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Am J Surg 46:495–499
Gejo R, Kawaguchi Y, Kondoh T et al (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats. Spine 25(8):941–946
Goel A, Laheri V (1994) Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 129(1–2):47–53
Gray H, Davies DV, Davies F, Johnston TB (1958) Gray’s anatomy, 32nd edn. Longmans Green and Co., New York, pp 579–582
Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) A minimally invasive technique for decompression of the lumbar spine. Spine 27(4):432–438
Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 26(22):2467–2471
Holly LT, Isaacs RE, Frempong-Boadu AK (2010) Minimally invasive atlantoaxial fusion. Neurosurgery 66(Supplement):A193–A197
Iizuka H, Shimizu T, Tateno K et al (2001) Extensor musculature of the cervical spine after laminoplasty: morphologic evaluation by coronal view of the magnetic resonance image. Spine 26(20):2220–2226
Joseffer SS, Post N, Cooper PR, Frempong-Boadu AK (2006) Minimally invasive atlantoaxial fixation with a polyaxial screw-rod construct: technical case report. Neurosurgery 58(Supplement 2):ONS–E375
Magerl F, Seeman PS (1987) Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation. In: Kehr P, Weidner A (eds) Cervical spine I. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 322–327
Melcher RP, Puttlitz CM, Kleinstueck FS, Lotz JC, Harms J, Bradford DS (2002) Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques. Spine 27:2435–2440
Mixter SJ, Osgood RB (1910) Traumatic lesions of the atlas and axis. Ann Surg 51(2):193–207
O’Toole J, Voyadzis JM, Gala VC (2011) Posterior minimally invasive cervical foraminotomy and laminectomy. In: Sandhu FA, Voyadzis JM, Fessler RG (eds) Decision making for minimally invasive spine surgery. Thieme, New York
Pernkopf E (1952) Topographische Anatomie des Menschen. III. Band Der, Hals. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Germany, pp 63–67
Rickenbacher J, Landolt AM, Theiler K (1982) Lanz/Wachsmuth Praktische Anatomie Rücken. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 78–98
Santiago P, Fessler RG (2007) Minimally invasive surgery for the management of cervical spondylosis. Neurosurgery 60:S160–S165
Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, Nakamura M, Ikegami T (2003) Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Spine 28(24):2667–2672
Shiraishi T, Kato M, Yato Y et al (2012) New techniques for exposure of posterior cervical spine through intermuscular planes and their surgical application. Spine 37(5):E286–E296
Taghva A, Attenello FJ, Zada G, Khalessi AA, Hsieh PC (2012) Minimally invasive posterior atlantoaxial fusion: a cadaveric and clinical feasibility study. World Neurosurg. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.01.054
Takeshita K, Peterson ETK, Bylski-Austrow D, Crawford AH, Nakamura K (2004) The nuchal ligament restrains cervical spine flexion. Spine 29(18):E388–E393
Wang MY, Levi ADO (2006) Minimally invasive lateral mass screw fixation in the cervical spine: initial clinical experience with long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 58(5):907–912 (Discussion 907–12)
Yamaguchi S, Eguchi K, Kiura Y, Takeda M, Kurisu K (2008) Posterolateral protrusion of the vertebral artery over the posterior arch of the atlas: quantitative anatomical study using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. J Neurosurg Spine 9(2):167–174
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bodon, G., Patonay, L., Baksa, G. et al. Applied anatomy of a minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach to posterior C1–C2 fusion: an anatomical feasibility study. Surg Radiol Anat 36, 1063–1069 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1274-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1274-x