Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy for Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Five-Year Trends and Predictors of Conversion

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is rare but often fatal. Surgery offers the only chance of cure. As minimally invasive (MI) procedures for cancer become common, their role for ACC is still debated. We reviewed usage of MI approaches for ACC over time and risk factors for conversion using a large national database.

Methods

ACC patients with localized disease were identified in the National Cancer Data Base from 2010 to 2014. A retrospective review examined trends in the surgical approach over time. Patient demographics, surgical approach, and tumor characteristics between MI, open, and converted procedures were compared.

Results

588 patients underwent adrenalectomy for ACC, of which 200 were minimally invasive. From 2010 to 2014, MI operations increased from 26 to 44% with robotic procedures increasing from 5 to 16%. The use of MI operations compared to open was not different based on facility type (p = 0.40) or location (p = 0.63). MI tumors were more likely to be confined to the adrenal (p < 0.001) but final margin status was not different (p = 0.56). Conversion was performed in 38/200 (19%). Average tumor size was 10.2 cm in the converted group compared to 8.6 cm in the MI group (p = 0.09). There was no difference in extent of disease (p = 0.33), margin status (p = 0.12), or lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.59) between MI and converted procedures. Tumor size > 5 cm was the only significant predictor of conversion (p = 0.04). No patients with pathologic stage I disease required conversion (0/19).

Conclusions

The frequency of MI approaches for ACC is increasing. In the final year of the study, 44% of adrenalectomies were MI. Size > 5 cm was the only significant predictor of conversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bilimoria K, Shen W, Elaraj D et al (2008) Adrenocortical carcinoma in the United States: treatment utilization and prognostic factors. Cancer 113:3130–3136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Neuroendocrine Tumors (Version 2.2017) http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/neuroendocrine.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2017

  3. Leboulleux S, Deandreis D, Al Ghuzlan A et al (2010) Adrenocortical carcinoma: is the surgical approach a risk factor of peritoneal carcinomatosis? Eur J Endocrinol 162:1147–1153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez R, Shapiro S, Sarlis N et al (2005) Laparoscopic resection of adrenal cortical carcinoma: a cautionary note. Surgery 138:1078–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller B, Ammori J, Broome J et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection is inappropriate for known or suspected adrenocortical carcinoma. World J Surg 34:1380–1385. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0532-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee C, Salem A, Schneider D et al (2017) Minimally invasive resection of adrenocortical carcinoma: a multi-institutional study of 201 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 21:352–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdel-Aziz T, Rajeev P, Sadler G et al (2015) Risk of adrenocortical carcinoma in adrenal tumors > 8cm. World J Surg 39:1268–1273. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2912-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sturgeon C, Shen W, Clark O et al (2006) Risk assessment in 457 adrenal cortical carcinomas: how much does tumor size predict the likelihood of malignancy? J Am Coll Surg 202:423–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dovirak O, Mao J, Taylor K et al (2016) How to quantify recovery after laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an assessment of patient-reported health-related quality of life. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:290–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xin L, Sey K (2016) Robotic assisted adrenalectomy: is it ready for prime time? Investig Clinc Urol 57:S130–S146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carnaille B (2012) Adrenocortical carcinoma: which surgical approach? Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:195–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park J, Kim S, Lee C et al (2013) Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2741–2745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crucitti F, Bellantone R, Ferrante A et al (1996) The italian registry for adrenal cortical carcinoma: analysis of a multi-institutional series of 129 patients. Surgery 119:161–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sautter A, Cunningham S, Kowdley G et al (2016) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal cancer-a systematic review. Am Surg 82:420–426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaujoux S, Bonnet S, Leconte M et al (2011) Risk factors for conversion and complications after unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 10:1292–1299

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim Y, Margonis G, Prescott J et al (2017) Curative surgical resection of adrenocortical carcinoma: determining long-term outcome based on conditional disease-free probability. Ann of Surg 265:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie A. Calcatera.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calcatera, N.A., Hsiung-Wang, C., Suss, N.R. et al. Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy for Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Five-Year Trends and Predictors of Conversion. World J Surg 42, 473–481 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4290-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4290-2

Navigation