Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CT-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy in Patients with Suspected Retroperitoneal Fibrosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Non-Vascular Interventions
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The outcome of CT-guided biopsy in patients with suspected retroperitoneal fibrosis (RF), regarded as technically challenging, remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the results of CT-guided biopsy in patients with lesions considered in the differential diagnosis of RF and compare them with results from patients with other retroperitoneal lesions.

Materials and Methods

Patients who underwent CT-guided biopsy of retroperitoneal lesions between January 2010 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The study cohort with retroperitoneal lesions surrounding the infra-abdominal aorta, iliac vessels, and/or ureters was divided into two groups: Group F included patients with lesions for which RF was considered in the differential diagnosis, and Group C comprised patients with a retroperitoneal mass or lymphadenopathy. Lesion size and depth, and biopsy details including technical success, position, procedure time, diagnostic yield, and complications between the two groups were compared.

Results

Group F included 27 patients (mean age 68.5 years ± 11.6, 17 male) and Group C 30 patients (mean age 65.0 years ± 11.8, 16 male). The short axis was significantly smaller in Group F than in Group C (19 mm vs 26 mm, P = 0.041), and procedure time was significantly longer in Group F than in Group C (31.5 min ± 13.2 vs 20.3 min ± 8.4, P = 0.001). Technical success rate (93% vs 100%), accuracy (93% vs 93%), and complications (3.7% vs 10%) between Groups F and C were not significantly different.

Conclusions

CT-guided biopsy of patients with suspected RF is considered safe and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

IgG:

Immunoglobulin

PNB:

Percutaneous needle biopsy

RF:

Retroperitoneal fibrosis

References

  1. Vaglio A, Salvarani C, Buzio C. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. Lancet. 2006;367(9506):241–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Forestier A, Buob D, Mirault T, et al. No specific imaging pattern can help differentiate IgG4-related disease from idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: 18 histologically proven cases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36(3):371–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vaglio A, Maritati F. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(7):1880–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kermani TA, Crowson CS, Achenbach SJ, Luthra HS. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a retrospective review of clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(4):297–303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nozaki T, Iida H, Morii A, Fujiuchi Y, Komiya A, Fuse H. Efficacy of laparoendoscopic single-site biopsy for diagnosis of retroperitoneal tumor of unknown origin. Urol Int. 2013;90(1):95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheel PJ Jr, Feeley N. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2013;39(2):365–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Filippo M, Saba L, Rossi E, et al. Curved needles in CT-guided fine needle biopsies of abdominal and retroperitoneal small lesions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(6):1611–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Rose SC. Society of interventional radiology standards of practice committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(7):969–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shao H, McCarthy C, Wehrenberg-Klee E, et al. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of retroperitoneal and pelvic lymphadenopathy: assessment of technique, diagnostic yield, and clinical value. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(10):1429–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tomozawa Y, Inaba Y, Yamaura H, et al. Clinical value of CT-guided needle biopsy for retroperitoneal lesions. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12(3):351–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Vadvala HV, Furtado VF, Kambadakone A, Frenk NE, Mueller PR, Arellano RS. Image-guided percutaneous omental and mesenteric biopsy: assessment of technical success rate and diagnostic yield. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(11):1569–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Hugh McGonigle, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuya Koike.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent

This study has obtained IRB approval and the need for informed consent was waived.

Consent for Publication

Consent for publication was obtained for every individual person’s data included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koike, Y., Matsui, S., Takase, K. et al. CT-Guided Percutaneous Needle Biopsy in Patients with Suspected Retroperitoneal Fibrosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 42, 1434–1440 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-019-02266-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-019-02266-x

Keywords

Navigation